The differential experiences between …show more content…
In the United States, white privilege exists due to the constitution that has been designed by the patriarchal and white elite, which has been pushed by a common ruling rationale. The Founding Fathers shared a rationale of opportunistic privileges that reflects in the constitution as favoring white people. The lack of representation of minorities within the constitution and the philosophical stream serves as a vessel for the illegitimacy of other races. The portrayal of western civilization as the epitome of philosophy suggests that it is the only justified form of consciousness. And since the relevancy of minorities is omitted from the philosophical framework, the rationale that grounds the structural hierarchy is flawed. Hence, the dismissal of the other by white thinkers transpires in the biased political structure.
Mills establishes an understanding of the social contract that highlights the rationale behind white supremacy. He shows how the embedded racism of our social constructs created a racial contract. The argument makes an outline that is philosophical and political as well as social. Mills’ work is fundamental in understanding the racial contract as a political system rather than a theoretical scheme. The dichotomy between our idealistic morality and the inequity of our society exemplifies the fails of our system and highlights the existence of a national white