Preview

Analysis of the Bet

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
809 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis of the Bet
Choices in Life
“The death sentence and the life sentence are equally immoral, but if I had to choose between the death penalty and imprisonment for life I would certainly choose the second. To live anyhow is better than not at all” (Chekhov 1). In Anton Chekhov’s short story “The Bet” a lawyer and a banker make a bet about which penalty is more humane. The lawyer says that life imprisonment is more humane. In saying this, the lawyer bets he can stayed locked up in a cell for 15 years without any human contact and it will show it’s more humane. In the short story “The Bet” by Anton Chekhov; the lawyer encounters many types of conflicts including man vs. man, man vs. self, and man vs. nature.
The lawyer encounters man vs. man conflict in the short story when he makes the bet with the banker trying to state his opinion. The banker carrying on the conversation trying to prove he is correct and not letting anyone challenge him. The banker states “It’s not true I bet you two million you wouldn’t stay in solitary confinement for five years” (Chekhov 1). The lawyer replying says “If you mean that earnest... I’ll take your bet but not for five but fifteen years” (Chekhov 1). The lawyer not thinking takes the bet giving away his freedom for fifteen years. Many people would take the bet thinking only about the money and no their life or freedom. The lawyer at the time is a very greedy man only thinking about money. The banker trying to convince the lawyer he is wrong says “think better of it young man while there is still time. To me two million is a trifle but you are losing three or four of the best years of your life... (Chekhov 2). The lawyer still not caring about losing fifteen years of his life only caring about money still takes the bet. The banker later on questions why they made the bet and the good of throwing away two million dollars. The lawyer still doesn’t care he would go against any man to get money in his pocket.
Another conflict the lawyer encounters
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Raskolnikov’s Rift: Alienating and Enriching
    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Raskolnikov’s Rift: Alienating and Enriching

    Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment centers on Raskolnikov, a man who chooses to murder a common pawnbroker while he struggles with guilt, alienation, and pride. The choice to commit murder creates a division between Raskolnikov and society because he violates the moral laws governing society. In Crime and Punishment, the rift between Raskolnikov and society is both alienating and enriching for his character and demonstrates Dostoevsky’s opinion of an individual’s place in society.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Placing a $2 Bet Poetry Analysis
    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Placing a $2 Bet Poetry Analysis

    “Placing a $2 Bet for a Man Who Will Never Go to the Horse Races Any More” by Diane Wakoski is an expression of animosity she feels toward her father after meeting him for the first time in 14 years. It is an exploration of her philosophy of life and how her unhappy childhood has impacted her. Wakoski writes about her painful relationship with her father and explores the distant and miniscule relationship between father and daughter. “Placing a $2 Bet” is a poem of Wakoski’s philosophy towards life and the men, specifically her father, who inhabit it.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Right To Die Laws By Meghan Daum Analysis
    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page

    Right To Die Laws By Meghan Daum Analysis

    A choice is equivalent to a possibility that could prosper or extinguish. Choices really do make a difference. Writer, author, columnist, Meghan Daum knows the conception of “making big life decisions” in order to contemplate the innate right to discriminate right from wrong. In “Right-to-die laws: Do we have the gumption to make such big life decisions”, Daum already presents who she will be, and test her audience audacity to make a crucial life choice. Who would we be if our lives were out of our grasp ? The question does not pose to discern who each reader is. Moreover, the main point is to prove an inevitable truth that pervades through society. Daum begins her column with a heart-wrenching story of Brittany Maynard, 29, who commits euthanasia…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Pascal s Wager
    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pascal s Wager

    Pascal’s Wager is that of whether or not to believe in God. What are the benefits? What are the consequences? I will argue that Pascal’s Wager is indeed persuasive to believing in God due to the appeal of one’s emotions and desires. One may object that Pascal is not thoroughly persuasive regarding that the belief in God’s existence is greater than not believing, but I will continue to argue that it is, and it can only offer the better reward.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phi208 Ethics And Moral Reasoning Research Paper
    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Phi208 Ethics And Moral Reasoning Research Paper

    Even though living in pain can be a physical and emotional toll on a person’s life, no one can judge or comment on it without knowing how it feels, but choosing to end your life for this cause is ethically wrong. A person should not be able to choose between life and death like it is something normal that we do every day. Dying is not the answer to a person’s problems, pains, or sufferings. Now a day technology and medicine are highly advanced and can cure or reduce the pain of a person with a disease. Choosing to end your life is basically committing suicide and suicide is wrong.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Koch
    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Koch

    In his essay, the author includes seven main arguments opposing capital punishment and refutes them. People may find that the death penalty is a barbaric act and Koch argues this point by suggesting that the method of lethal injection is actually quite humane and literally painless. He also argues that although no other democratic country imposes the death penalty as a form of punishment, no other country boasts a murder rate as high as the United States. The author contends with those who believe capital punishment diminishes life’s value by suggesting the contrary. He has found those who are sentenced to death have been judged fairly and with a great deal of examination. Koch then refutes the argument of capital punishment as a state-sanctioned murder by acknowledging that the state holds much different rights and responsibilities than the individual.…

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Phil 1112 Death Penalty
    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Phil 1112 Death Penalty

    Pojman, Louis. "A Defense of the Death Penalty." Issues in Applied Ethics: n. pag. Contemporary Issues in Applied Ethics ebook. Web. 11 Apr. 2011.…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Crime and Punishment: Analysis
    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Crime and Punishment: Analysis

    “Nobody, but he who has felt it, can conceive what a plaguing thing it is to have a man’s mind torn asunder by two projects of equal strength, both obstinately pulling in contrary direction at the time.” (Laurence Sterne) In Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment, it is this exact miscalculation that leads the protagonist Raskolnikov (Rodya) to his ultimate mental, physical and social demise. Similarly, the theme of the novel directly correlates to Sterne’s quote, as Dostoyevsky delves into the psychology of a criminal, centering the novel on a murder and its after-affects on the transgressor.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Of Sentencing
    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophy Of Sentencing

    This paper is written in an attempt to comprehend the sentencing philosophy and purpose of criminal punishment through a review of the historical parameters concerning how sentencing and punishment serve society. Sentencing is the application of justice and the end result of a criminal conviction which is applied by the convening authority; followed by the sentence, or judgement of the court on a convicted offender. What makes punishment unique to our society is the application of our moral or ethical beliefs as a whole, and by the population at large. Throughout history, the sentencing and administration of punishments have been swift, brutal and often times ending with the death of the offender, but in our more civilized and modern society,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cost of the Death Penalty
    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cost of the Death Penalty

    Costs and Consequences of the Death Penalty, written by Mark Costanzo, neatly lists reasons for opposition, and abolishment of, the death penalty. Costanzo provides a review of the history of the death penalty, a review of how the death penalty process is working today, questions on whether or not if the death penalty is inhumane and cheaper than life imprisonment. He also questions if the death penalty is fairly applied and the impact, if any, that it has on deterrence. He closely examines the public's support of the death penalty and questions the morality of the death penalty. Finally, Costanzo provides his own resolution and alternative to the death penalty. Each of these items allows the reader an easy, and once again, neat view of how the death penalty can work against out society rather than for it.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Informative Speech on Prisoner's Dilemma
    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Informative Speech on Prisoner's Dilemma

    First of all, let us recall a proverb. ‘One boy is one boy. Two boys are half a boy. Three boys are no boy at all.’ It also translates as ‘one monk goes to drink water; two monks drinks together while three monks have no water to drink’. Now suppose you are one of the three monks, will you go far away to take water? If you do, the other two may have water to drink without effort; if you don’t and nor do the other two, you all will die of thirst.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    A moral understanding of Utilitarianism and torture
    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A moral understanding of Utilitarianism and torture

    KSM is a mastermind terrorist who has been captured by the CIA. He refuses to reveal any information about his organization or the members thereof that could be fundamental to the welfare of hundreds of lives. Even under the presence of coercive methods such as sleep deprivation and water boarding, he has refused to talk. His nine and eleven year old children have been brought into custody and a suggestion has been made to torture the children. Is the option ethical or moral in any sense? Utilitarianism provides two answers for the question; one asserting the general rule of utility, the other expanding on justice implicating that the notion that no harm should be inflicted on the children. Each case will be dissected and assessed to reveal the most feasible answer to whether or not the children should be tortured. This conclusion will also be questioned on whether or not the provided answer is approaching the situation in the best possible manner.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Abortion Is Immoral
    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Abortion Is Immoral

    As Marquis suggests, the act of killing another innocent human being is morally wrong because deprives that person of a valuable future. He examines why exactly it is wrong to kill us. It is not the brutalization of the one who kills or the great loss others would experience due to our absence. Although it seems adequate, it does not account for killing a person who has no family or anyone that cares for them. What primarily makes killing wrong is its effect on the victim—the greatest loss one can suffer is the loss of one’s own life. This action takes away all of the future experiences, activities, enjoyments and many more things even if they are not valued to that individual now, but they will come to value them later in life. Once killed, one is automatically deprived of all of the value of his or her future. This view that what makes killing wrong is the loss of the victim’s future is supported by two considerations. First, it explains why we regard killing as one of the worst crimes, since it is the most depriving of any other crime. Second, those who are suffering from diseases like AIDS or cancer who know that they are getting closer and closer to death believe that dying is the worst thing that can happen to them, because, once again, it deprives them of a future that they would have otherwise…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Abolishing the Death Penalty in America
    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Abolishing the Death Penalty in America

    As well as seeing deterrence as a justifiable reason for the death penalty, individuals believe it is an act of fairness and retribution. They see it as a way of “maintaining the distribution of civic burdens”, and a method of payback, which is the “eye for an…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty Cases
    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Death Penalty Cases

    The controversy surrounding the death penalty is an issue that has no end in sight. For the worst-of-the-worst, the people who have committed the most heinous crimes, some feel as though there is no better suited punishment than the most severe, death. However, the opposing side often brings up arguments the logic in punishing a murderer with murder, and how much justice could actually be achieved, or whether the initial wrong has faced at all justice through capital punishment. When talking about the death penalty, the infamous hardened criminals like Ted Bundy, or John Wayne Gacy come to mind for most people. Many people find the crimes punishable by death to be so atrocious that capital punishment is the only logical option, but what happens…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics