Preview

Analysis Of Prokopios The Secret History

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
176 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Prokopios The Secret History
Prokopios was a historian who wrote about Justinian and how great of an emperor he was to the new Roman Empire. “The Secret History” was his own version of history that he wrote secretly. Unlike his public works, he wrote about how Justinian and Theodora, the empress, were more detrimental to the Roman Empire rather than beneficial. In his public works, Prokopios went about praising the Roman government, the Emperor and Empress, and the people of the community. In his private works, he criticized the marriage of Justinian and Theodora, them as rulers, and the Roman Empire as an entire nation. The claims made in Prokopios’ private works came off as way too fabricated and biased to be true. One out of the many overambitious claims he made was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this essay I will argue that the Principate is a history of military dictatorships insofar as certain emperors seize power via some form of military coup. I shall cover emperors via the themes of: bread and circuses, reliance on the army and Praetorian Guard as depicted on imperial coinage and the times when the accession of an emperor is instigated by either defeat in battle or the assassination of one’s predecessor.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DBQ Barbarian Invasions

    • 1909 Words
    • 5 Pages

    7. When the Emperor heard that “Roma” had “perished” (died), what did he think? When he learned what really happened, how did he respond? What does this say about the Emperor?…

    • 1909 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this project I am investigating how Empress Theodora become so powerful, what ways did she use? The author of The Secret History, the only source of information about Theodora, was named Procopius. He was a great historian of the Byzantine Empire, who was born in Caesarea on the coast of Palestine in 500 A.D., and died around 565 A.D. After his death, only two other books written by Procopius were found: History of the Wars and Buildings. The Secret History was originally written in Latin, published by Niccolo Alamanni in 1632, and translated into English by G.A. Williamson in 1996. Procopius has very negative things to say about Empress Theodora. He felt disdain towards her and her husband, Justinian. Even though he worked with them, he…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justinian’s accomplishments were like those of Trajan and his personality was like Neros’. Trajan was a clever man who created programs for public work and child welfare. Trajan also built multiple new bridges, harbors, and aqueducts. However, Nero was the opposite he was a selfish liar who did not care how his decisions affected his people and “Justinian was…crafty, hypocritical, secretive by temperament, two-faced: a clever fellow who created countless cities which did not exist before with marvelous ability to conceal his real opinion… lying all the time…”(Documents 1&2). Justinian was an emperor with flaws like Nero he was a selfish liar who spent countless amounts of money building the Hagia Sophia without considering the consequences, but at the same time like Trajan he was clever, crafty and was able to build multiple new cities that benefited the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    -His style was an “extension of political life and was aimed at those who held political power in rome” He is often criticized for his dull version of history. his style is clumsy and often very dense…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The emperor Gaius is a very misunderstood man, who is often brandished with the label of being ‘Mad’ both by ancient and modern scholars. However, it is my belief, it was the absolute power given to him, at such a young age, which caused him to have a mental breakdown. As emperor, he had no one but himself to stop him doing whatever his heart desires, which explains his increasingly cruel and erratic behaviour between AD 37 when Caligula fell ill and AD 41 when the Praetorian Guard took matters into their own hands and assassinated the 29-year-old emperor. The immense power that Gaius was given is bet described by Ferrill, “The powers it had taken Augustus a lifetime to accumulate, Caligula received in a single moment” .…

    • 2510 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout the years there have been a multitude of monsters created by people to elicit fear and obedience and also to explain why things occur. Greeks and their predecessors were quite talented at creating stories containing gods and monsters to explain the phenomena of nature around them. Sometimes the lines between the gods and monsters blur in the myths. Although he would be considered a titan or a god due to his birth, Kronos (Cronus) can also be considered a monster as a result of his characteristics and actions.…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Study Guide Final

    • 1127 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Reigned from 527-565. Military conquests, rebuilds city, law code. From Macedonia. Adopted. Had a lot of smart people working in his administration. Retook Rome as a way to get a larger tax base. Wanted to restore religious unity, afraid Jesus was returning and wanted Rome back to the great city it was.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caligula’s brief reign as princeps stripped away the illusion of the Augustan restoration of the republic and exposed the truth of the principate being nothing less than autocratic rule. His reign saw some significant historical changes in the imperial system. He ensured that upon his immediate accession his reign would not model that of his predecessor, a step that secured his popularity. His dutiful display of recovering his mother and brother’s ashes not only served out the purpose of securing the populace’s favour, but also his right to rule. However, Caligula’s behaviour spiralled out of control months later, contributing to the deterioration of his relationship with the senate and the Praetorian Guard, his embarkation of expansionism and change in provincial administration and causing some financial strain resulting from his lavish expenditure.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This incident has been recorded in many historical documents such as the works, biographer Plutarch and, historian Thucydides. From analysis of these their accounts is can be deduced that Plutarch’s account is unreliable and presents a biased point of view.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Procopius is considered to be a historian, who lived in the 6th century. From his works we are able to visit back into the Byzantine Empire, when Emperor Justinian reigned. Through the three books he created: “History of the Wars”, “The Buildings of Justinian”, and “The Secret History”, he is our primary source of information about the reign of Emperor Justinian. After reading “The Secret History”, I found the tone of the book to be different than that of a classical historian’s book. Procopius tells us that he wants the true events of this time to be recorded, for all to know the misdeeds of the tyrants, so that “those who in the future, if it so happens,…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Augustus Caesar was a highly respected ruler of the Roman Empire. Augustus rose to his power after his uncle, Julius Caesar, was killed. He was forced to clean up the mess Julius had left after his assassination. The Roman Republic was shattered after all the fighting that took place to decipher the future leader of Rome. The problems that occurred were not from outside threats, it was inside the city where the disruption began and tore the city apart. Augustus Caesar believed that only a strong monarchy could bring the city back up on its feet. He ruled with republican views because he knew the ruling class would support him, and that was what he needed. Later on once he became a legitimate ruler of Rome he took the name princeps, which meant first citizen, rather than dictator or king. This made him seem as if he was not as powerful and overbearing as past rulers of the Roman Empire. Augustus Caesar had a very positive historical legacy. He did many things for the public to keep them safe and also helped the impoverished people while rewarding those who were successful. Caesar improved every aspect of Rome from the law, to the people, to taxes. He was an all-around gratuitous ruler. Augustus Caesar was a strong ruler from the beginning of his reign to the end, his techniques for ruling were highly successful, and he left behind a very positive legacy.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Caesar's Conquest of Gaul

    • 2527 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Gaius Julius Caesar, born 100 B.C.E. in Rome to the impoverished patrician Julian Clan, knew controversy at an early age. Nephew to Popular Gaius Marius, he was earmarked by the Optimate dictator Sulla for prosciption after his refusal to divorce his Popular wife, Cinna. Fleeing Rome, and not returning until after Sulla 's resignation in 78 B.C.E, upon his return he gained a position as a pontificate, an important Roman priesthood. Slowly but surely throughout his lifetime he worked his way up the political ladder, eventually becoming Consul, and finally Dictator Perpeteus – Dictator for life. One of the most influential political and military leaders of all time, Caesar was also a highly intelligent man and an exceptional orator. However, acquiring this absolute power was no mean feat, and Caesar had well equipped himself through previous expeditions with all the resources necessary to gain power in Ancient Rome.…

    • 2527 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many ancient and modern interpretations about Sennacherib’s effectiveness as a ruler. Sennacherib was a king from 704 BCE up to 681BCE. He accomplished numerous things for Assyria such as, the expansion of the empire, build water supplies to the city and the gain of support from the gods to the Assyrian people. The ancient and modern interpretations provide many information’s about Sennacherib’s building projects, military and religious role. Sennacherib was a very effective ruler and this will be assessed throughout this essay.…

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A key difference between the two texts is the acceptance of their instability. The Bell Jar is clearly about Ester’s mental breakdown and she never seems in denial of this; whereas Richard in The Secret History ignores and hides his instability and it is only through the inconsistencies in his portrayal of the events that reader is able to infer it. This inconsistency is shown through heavy use of the passive voice and the halting, slow admittance of his involvement with the murder combined with the sudden, surprising reveal of Henry’s suicide – which isn’t full picked up again in the rest of the novel. It is only through this that the reader notices his instability , denial of events – whilst under the facade of a memoire and his obsession with the other characters in the novel which then leads to a mild distrust of Richard’s portrayal of events and the acceptance on…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays