Preview

Analysis Of The Film Inequality For All

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1116 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of The Film Inequality For All
In the film Inequality for All, Robert Reich breaks down the staggering facts on the unfortunate unequal distribution of wealth between the different society classes that American is built on which has unfortunately caused some shattering effects on the American system when it comes to the economy. His main concern is the fact that the middle class, which makes up to approximately more than 70% of the economy, is being kept on a standard from the wealthy class that only lands a 1% of our economy and society, making the amount of income as half of the country. He begins his focus explaining how in the early1970s inequality became a prominent issue, not necessarily in a declining economy, but more on a wider issue. In contrast, he clarifies that …show more content…
This point itself is what sets the inequality we have in our society. When the wealthy pays half of what the middle-class worker pays in taxes, they are given enough room to save and accumulate money to begin more business and invest in more money, and again have a lot of money and not paying the taxes required for that money in the reason we don’t have a balance where the wealthy keep going up and the middle keep battling their way to earning a living for a day. It is unfortunate, but reality is that the inequality we have in our society is a large monster that is growing on its own and out of proportion, it takes away many of the middle-class members jobs and leaves homes with the inconvenient instability of living. The more the executive pay grows to climb up the more money it will earn causing the unbalance in our economy. Inequality is a matter that came about those decisions driven by the upper class on to the government that makes the choices for its people. There should be a working progress on solving this issue, and the citizens, in general, are responsible for putting the words out there and speaking out their concerns to make a difference in the workforce. If there is no difference made, it will only be harder for the generations to come, and if we think the inequality we have in our present day awful, then I can only imagine what is to come worst. This Documentary is meant to open the mind of the viewers to realize that factors contributed to the inequality we have in our economy and between our classes. Many of the American citizens are searching for the “American dream,” and it is only their job to work for it and assure themselves of getting

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article "Confronting Inequality" Paul Krugman is explaining the inequality in the United States, while demonstrating the many statistics. He is mentions American huge gap between the elites and lower and income classes. Economic inequality brings the social inequality, where as a result, we would have a society of unequal opportunities. In 1997 Irving Kristol published an article in The Wall Street Journal called ‘Income Inequality Without Class Conflict.’ Kristol argued that we shouldn't worry about income inequality, because whatever the numbers may say, class distinctions are, in reality, all but gone.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paul Krugman’s book the Conscience of a Liberal is meant to shape conversation about income inequality and promote liberal ideas the way the Conscience of a Conservative promoted movement conservatism and policies that created income inequality. In the book Krugman explains how the policies of the New Deal created a long period of economic growth, the policies that led to income inequality rising again, and the levels of income inequality that exists now. He explains the rise of movement conservatism, and how movement conservative politicians exploited racial and social divisions and anxiety to advance their otherwise unpopular economic agenda. He explains abundance of political unity during the times with little inequality and the partisanship…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Frank Too Big Too Ignore

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Robert Frank, a professer at Cornell University, published an article for the New York Times on October 16, 2010. The title of the article was "Income Inequality: Too Big to Ignore". In "Income Inequality: Too Big to Ignore", Frank argues that there are differences in the social classes of the American people and that it is having a negative effect on our economy's growth. Frank explains that middle class citizens are in a struggle to maintain a good financial position. Meanwhile, the upper class citizens are spending copious amounts of money which makes it increasingly more difficult for the middle class to meet their basic needs. He says that the middle class are looking toward upper class citizens, comparing their posesions as well as their financial positions which makes the middle class feel financially unstable.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, Mrs. Jill Lepore addresses that "Income inequality is greater in the United States than in any other democracy in the developed world"(Lepore 1)…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The richest Americans hold nearly 90 percent of the total household wealth in the country” (Mantsios 380). That leaves a mere ten percent to be distributed among the rest of the population, this is a wide margin considering less than half the population holds the nation’s wealth. A wealth more evenly split would see a greater impact on those who would benefit most, those suffering who need more financial security. The middle class, a population keen on imitating the rich, would require the average worker making a salary of “$49,455 (the median income in the United States)” over “2,500 lifetimes to earn $10 billion”, which more than 70 of the 1,000 billionaires living in the United States are worth (Mantsios 380). The wealth of the nation is so unevenly distributed that many Americans are suffering, yet no improvements have been made.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Inequality For All, former U.S. Secretary of Labor, Robert Reich, discusses the allocation of money that flows into America and how significant it is to make people conscious about what is happening. The documentary starts out with Reich states that inequality is unavoidable towards select groups yet people still work hard, innovate, and strive solely on incentives that helps keep them motivated. He then describes that it’s essentially what capitalism is and in this class, it’s how markets can prevail and not fail as it is one of the major principles of economics. There were other examples of the principles of economics of economics that were shown in the documentary. For example, Erika who works at Costco not only thinks at the margin but struggles with trade-offs, only considering what is most beneficial for her and her family with what little income they have after bills.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Technique

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    No one can argue that America is the country of the human rights and freedom and many people around the world dream to live in this great place. However, big problem is going to reshape the American society if nobody tried to solve it. The dilemma is simply that the rich got richer and the poor got poorer as a result of inequality of money distribution among rich and poor people.America had created a marvelous economic machine, but evidently it worked only for that at the top. Both Joseph E. Stieglitz and Timothy Noahintroduce a very critical issue which affects the American society in these days, is the widening gap between the rich and poor people. Stieglitz claims that the American economic system is failing for most of Americans and the inequality is increasing to the extent that one day will be unaffordable. The rising gap is created by the one top percent who are taking advantage of making a huge wealth. They are driven by their greed to accumulate big fortune upon poor’s shoulders. Stieglitz came up with some evidence to support his claim. One of these is the new statistics fromCensus Bureau’s statistics that shows that the one top percent gain 20 % of the total American income. Therefore, Noah says that this inequality income creates and retains the capitalism system which forms a serious threat upon middle and lower class (Noah The Great par 3).…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “Income Inequality: Too Big to Ignore”, Frank shows the influences in Americans’ lives in different classes by the disparity between the rich and the poor. He arouses people’s consciousness for the “rising inequality” which is being polarized and has been causing immense damages to Americans, no matter which class they are. It is true that the “Income Inequality” in America is very obvious and affecting more and more people. Indeed, “we should just agree that it’s a bad thing”, however, are we able to do something concrete to deal with it effectively? Is the” rising inequality really required in the name of fairness”? I stand neutral towards Frank’s opinion.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past generation inequality has become a big issue in our society. Whether you are rich or poor, born here or immigrant, high class or middle class, inequality will find its own way to you some how. Here we should stop and ask ourselves why should we care about high and rising inequality? The answer to this question is in these three articles, “Bring on More Immigrant Entrepreneurs “by Shayan Zadeh, “Confronting Inequality” by Paul Krugman, and RIP, Middle Class: 1946-2013” by Edward McClelland. These three articles have discussed the inequality issue from three different point of views in three different and unique ways.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Film Inequality For All

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "Inequality for All" is very informative and persuasive documentary movie, produced by Robert Kornbluth and featuring Robert Reich, a professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley who was also a political appointee who served as the Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. The movie explains how extreme inequality in income and wealth is a major problem for our society, regardless of which political side you find yourself on. Using video outtakes from the lecture series he currently presents at Berkeley and linking those with clips from movies and other videos, this documentary shows how income inequality has changed over decades in the United States. The movie offers a clear-eyed expose of a system that truly is stacked in favor of those who already have most of the money in America.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay “Inequality Has Been Going on Forever... but That Doesn’t Mean It’s Inevitable”, David Leonhardt argues that despite the persistent trend of income inequality in the U.S. and throughout history, it is not impossible to change that inequality. He writes that the professor, Thomas Piketty points out the process in which inequality rises and the near inevitability of it. Leonhardt tells of his conversations with Piketty and Piketty’s idea on the possible way to solve inequality, which is to put a global wealth tax that is specifically for income inequality. Leonhardt finds this solution politically improbable and instead advises that the government changes the taxation of the wealthy, healthcare, how we manage the Department of Transportation,…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul Krugman

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Paul Krugman’s Confronting Inequality, we are told, as citizens of the United States, the damages of high and rising inequality within our country. Krugman describes America as a place of unclear economic progress for the middle class while the share of economic growth in the past 3 decades has gone to the wealthy 1%. Krugman next describes the impact such inequality has on our society and republic. First starting with social inequality, he states “The fact is the vast income inequality inevitably brings vast social inequality inevitably brings vast social inequality in its train” (589). What Krugman is trying to convey is that as the gap between classes grows, it brings with it greater and greater inequality.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Great Divergence In America

    • 2351 Words
    • 10 Pages

    During the past thirty-three years the gap between the rich, middle-class, and impoverished has become much more prominent. At the early signs of this great economic divergence, people mistook it for a short slip-up in our nations economy, but now the divergence has become a reality of life itself. There were signs that the indifference was beginning to disappear in 2011 when The Occupy Wall Street movement occurred, but its hard to know if these will have any lasting effect in our nations future. We tend to think of America growing more equal in society not less, and it has in ways such as gender equality, equality amongst races, marriage…

    • 2351 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A good friend of mine recently recommended me to watch a documentary called “The One Percent.” I do not usually watch documentaries unless I am gaining some type of knowledge out of the information presented. Unsure of what it was about and what I was going to get out of it, I turned on NetFlix and proceeded to watch the film. I soon came to realize I was enamored by this film, “The One Percent,” and it remains one of my favorite documentaries of all time. The documentary deals with the disparity between the wealthy elite and the citizenry and how they are both so far removed from one another. “As of 2010, the top 1% of households (the upper class) owned 35.4% of all privately held wealth.” (Domhoff, 2010, The Wealth Distribution, para. 1). The producer and interviewer presents this film through many wealthy American businessmen, critics, economists and even his own family to explain this major social gap that exists on our home front. When looking at the differences side-by-side, it is hard to grasp that we all live in the same place, the United States of America.…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A crucial controversy of America today is the growing gap between the wealthy and the poor, and the discrepancy is caused by capitalism run wild and only the helping hand of the government can only fix the problem. A question that turns the tables is what if the growing wealth disparity in America is actually caused by the government? For years, the idea that inequality is economically neutral has been the prevailing view not just among traditionalists but also between most Americans outside the further reaches of a political audience. There could be ideological or moral reasons to object to a growing gap between the wealthy and the rest but for economic reasons, there are no such. Furthermore, there are many ways inequality places itself in America. In our society, a good amount of the population is forced to stand up and work for our country while hardly being redeemed for their time and effort, thus the problem of income inequality. An estimate of these people live from paycheck to another, barely coping with life itself, not because they cannot manage their money well, but the reason is that…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays