Analysis Of The Five Arguments Of St. Thomas Aquinas

Each of the five arguments presented by St. Thomas Aquinas aims at helping people from around the world apprehend the existence of God. For instance, the fifth case, which mainly relies on design, utilizes ideas from the governance of the universe to make its stance. It thus maintains that the best explanation of the apparent function and purposefulness to be found in nature is that a vastly intelligent mind created the natural world. Precisely, individuals realize that natural bodies work towards achieving some objectives, but they do not do it by chance. Most of the natural aspects lack intelligence. Therefore, an aspect that requires knowledge must have something knowledgeable to induce directions and lessons. According to Aquinas, God is
Critics wonder what would be the final tip of the universe. In such case, they finalize that having some part of the world as ordered does not guarantee other parts to be ordered. Aquinas talks about all aspects having a purpose and God directing their end, he insists that both design and purpose can only be realized depending on the existence of intelligent beings (Philosophy of Religion, 35). He shows that no plan or purpose can happen without the role of another object that is not within it or an exceptional human being (Philosophy of Religion, 37). Notably, one can look at the way water retains the potential of freezing, but, it needs the temperature to be lowered so that it can freeze. Hence, it is quite difficult to find water that will transform into ice without the impact of heat. The same temperature that will freeze the water also relies on another external influence such as the air pressure. The illustration shows what Aquinas meant by talking about the role of an intelligent being in creating the design. Apparently, human beings assume that they understand different concepts, but the fact is that they rely on assumptions to meet their set objectives. Unlike God, humans have higher chances of
Firstly, through different means, he has proved that order is not an aspect that can be evaluated on probabilistic grounds. God monitors as well as controls the natural order of things by His high intelligence. The happening of the events is far beyond the potential of human beings. Therefore, people who hold that everything works for a means do not take the initiative of understanding that nothing happens by chance, but by design and purpose. Critics should thus stop making people believe that they can induce arrangement and order even with enough time and effort. Also, it is wrong to disputes nature as being purposive. Besides, it is not an assumption. Aquinas has employed various aspects to disapprove the objection; hence people should take the time to evaluate it before making judgments. Through Aquinas’ point of view, it is evident that God is powerful and although human beings may think they reinforce their wellbeing and plans, He plays the biggest role. Precisely, most individuals fail to recognize the participation of God in different scenarios because they cannot see Him. The fact is that He does see everything; hence controlling every outcome is easy. In such case, nature is purposive, and God controls its