Preview

Analysis Soft Drink

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
322 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Soft Drink
1 Analysis of the U.S. soft drink industry, based on the competitive forces model of Michael Porter.

In the soft drink industry the entry of new competitors depends on the barriers to entry that are present, and also the reaction from existing competitors that the entrant can expect.

I will now analyze the six major sources of barriers to entry the soft drink industry.

Economies of scale deter entry by forcing the entrant to come in at large scale and risk strong reaction from existing firms or come in at a small scale and accept a cost disadvantage. If a company wants to decline its unit costs of their product, they will have to produce more to lower the cost. The more you produce, the lower the costs.

In the soft drink industry establishing firms have brand identification and customer loyalties. The brand name can have differences. This is a high barrier to enter. Entrants are forced to spend a lot to overcome existing customer loyalties.

The capital requirements within this industry are very high. Production, distribution and advertising are a must to compete with the industry leaders like coca cola and Pepsi. So if a new

The aluminum cans, plastic and glass bottles are pretty much dependant on the soft drink industry to survive in the business. This makes suppliers to have little power over the soft drink industry.

The access to distribution channels is a high barrier because the most successful soft drink companies are aggressively spending their distribution channels and buying full ownership of bottling plants. Supermarkets are at present the largest channels in the U.S. and there the competition is very high.

Switching costs is also a barrier to entry this business. Switching costs by changing from one supplier to the other may happened. Also employee training, new equipment, testing new technology. This things are common in this industry. This are barriers for new

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Monopoly and Fair Return

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The major barriers to entry in an industry are economies of scale, legal barriers such as patents & licenses and other strategic or pricing barriers.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Five Forces (Coke Wars)

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The soft drink industry can be described as a Duopoly since Pepsi and Coke are the two firms competing. The market share of the rest of the industry is too small to be a factor. The competition between the companies has never…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cola wars continue

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the 5-forces model, each industry’s profitability can be assessed considering the five forces that influence the market – The rivalry among existing competitors, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of new entrants, and threat of substitute products or services. Considering the rivalry among existing competitors, the rivalry is very intense. Among national concentrate producers, Coke and Pepsi claimed a combined 72% of the U.S. CSD market’s sales volume. The Cola war has begun in 1950s and the competition is still ongoing. Also, the competitions in other sectors of drinks and between small concentrate producers were harsh.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The barriers are high. They can be up-front advertising, R&D cost, bottling lines equipment, and brand awareness. Firstly, megabrands such as Coke and Pepsi already take about 60% market share, left fierce competition to the other brands. Secondly, On supply-side economies of scale, the megabrands such as Coke and Pepsi already take about 60% market share and the larger volumes of products to spread fixed cost over more units. Thirdly, on demand-side benefits of scale, the impact of brand reputation is huge, for customers are more willing to buy products of megabrands. Coke and Pepsi spent $244,000 and $140,000 on average each year in 2008 and 2009,which could be an unaffordable up-front cost for new entrant.…

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Carbonated Soft Drink (CSD) industry is a profitable one despite the “Cola Wars” between the two largest players – Coke and Pepsi. Such profitability can be understood by analyzing the CSD’s industry structure in terms of “Porter’s five forces.”…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The bargaining power of suppliers is low. Most of the materials for producing soft drink are commodities such as sweetener, aluminum cans, and plastic bottles etc. Coke and Pepsi have the freedom to select the suppliers. They face low switching cost, which allow them to change its suppliers easily without any price difference. Thus, the suppliers of the commodities have virtually no bargaining power over pricing.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Michael Porter developed five different forces in a framework he felt influenced industries. This framework was designed to help companies find ways to off-set a rival company and to help develop a more solid business plan. It has been known over the years a rivalry has existed been two of the biggest soda companies, Coca Cola and Pepsi. Three of Porter’s forces that are exemplified in this “coke war” are buyer power, barriers to entry, and rivalry which will be explained and elaborated on in the following essay.…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our competitors will be large producers of soft drinks such as Coca-Cola with Minute Maid products and PepsiCo with Tropicana products. The Coca-Cola Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc hold respectively 13.1% and 6.4% of the fruits juices market. Coca-Cola is the world’s biggest soft drink company with more than 500 brands, including 17 brands that produce more than a billion dollars in income (Slcher, 2015). PepsiCo cl has 22 brands that create more than a billion dollars in income. Both organizations spend tremendous measures of cash on advancement, publicizing and advertising, and on fortifying their transportation system. According to Grewal and Levy, since 2010 Coca-Cola and its packaging partners have put more than $50 billion in new offices, dispersion framework, gear, and retail client enactments. PepsiCo spent in 2013 about 5.9% of its net income on promoting and showcasing (Grewal & Levy, 2010). Both organizations have wide geographic visibility around the country and internationally. Thus, LaMarquise will be threatening companies such as Sunmet, Tree Top, etc. which are our direct competitors in the market of concentrated fruit juices. So, through our strategy, we show our product as unique and different from other companies’ product (Bailey,…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are some barriers for new entering concentrate producers. First, existing bottlers in the soft drink industry may not agree to bottle the new entrants especially if they have contracts or partnership with other companies. Second, the brand recognition among consumers requires investment in advertising and other promotional activities. Create a brand image takes years and the potential returns may be earned in long term. New entrant needs to have financial stability to stand in the market over a long period of time.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Supply-side economies of scale: Occurs when firms that produce larger volumes enjoy lower cost per unit, because they can spread high fixed costs over a large number of units, or have more efficient technology, or can command better terms from suppliers.…

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are great barriers to entry when trying to dive into the soft drink industry, and because of this companies who have a competitive advantage will make it rather difficult for a new competitor to enter the market. Brand Equity is the first of many barriers, because large companies like…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Especially in the force of rivalry (one of the 5 forces), you must identify the market size, growth rate, profit margins, what are the main categories in the alternative drink industry, who are the major competitors and their relative sizes, the competition scope, the main competition weapons)…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MARKET ANALYSIS AND IDENTIFICATION OF MARKET OPPORTUNITIES Companies in the soft drink manufacturing industry are facing intense competition from the domestic and foreign brands,resulting in rising promotional costs and sinking profit margins.The consumers are going for real “value” for their money ,choosing drinks with better health value.Acurrent ban on sales of carbonates shows in the trend analysis given below:- {draw:frame} COMPANY GROWTH RATE Our company has shown a declining growth rate due to change in value perception and behavioural differences of consumers due to governmental bans all over the country.A public clarification would help us change the consumer perception.We need to make our core value based products to be fresh and relevant.We also need to sharpen our focus in this industry for maximum effect. {draw:frame} The trends of our own product offerings in the market are shown in the graph as below.Here we can notice a declining trend. {draw:frame} This declining trend can also be seen as a loss of our market segment to healthier drink options like fuit juices and water .It is quite evident in the graph given below:- {draw:frame} High sales volume in the water drinking segment and health juice segment shows that customer want better value and there perception is based on the changes in the microenvironment brought about by our competitors.There is a possibility of high “customer churn” in the future as our company’s sales decline.A 5 percent reduction in the customer defection rate can increase profits by 25 percent to 85 percent.According to the expectancy value model we ned to look into altering the beliefs about our brand which is effected by physical risk perceptions.Here we are seeing intense segment rivalry in our eange of products.Also there is lower entry barrier.The companies point of view needs to be visible on active information search.A customer’s decision to be loyal or defect from buying our products depends upon the large…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For competitive success in the alternative beverage industry, PepsiCo’s key success factors are product innovation and differentiation.…

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marketing Plan of Coca Cola

    • 6018 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Table 7 :Average prices of soft drinks in the UK in £ per litre, 2001-06…

    • 6018 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays