Preview

Analysis Oh Rhetorics

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
334 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Oh Rhetorics
Ugochi Okorafor
Composition and Rhetoric
August, 31, 2012
Analysis of Rhetoric's The tone of voice Brutus used in his speech was subjective and also persuasive. Brutus wanted the citizens to know that he did the right thing by killing Caesar. Brutus specifically states that he killed Caesar for the love of Rome. Brutus also states that Caesar was ambitious, which is used as a negative connotation in the speech. In the speech, Brutus tries to gain the citizens respect while explaining himself. Brutus displayed strong emotions, which is portrayed throughout the whole poem. Brutus wanted the citizens to agree that killing Caesar was a good thing and not a mistake. Also in the speech, Brutus used a lot of rhetorical questions which also helped establish a serious tone. On the other hand, Anthony's speech was not as subjective and serious as Brutus presented. Anthony displays a sly tone when he talks about Caesar. When Anthony says, "I came to bury Caesar not praise him" he is creating a realistic tone for the citizens. Anthony was much calmer in his speech than Brutus was when he stated evident facts. Whereas, Brutus wanted to persuade the citizens. Anthony did not portray a lot of emotions in his speech because he mainly focused on facts. However, Anthony did not really say a lot about the killing. Anthony was very fond of Caesar but not enough to grieve heavily for him. There are in fact keen differences between Brutus and Anthony's speeches. Brutus had plenty more emotions than Anthony. Also, Anthony's speech was not to gain sympathy like Brutus' speech was. The reoccurring commas in Anthony's speech helped establish pauses that created his tranquil yet logic diction. One can believe that Anthony had a more unprepared speech than Brutus because he paused after all the comments from the audience. Between both speeches, there was not a single use of Allusion used. It is evident that the main focus was on the diction and punctuation in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Brutus and Antony’s speeches both men share the strategy of swaying the crowd. In the middle of his speech, Brutus tries to quell the crowd’s anger because “as [Caesar] was valiant [he] honour him”, and because Caesar was “ambitious”, Brutus “slew” him. While speaking to the Roman citizens, Brutus places equal grammatical constructions near each other, and logically appeals to the crowd by showing a cause and effect for the killing of Julius Caesar. Although his efforts are seemingly effective, it is does not have the lasting impact of Antony’s appeals due to the fact that the roman people are not rational, because their emotions are running high. Antony states that Caesar “hath brought many captives” to Rome, “wept” when the poor cried, and “thrice presented him” a crown which he refused. Antony’s explicit details provide examples of Caesar’s good deeds, which logically appeals to the crowd, and renders Anthony’s sympathy toward Caesar justified. Although Antony also applies logical rhetoric to his oration, his strategy is more effective than Brutus’s because Brutus provided hypothetical details of Caesar’s misdoings, while Antony shares his specific memories of Caesar’s kindness and humility. Therefore, Antony’s strategy suggested Brutus and his fellow conspirators committed an unjust crime toward Caesar, and established a stronger impact on the crowd’s attitude.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus and Antony each gave their own speeches at Julius Caesar’s funeral to persuade the people of Rome to make them their new leader by using many rhetorical devices. Brutus came off as a traitor of Caesar, claiming that they killed Julius Caesar for the sake of Rome. He tried to overthrow what had occurred by striking fear into the people’s eyes, stating “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” By letting the people of Rome envision what horrible things and events would unfold if Caesar was still alive and ruler. He also uses fallacy to allow the audience to think about what their lives would be like tied down under Caesar’s rule then what it will be like with Caesar gone and…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric is the aim of persuading the audience by using reading, writing and speaking through communication. It gives us a better understand how and why we respond to certain messages. Also how we are persuaded to believe what we believe, and how we can persuade others to share our beliefs. Rhetoric involves how to make arguments and what kind of writing will make you argument most convince your audience or reader. Andrea Lunsford, professor of English at Sanford University said that getting your message across in a way that ethically persuades your audience. It also means protecting yourself from harmful massages and this requires critically evaluating the rhetoric we encounter through the myriad mediums of communication that surround us…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus’s speech is delivered in prose, a somewhat unpolished and unsophisticated manner of speaking. The use of prose in this instance appeals to the audience as they are able to directly relate to this manner of speaking, being of a somewhat lower class, thus allowing Brutus to connect with them on a higher level. He also arouses patriotism and plays on the rights to civil freedom of the audience to offer further persuasiveness to his speech. He does this by inferring logical and restrained reasoning for Caesar’s death which appeals to the audience’s intelligence and commonsense. The high modality of the rhetorical question “Who is here so vile that will not love his country?” is extremely powerful in agitating the existing devotion the audience has towards Rome. Similarly in the essay Arguments against…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, Brutus had the better speech. Brutus is saying he had to kill Caesar in order to make a free and prosperous country. He included that he was a close friend to Caesar and he was sad to see him go, but he had to for the best. In Brutus’s speech he said he loved Caesar, but not enough to let Rome…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric Analysis

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Authors Becky Herz, and Kim Phuc wrote essays that not only touched hearts, but also made people take a different look at life and those around them. “The Long Road to Forgiveness” and “My Husband Will Call Me Tomorrow” are two essays that use literary devices such as pathos, imagery, ethos, and repetition to effectively tell their stories. By using different rhetorical and literary devices in their writing they were able to make an impact with their words. Words are very powerful weapons in the battle of making a point and trying to make sure that people actually understand that same point. In Herz’s “My Husband Will Call Tomorrow” she was able to use repetition as well as visual devices to effectively tell her story. Her use of these devices allows the reader to be able to connect and see things from her level. Phuc’s essay on the other hand, was able to evoke gut-wrenching emotion, just using devices such as imagery and details about to make her story credible.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Barack Obama is the 44th president of the United States. President Obama was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961. In his 2012 “State of the Union Address,” Obama announces a clearly defined for government to take conveys in repairing an economy that works for all Americans and to renew the engagement of many united politics that performed him to the White House in 2008. Many of the particular measured he requested are liable to resound with the community, it remains to be apprised whether he can convince the plurality of Americans to set nearby their decay distrust of government and offer him decree to follow an active rule.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marc Antony’s funeral speech captured the audience’s attention even after Marcus Brutus had given his argument. His words were precise and well thought out. He not only appealed logically to the citizens of Rome, but emotionally as well. Furthermore, his use of sarcasm was highly effective and persuaded the audience to riot against Brutus even though he appeared like he supported the conspirators side. Brutus’ speech was persuasive of his cause, he even questioned the audience as to taking his own life if what they thought he had done was unjust. The citizens of Rome were ready to accept their new leaders from the argument Brutus had given, but Antony rose to the occasion and made the confused people of Rome realize that what Brutus and the conspirators had done was wrong. Antony did a superior job against Brutus of persuading the citizens that Brutus was guilty of wrongful murder and that Caesar loved them.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everything that was said by Brutus was completely blown away by what Antony says even though he never said anything bad about Brutus. Brutus and Antony are both very good at ethos, pathos and logos, but with the length and persistence of Antony, he won the crowd. By the end of the speech the people of Rome wanted to kill everyone that was in the conspiracy including…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before his speech begins, the whole crowd is going wild with overwhelming support for Brutus. Knowing this, Antony is quickly able to capture the attention of the people by saying, “For Brutus’ sake, I am beholding to you” (64). By starting off with saying that Brutus endorses whatever Antony is able to say, they are suddenly more curious to hear what he say and what exactly their beloved Brutus approves of. By saying this, Antony is able to borrow Brutus’ honest reputation and use it as his own. Towards the end of his speech, Antony borrows Caesar’s renewed ethos, once again merging voices and giving Antony even more credibility. He asks the audience, “Wherein hath Caesar thus deserved your love?” (234). Antony successfully borrows Caesar’s great reputation and increases his credibility for the people to trust him.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to be a successful persuasive speaker you need to use the rhetorical appeal, logos. Logos uses inductive or deductive reasoning by citing statistics, facts, experts and evidence. The claim or thesis of each speaker of Brutus was that Caesar deserved to be killed while Antony’s claim was that Caesar was a respectable person and didn’t deserve to be killed. An example of Brutus using logos to persuade his audience is: “The question of his death is enrolled in the Capitol; his glory not extenuated, wherein he was worthy…” (108 line 33-34) A better example of a speaker using logos came from Antony’s speech: “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?” (112 line 91-92) Antony overall uses the rhetorical appeal, logos, better.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I believe that the rhetorical strategy of narration is both seen differently in the article, “Unnatural Killers”, by John Grisham and the article, “The Case Against College Athletic Recruiting” by Ben Adler. Both appeal emotionally to the reader but one is a lot more logical in its approach then the other.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Well-known Sci-fi writer, Ray Bradbury, in his novel, Fahrenheit 451, illustrates that relationships reflect who individuals are and who they want to be. Bradbury’s purpose is to promote the idea that a person should have the courage to listen to their own beliefs and thoughts of happiness rather than to blend in with society. He adopts a disoriented and poetic tone in order to appeal to similar feelings and experiences on a non-realistic scale in his young adult readers.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus and Antony both use different rhetorical techniques to persuade the crowd at Julius Caesar's funeral. However, the arguments can be very different and one speech can be more persuasive than the other. Brutus's and Antony's speech have a different base on the same topic and both have a valid point in each. Brutus lectures about how Caesar is a courageous person. Antony, however, discourses about how Caesar is determined and how Brutus transferred captives home to Rome. Antony also speaks about how Caesar was a faithful man to Rome and to what degree he paid for his fault. Brutus talks about Caesar's honor and if Caesar was dead, then Rome would be complimentary.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays