this from happening and allow the Hunger-Free Kids Act to be used in its most beneficial way.
this from happening and allow the Hunger-Free Kids Act to be used in its most beneficial way.
How would a student feel if they knew that the USDA allowed the school to provide meals which could make them unhealthy, or even sick? Lunch, as most know, is a very important part of a student’s school day. The food eaten at lunch should provide enough energy to complete the school day as a focused, learning student, and, for some students, to get through after school activities such as athletics and clubs; however, it is being seen more and more often that this is not the case. Chatham County Schools needs to improve its school lunches because the quantity, quality, and cost ratios are inadequate for the success of their students.…
Due to the fact that price exceeds quantity, students are refusing to eat. The National School Lunch Program claims to “provide nutritionally balanced, low-cost or free lunches to more than 31 million children each school day,” (National School Lunch Program 1) but do they mean it? Often times the factor of nutrition is questionable in the food provided in school lunches. An example being one day a student who does not possess the benefit of the National School Lunch Program’s free lunch decides to eat the so-called “nutritionally balanced food” (National School Lunch…
No Kids Hungry is a great organization. Having little or no food is a huge issue in society today. Most children come to school hungry because they do not have enough to eat at home. It is sad that sometimes children only meal is in school. I am glad to hear that this organization provide meals for children outside of school. Not being able to eat a good balance meal can cause health issues and the child will not be able to function on their school work because all they can think about is being hungry. I was also please that No Kids Hungry is making progress in the community level because certain communities need more program and funding than others.…
The need for this program and its awareness is crucial. There are more and more children developing diabetes, and high blood pressure due to obesity. President Barak Obama signed a “Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act” law in 2010. “The program is a nutritional overhaul to school breakfasts and lunches to combat childhood obesity and provide meals at a free or…
Recently there has been revisions to the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and schools were required to overhaul their entire menus to provide the students with healthy and nutritious foods including fruits and vegetables. The new school lunch rules are part of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 which has been implemented this fall. (Post Standard) The Hunger Act allows the USDA the opportunity to make reforms to the school lunch and breakfast programs. With these revisions come strict guidelines from the federal government that each school district must follow in order to receive funding and reimbursement (National School Lunch Program, 2012, August p. 1). In this essay i will be comparing the positive and negative effects of these recent revisions to the NSLP. I will then discuss whether or not these changes are beneficial to the children receiving the meal and whether NSLP is leaving children hungry or helping children make healthy food choices.…
The most obvious change is that a half cup of fruit or vegetables will be served with every lunch. If school districts don’t comply with the new mandates, they won’t be reimbursed by the federal government for their lunch program.The school lunch changes are a responsible response to what health experts call an epidemic.An estimated 23 million children and teens in the U.S. are obese or overweight, a statistic that health and medical experts consider an epidemic. That prevalence puts nearly a third of the country’s kids at early risk of a litany of diseases usually associated with adults with Type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease and even stroke.…
If we do not improve our lunches kids will not have healthy eating habits. If we start eating too much junk food kids will get obese and lazy. The school boards should care about what they are feeding their student.…
To sum up, School lunches are healthy enough because they help foster and low-income children to have meals,it’s helping stop childhood obesity, and helping the government. The low-income children and foster kid will get to eat a healthy lunch and could potentially stop hunger. This plan is beneficial for a national problem, childhood obesity. The government however believes that the government is too controlling and parents can't be trusted. Michelle Obama’s program is very important and they should keep this plan…
“The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) helps provide inexpensive or free school lunch meals to students from low-income families.” (School Lunches: Will new federal nutrition guidelines for school lunches make children healthier? ) It’s helping the children during school to get a quality education and letting them eat healthy food instead of junk food. Pursuing this further “The Guidelines contains the government's nutrition advice for people two years of age and older on the benefits of good eating habits and how to reduce risks for diseases.” ("School Lunches: Will new federal nutrition guidelines for school lunches make children healthier?"). They are preventing the risk of disease with the guidelines so in the future kids can live healthier to have a low chance of diseases. Alternatively though “Other critics caution that students may not opt to buy the healthier school lunches, resulting in smaller school meal subsidies and smaller budgets for schools.” (School Lunches: Will new federal nutrition guidelines for school lunches make children healthier? ) This affects the school because if there is less money for school lunches which would be less food and children wouldn't be satisfied. After all many children develop good eating habits at a young age which would lead them into a healthier person in the…
The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) is the Nation’s second largest food and nutrition assistance program. It has benefited an enormous amount of children suffering from poverty or in households struggling to make ends meet. It has operated in over 101,000 public and nonprofit private schools and, “provided over 28 million low-cost or free lunches to children on a typical school day at a federal cost of $8 billion for the year”. (TNSLP) The main goal on the NSLP as identified by congress is to promote the overall health and well-being of our nations children.…
As the sun shines on the grounds of Ethiopia the thin skeletal bones of the children shifts back and forth hoping to not wake up and experience another day without food. Getting up, and walking miles across the arid wasteland to the nearest aid groups the people of Ethiopia stand in line for ambition. Hope of being rescued. Hope for any kind of save that will allow them to release the pain in them called hunger. Taken by "economist.com" in a nation in the middle of famine , with an empty look in their eyes, and a unfilled stomachs the people of Ethiopia struggles with a curable "disease". At the same time, across the world from the country Ethiopia, the land of America has a different meaning for "hunger", the meaning hunger in America means not having food from the time of breakfast till lunch time. As being compared to Ethiopia where the people there are being tormented by not having food or any kind of nutrients in their bodies for days, hunger also has a different meaning,…
“The National School Lunch Program, established in 1946, is one of the federal government's Oldest and largest food assistance services. About 25 million children at about 93,000 schools get lunch through the program, in public and private schools, and in child care facilities. The program is administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) under its Food and Nutrition Service. Participating schools receive cash subsidies and food donated by the USDA. Schocus must meet various federal requirements”(trum 1). the future of students suffers high blood pressure and other…
The state of school lunches has been a point of debate for many since Michelle Obama’s Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act signed into law December of 2010, giving full authority to the USDA in setting the nutritional standards for all foods regularly sold in school lunch lines, stores, and vending machines. The law was set to provide additional funding to meet the updated standards, however, the cost was severely underestimated. Using data provided by Medicaid, eligibility for the free or reduced school lunch programs has seen a definite increase, although participation has not (Lee, 2010). In a press release, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius was quoted saying “The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act is a significant step forward in our effort to help America's children thrive and grow to be healthy adults... By increasing the number of students eligible to enroll in school meal programs and improving the quality of food served, this legislation simultaneously tackles both hunger and the obesity levels currently affecting too many communities across this nation.” I would like to draw attention to her careful wording of “...step forward in our effort...” A subject as incredibly important as the nutrition of…
This same factor has a ripple effect on the student because it also limits them on what various types of meals they can choose during lunch hour, a poor selection of unhealthy foods leads to poor dieting. “The reimbursement rate for a reduced-price lunch is $2.17 and 24 cents for a paid meal. When you factor in labor and other school costs, schools have less than $1 per day per student to spend on food for lunch”(C.P.F.). Limiting yourself to just $1 dollar to use towards food would be nearly impossible to survive off of, let alone to eat or choose a healthy meal. This not only limits student and young adults of what they are able to eat during lunch if they cannot afford to bring their own lunch, but it also gets them into the habit of making a poor choice in food. “Fewer than 15 percent of the two million American elementary school-aged children eat the recommended five or more daily servings of fruits and vegetables" (Myrdal). If these poor eating habits continue or continue decrease, than the obesity will only continue to grow. In order for our young children of America to begin to change their unhealthy eating habits, parents and other leaders must promote healthy eating habits and explain the importance of proper dieting, which can start by cutting back on processed…
One of the most devastating tragedies that both kills and makes people suffer all over the world is poverty. What many people do not realize is how widespread and serious this issue really is. In the United States one in seven households were food insecure last year which adds up to 17.4 million households and 16 million children facing the devastating effects of hunger. Getting the needed food and nutrition is critical to children's emotional and physical development and if no one tries to help who knows what will become of the millions of children who do not get the food and supplies that is required to live a normal life. Poverty not only effects children, but people in all parts of the United States from the most rural areas to big urban…