Preview

Analysis Of Plato's Theory Of Bedtime Stories

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1839 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Plato's Theory Of Bedtime Stories
Every night growing up I would brush my teeth, muffle my pajamas on, pick out my favorite bedtime story, and mosey my way into bed before dozing off to my Mom or Dad’s voice. Gently but precisely handpicking my bedtime story, it was seldom the Bernstein Bears or Dr. Seuss, rather a fairy tale: the ones with the happy endings. Looking back on the bedtime stories I developed an indescribable aw and admiration for, I realize how often the main character fell in love and “lived happily ever after” The idea of finding my own fairy tale became a mere dream for the future, that I would make my mission to one day come true. Plato develops his own theory on finding a happily ever after through his theory of forms, specifically the form of love. This …show more content…
“The nuclear family is a partnership between a male and female who are both sexually and socially benefitted by the association. The essential and fundamental pillar that differentiates the heterosexual relationship from the nuclear family is love. The empowering emotion of love leads the couple to attain the benefits of reproduction, enjoyment, and protection.” The nuclear family, a recently developed relationship, was greatly overshadowed by the lover boyfriend, homosexual, relationship for some time. While the men in The Symposium promoted the lover boyfriend relationship, they did remain involved in heterosexual relationships. However, these heterosexual relationships did not embody the characteristics of the nuclear family De Waal discusses. The key difference between the heterosexual relationship and the nuclear family is females’ inferiority and trivial role to males. “The men did not view the relationship as intellectually beneficial or challenging enough for the male to associate this relationship with love. The relationship was purely sexually driven.” The heterosexual relationship has revolutionized into the nuclear family. The most common and idealized relationship by the majority of human beings, the nuclear family is advantageous and salient to modern …show more content…
Until you whole-heartedly love yourself, you are incapable of authentically and adequately loving someone else. Loving yourself is distinguishing and grasping every imperfection and insecurity as a significant contribution to your overall self, whom is perfect. Accepting that no one, including you, is shy of faults and blemishes crafts an almost flawless love that discovers our true, inherent worth. To appreciate and adore the power of human love is a true gift that is achieved through identifying self-worth and purpose. While this love has the most reward, it also seems the most difficult for humans to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Functionalists employ the idea of the nuclear family being the main universal family in society and most benefitting. The nuclear family functions to meet the pro dominant means of society (sexual reproduction, educational and economic functions). The family allows each member of the family to shine individually and enjoy success. Functionalist Charles Murray also argues other family institutions weaken the production of society’s needs. Divorce is ultimately highlighted as one of the main causes of this creation of new reconstituted families which are presumably less effective in meeting the functional needs of society through the family.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many sociologists (e.g. Goran Therborn) argue that the typical nuclear family has disintegrated due to many different reasons, for example, the rise in feminism and women gaining more independence; higher diversity of relationships for example higher divorce rates, higher number of families co-habiting. his is because families aren’t like what they used to be. In the nuclear families today, the roles of the mother and father are no longer segregated conjugal roles. In the nuclear family today roles are changing and developing into integrated conjugal roles. Partners are becoming more egalitarian which is leading to the nuclear symmetrical family. Due to the symmetrical family developing socialists believe the idea of the ‘new man’. A man that shares housework and the responsibility of the children.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Today sociologists in Britain would not agree that nuclear families are the norm. This is because families aren’t like what they used to be. In the nuclear families today, the roles of the mother and father are no longer segregated conjugal roles. In the nuclear family today roles are changing and developing into integrated conjugal roles. Partners are becoming more egalitarian which is leading to the nuclear symmetrical family. Due to the symmetrical family developing socialists believe the idea of the ‘new man’. A man that shares housework and the responsibility of the children.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nuclear family is usually imagined as a two-parent household with two-point one children, a dog, and a white picket fence surrounding the perfect home; but how perfect is a nuclear family? In recent history, different situations have arisen and the concept of a nuclear family have diminished from the thoughts of modern families as more opportunities have opened up to allow a variety of alternative lifestyles. With the variety of family situations arising in today's society, I feel the typical nuclear family should no longer be the ideal family concept. My reasons for this is because of the amount of diverse family living situations that have risen over the past few decades, nuclear families don't have to be labelled as "perfect". Families may now consist of only one parent or two mothers and two fathers, or the care of grandparents. The thought of being in a nuclear family…

    • 707 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A traditional view of the family is held by Functionalists. Functionalists favour the nuclear family which Murdock identifies as ‘a social group characterised by common residents, economic cooperation and reproduction. It includes adults of both sexes, at least two of whom maintain a socially approved sexual relationship and one or more children (own or adopted) of the sexually cohabiting parents.’ Leach describes the nuclear family as the cereal packet family because it is seen as the ideal family of a Functionalist society. Parsons identifies the nuclear family as having a strict division of roles between the two parents. Their roles are segregated where the man has the instrumental role of being the breadwinner. Then his wife has the expressive role with domestic and childcare responsibilities. Similarly the New Right favour the nuclear family and pinpoint this family as the best family for raising children. However the nuclear family is not the most common family type in the UK today. This can be seen in the statistics that show 20% of households in the UK are made up of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation 1.5 nuclear family. Furthermore only 5% of the UK lives in a traditional nuclear model.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modernist approaches to the family such as functionalism and the New Right emphasise the dominance of the nuclear family type in modern society.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato’s Symposium is a book of speeches given in honor of Eros, the god of love. Aristophanes, a comic poet, gives the first speech, and the second is given by Socrates. The first speech tells a humorous history of mankind and how it became “whole,” addressing gender issues and sexuality. On a more serious note, the second speech addresses the origin of Eros and his use to humans.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although, America believes that we are a nation of equality and acceptance, we are in reality the exact opposite. Not only do major gender inequalities still exist, but society continues to be just as prejudice and discriminatory. With the establishment of the nuclear family, consisting of a heterosexual couple and children, the mentality that heterosexuality is the ideal standard has stayed the same. There have been many criticisms on compulsory heterosexuality and the idea that heterosexuality is the only real natural relationship. In the article, “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence” by Adrienne Rich, she states that, “heterosexuality, like motherhood, needs to be recognized and studied as a political institution” (Rich 637). She argues that heterosexuality is politically institutionalized because it has been strategically and deliberately carried out by laws and regulations that restrains women and represses…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The nuclear family ensures that generation after generation remain embroiled in capitalism. The nuclear family is an ideal way to condition the family into capitalism, which reproduces the ideologies of capitalism…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many sociologists argue that the nuclear family is a universal and dominate institution however there has been an increase in diverse family types for various reasons. Examples of these diverse families are lone parents, reconstitutions and cohabitation families. Although most people experience life in a nuclear family, it represents only a stage in their life cycle. Social and demographic changes have meant that an increasing part of many people’s lives are spent in households that are not based on conventional nuclear families.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    We never know ourselves to be truly loved until we know ourselves to be loved by…

    • 2281 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    mad con

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This essay is asking me to weigh up that the ‘Nuclear Family’ is beneficial to it’s family ‘members’ and ‘society’ or if the ‘Nuclear Family’ is not beneficial to it’s members and society. This will involve me to examine the Functionalist, Marxist, Feminist and Radical-Feminist perspectives.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many years ago, Parsons studied families from different type and decided that through structural differentiation, the multifunctional extended family became the nuclear family, and made a point of focusing on this type of family. Marxism also made this mistake, as well as feminism. What these approaches didn’t take into account was that there are many other types of family out there, which is even truer in contempary society. This essay will attempt to asses the extent of this diversity, and the explanations of it.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assess the view that, despite recent changes in family life, “the conventional nuclear family remains the norm” for families and households in Britain today. (24 marks)…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato's Timaeus

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Kraut, Richard (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. (ISBN: 0-521-43610 9; B395.C28 1992).…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays