Preview

Analytical Essay FINAL

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
985 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analytical Essay FINAL
Arylle Ng
Mrs. Chung
October 27, 2014
English II
“The Characters’ Views on Acceptance of Those Different From Them” All human beings judge other people based on who they are. People judge others because they are somewhat different from them. Being judgmental is the basis part of human nature. Despite our flaw as human beings, Barbara Jordan comments on the collection “Ourselves and Others” that, “We, as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves.” This quote plays out in the texts “Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion” by William J. Brennan, “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, and “My So-Called Enemy” by Lisa Gossels. The characters in these texts deal differently toward those who are different from them. As the authors portray their characters’ views on acceptance, the authors’ views on acceptance are also revealed to the readers. While some show acceptance toward others, some have a harder time accepting and choose to discriminate. For this reason, the quote by Barbara Jordan plays out varyingly in the texts chosen from the collection. The people in the text, Texas V. Johnson Majority Opinion, are accepting of those different from them. The characters in the text express their own opinions through their actions. One of the characters, Judge Brennan, shows what he think is right by supporting the 1st Amendment. The U.S Supreme Court claimed that the man’s expression of burning the flag is protected and legal according to the U.S constitution. As said on line 3-5, “To say that the government has an interest in encouraging proper treatment of the flag, however it is not to say to punish a person for burning a flag as means of the 1st Amendment.” The Supreme Court discriminated Gregory Johnson by arresting him without the consent of the 1st Amendment. They discriminated him due to the fact that his actions were cruel to think that he had violated a state law, which is said to be illegal to destroy the items that should be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The nature of the Pentium flaw was in the floating – point math subsection. In certain conditions, low order bits of the result of floating-point division operations would be incorrect. This would lead to an error that will quickly compound in operations to larger errors when future calculations were completed.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The respondent was convicted in Dallas County Criminal Court of desecration of a venerated object in violation of a Texas statute. He was sentenced to one year in prison and fined $2000. The respondent appealed his conviction through the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas. They affirmed the decision of the lower court. The respondent then petitioned for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. This court then reversed the decision finding Johnson’s flag burning to be “symbolic speech” protected by the First Amendment. Certiorari was granted. The case went to the Supreme Court.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This appeal, made on May 8, 1985 would be titled as Texas vs. Johnson. The defense argued that Johnson was prosecuted in violation of the first Amendment, clearly states that no law may take away a person's freedom of speech or expression, and of the Bill of Rights and the free speech clause of the Texas Constitution. Johnson argued that in his opinion, flag burning is part of freedom of expression. In Johnson's defense, he stated that "the American Flag was burned as Ronald Reagan was being re-nominated as President and a more powerful statement of symbolic speech, whether you agree with it or not, couldn't have been made at that time…" To the surprise of many people, on April 20, 1988 the Texas court of criminal appeals declared by a vote of 5 – 4 that the original decision was unconstitutional and that Texas violated his first amendment right of freedom of…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Texas V Johnson was a supreme court decision involving Gregory Lee Johnson and the state of Texas. This decision happened in 1989 on June, 21. The court ruled that flag burning is protected under the first amendment therefore it is not considered illegal. This decision is important because it sets a precedent for the future of protest and free “speech” including non-oral speech in the first amendment. I am interested in this case because I believe flag burning should be illegal and punishable by jail which is opposite of the ruling in this decision. I am interested in learning the other side of the argument and expanding my knowledge beyond just my opinion. (Texas v Johnson, Wikipedia)…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Keyssar has used many different types of Qualifiers. He stated “Nowhere is that more evident –or more relevant;regarding the panics and depressions that have been a feature in the American economic life for over two centuries”.…

    • 575 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Critcal Analsis Essay

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Preview: The author of “The Knock” is Brian Doyle who went to school at the University of Notre Dame and now living in Portland, Oregon. In my opinion I think this story was directed to everyone in general, to inform others what some soldier do for a living. After reading this passage I thought it was pretty interesting. I felt like I learn something new, we were in Doyle’s friend view and got to see/feel what he saw and how he felt doing this for a living.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas V. Johnson Analysis

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Johnson the court said the flag was in no immediate danger because of Johnson’s conduct. Burning the flag was brought up as expressive conduct so they could not permit him with any punishment in the court of law. As stated above, that would be going against the first amendment. Although, many were seriously offended by his actions the court was not obligated to give him a proper punishment for his foolish actions. “ The way to preserve the flag’s special role is not to punish those who feel differently about these matter” lines 37 and 38 in the excerpt. The flag is a representation of national pride and they did not feel as if burning the flag would change views on national pride. The government was trying to inforce proper treatment of the flag but his actions were protected by the principals of the first amendment. The view of acceptance was heavily carried throughout this document, the court accepted what he believed and let him go on with his life with doing and those…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The other reason he was justified in his actions was that it was only a state law. There were a couple of states that allowed burning the flag, but Texas did not. The state shouldn’t be allowed to make a law that overrules the country’s amendments. Justice Brennan said, “…no official, high or petty can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinions or force citizens to confess by word…” This quote shows that state shouldn’t be allowed to make a decision based on opinions that force people to abide.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay Analysis

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many Americans are discovering the value of locally or own grown food. By doing this, they help reduce the carbon print while at the same time supporting local business (Elton). The general concern posed by the writer in this article is how the local-foods movement is gradually becoming a global trend. As the author sites how the movement is steadily growing, he also expresses his concerns regarding it. Without proper standards to oversee the movement, the author expresses fear that it will decline sharply.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grade analysis results show that school success in Croatian and English is very good, but through years of schooling that success slowly decreases. This is especially emphasized in the fourth grade, where the fall in success is the most obvious. Teachers attribute that to the development phase that children are in. Moreover, they say it is due to more difficult curriculum in the fourth grade.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Analytical Essay 2

    • 1465 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This analytical article is based on the work of Mike Rose and Maya Angelou. The main theme of this essay hovers around the two of the works –“I Just Want to Be Average” and “Graduation” - by Mike Rose and Maya Angelou. Furthermore, a general description of this essay and the relationship between the both is the discussion of this essay. However, this is done with an analysis of the complimentary effect of one on another and ultimately how both of these works make the whole image pertaining to the life of a type school student.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the block quotation above, readers learn that the Wife of Bath describes lying as a form of art. A wise wife must be manipulative—must show their husband that they are powerful. The Wife of Bath’s goal is to give an advice to the women who are not wise—unable to manipulate their husband. Line 230 translates to the following: now listen to how I have conducted myself (Benson). Readers get the opportunity to learn that the Wife of Bath is a powerful manipulator who is attempting to teach other wives how to conduct themselves. Line 231 translates to the following: to the wise wives that are able to understand me (Benson). This line enables the readers to realize that the Wife of Bath is a woman who will refuse to repeat her advice—her audience consists of wives that are able to understand her effectively. Line 232 translates to the following: you should speak to your husband by accusing him wrongfully (Benson). This line allows wives who are not wise to learn how to make their…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us humans should accept Johnson in “ Texas v Johnson” even though his expressions differ from one another. On pages 1 and 2 of page 1, stated “ We decline therefore, to create for the flag an exception to the joust of principles protected by the 1st amendment.” On the next page, line 39 stated, “ The way to preserve the flags special role is not to punish those who feel differently about these matters.” This evidence helped decide the rational decision to not punish Johnson. It relates to the quote because it’s saying he has a right in the 1st amendment to express by burning the flag. Also we should punish those who have different opinions and views than ourselves.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shirley Jackson Argument

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    No matter what the topic is, there will always be someone who disagrees with your perspective and view on certain subjects, but instead of trying to convince them otherwise, the only thing you can do is accept it. “We, as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves.” Stated by Barbara Jordan. In the texts, “What, of This Goldfish Would You Wish for?” short story by Etgar Keret, “American Flag States for Tolerance” a newspaper editorial by Ronald J. Allen, and “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson also a short story, by Shirley Jackson. The texts can relate or contradict the quote about the idea of acceptance. It also discusses and identifies the differences, or similarities, in the people that are explored in…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upshaw, Ed Earl. (October, 2012). Discussion of “Flag Burning is a Freedom That We Must Respect” article. [Flag burning in a public protest is a deliberate attempt to provoke a reaction…When it is successful, why hold the provoked person responsible...The 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of speech, but it doesn 't guarantee freedom from foreseeable consequences]. Retrieved from: http://www.policymic.com/articles/15574/flag-burning-is-a-freedom-that-we-must-respect…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays