The leaders of government were lead to believe that the peasants acted upon the will of God. (Document 1 Leonhard von Eck) The peasants themselves claimed that their reasons were behind God. They would serve the authority of God, but obviously they did not believe the upper class was acting very "holy" to them. They would listen as long as the lords would promise them release from serfdom as God would want them to. (Document 3 Peasant Parliament of Swabia to the Memmingmen Town Council) Christianity was truly a strong influence on the peasants. A preacher would tell them that if they did not rebel against the lords, they were going against God's will. (Document 6 Thomas Muntzer)Religion was only an excuse to rebel. The real cause of the revolts was the royal oppression the peasants suffered. They were doing more work than they were being compensated for. Lords were breaking the agreement by forcing more services upon the peasants without compensation. (Document 2 Sebastian Lotzer) The peasants believed that the rich should share their wealth with the poor. (Document 8 Lorenz Fries) Prosperous men did not agree because they believed it would result in a troublesome outcome. Moreover, even the government admitted to the unfair treatment of the peasants. "The authorities have torn out the hair of their subjects", instead of helping them and protecting them. (Document 9 Caspar Nutzel)The empire saw their society be disrupted, their economy dwindling, and their authority disrespected. They chose to respond in several ways, but none were effective peaceful responses. One response was to settle the matter through financial terms. If the peasants agreed to pay a reasonable amount of money to the council they would be released from serfdom. (Document 4 Reply of the Memmingen Town Council) These terms did not settle the issue because the peasants would not pay their lords a cent to be set free. It is clear the peasants would not comply because a month later after the reply, they captured the countess and her children of Weinsburg. (Document 5 Pastor Johann Herolt) When a financial agreement did not work, the government turned to settling the matter through religion. A theoligan tried to convince people that peasants who commited violent acts and worked with Thomas Muntzer were evil and were working for the devil. Nevertheless, the peasants continued to revolt. They chose to rob the nobility's houses and burn them down.(Document 11 Count Wilhelm von Henneberg) Drastic measures taken by the peasants struck the economy and honor of the upper classes. Consequently, the government had to respond with equivalent drastic measures. During a gathering in Swabia, more than 100,000 rebels were killed and the revolts were suppressed. Such an event comes to show how little control the authorities had that they had to resort to intense violence. The imperial authority let the subjects be restored back to an honorable state if they agreed to surrender unconditionally and were punished. (Document 12 Decree of the Imperial Diet) With this agreement in a way the peasants got what they wanted.
In document 7, Martin Luther a preacher for the Protestants and a theologian, speaks against the peasants. He speaks without being able to empathize with the purposes the peasants have for their actions; for he has never suffered the life of a peasant or a poor class. However, his influence is great among the townspeople for he is a prominent religious leader. He can influence many against the peasants, which is an impediment to their cause. Furthermore, in Document 10, Christoffel von Lichtenstein, a nobleman, has a different take on the issue of the revolts than most upper classmen. He writes for leniency to Count Wilhelm for the peasants. The power of the revolts is shown through the experience of Lord with the peasants and how he had to swear an oath to them. His encounter with their parents allows him to empathize with them and it shows the kind of consequences noblemen faced during these harsh times.
(DBQ Euro History) (The Western Civilization)
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Why: peasants wanted to end serfdom, taxation, military conscription, and wanted to abolish landed aristocracy.…
- 2110 Words
- 13 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
DESCRIPTION: German Peasants were fighting German Nobles due to been displeased with their economic and social situation.…
- 485 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
1. In shaping the course of the Thirty Years’ War, the relative importance was influenced both by religious rivalries such as the threats proposed between Calvinism and Catholicism, and dynastic ambitions like the desire to confront the threats of the growing Hapsburg power and the vision to expand one’s own power within the empire.…
- 907 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
pushed Luther and the German nobility to revolt against not only Rome but Rome’s secular ally, the Holy Roman Emperor.…
- 3673 Words
- 16 Pages
Good Essays -
During 1524-1526 many peasant revolts occurred within the German states primarily caused by the confusion of Lutheran teachings and ideologies. In documents 1, 3 and 6 demonstrate how the peasants unified through Lutheran teachings and how it was used to explain the German serf uprising. In an official report from Leonardo Von Eck clearly states that the peasant’s demands come from “the word of god” in which shows that the peasant revolts root cause comes from Lutheran teachings and that religion is the driving force of these revolts since it led to a retaliation against the oppressor which are the lords and nobility (Doc.1). Leonardo Von Eck a chancellor of Bavaria a clearly a noble would likely be a biased view since he is trying to protect his own class from the peasants and also because he is more concerned in maintaining order and peace since he is a government official also but thus he also expresses a factual fact about the driving force of the peasant uprising. Another source that will reconfirm the views of Von Eck is from a group of Swabian peasants in which visibly asserts that god had renew them and given them the inner strength to stand up for themselves since it was a shame that they had to serve as slaves but also iterates their willingness to obey religious powers (Doc 3). The demands of the Peasant parliament of Swabia that was written in the Articles of the Peasants of Memmingen to the Memmingen Town Council is a reliable source since we can presume that these views are the same views of the serfs of that region. In document 6 a source who is…
- 919 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Documents 1, 4, and 5 explained the point of view of the nobility which mostly all of the nobility agreed it was negative. In Document 1the Chancellor of Bavaria wrote how he believed that the revolt was simply the belief of the time and that's why so many peasants were following the same belief. Yet the chancellor doesn't realize the side of the peasant who strive for a better life for themselves, they simply want to have more rights for the individuality. In document 4 it explains how they have not reach any religious achievements, so for their freedom they must give a large amount of money to buy their freedom. As for document 5 a pope explains how the peasants are more like salvages and act very ruthless during their revolt. All 3 of these documents are more than likely extremely biased since the nobility only wanted to better themselves and nobody else.…
- 545 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
What was it like to be a peasant in fifteenth-century Germany? Explain the peasant worldview as described by Wunderli.…
- 1816 Words
- 8 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Peasantry was controlled by taxes. Peter the Great was known to tax men who insisted on having beards. If a male tried to leave to avoid paying taxes he would just tax the whole village where the male lived. This encouraged the peasants to keep people from fleeing. He subdivided estates again, also he reduced taxes on…
- 761 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
From 1524 to 1526 peasant revolts were occurring throughout the German states. Many causes and responses brewed out of these revolts. One cause is from religion issues (1,3,6) , Luther’s idea of equality. Another cause is the peasant gaining power (2,8,9). As a result of these causes came out response, the most common response was riots and chaos (5,11,7). These revolts would end in thousands of rebel deaths and others are also killed.…
- 926 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Wars of Religion in the 17th and 18th centuries were some of the bloodiest conflicts of all of European history before the World Wars. They spanned the entire continent, involved nearly every member of society, and resulted in the deaths of millions. Reactions to these wars varied– some were in favour, some were opposed. However, despite the fact that people’s reactions deviated wildly, the evidence shows that many rulers had a similar attitude towards the Wars of Religion, and manipulated them for the benefit of themselves or their country.…
- 1104 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
1. German princes: Luther’s Reformation = more power for princes. They have greater control of political affairs and national…
- 4158 Words
- 17 Pages
Good Essays -
DESCRIPTION: The Peasants' War was a revolt of German peasants who were fighting German nobles because they were unhappy with their economic and social situation.…
- 1922 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
(Pg. 77, 110) 2. Luther did not support the rebellion and continually condemned the peasants harshly for their actions against the state. Luther claimed that insurrection is not something that God tolerates because man solely becomes judge, jury, and executioner. (Pg. 58) 3. Luther is not to blame for the Peasants’ War, but rather it is the temporal state who should be held responsible.…
- 520 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The primary influence of the peasant revolts was religious. Through religion, and the nobles, many attempted to maintain a status quo by defining God’s will through their point of view. In March of 1525, the Peasant Parliament of Swabia wrote to the Memmingen Town Council. The parliament stated their religious view that both the peasants and the Emperor have been redeemed with His precious blood. They believe that the “Christian Lords”, will release them from serfdom, and they will be willingly obedient to “fair and reasonable” authority (Doc 3). Through a 3rd party, the peasants explained their grievances and made a point of compromising. A letter written to the people of Allstedt, from the preacher Thomas Muntzer, expressed “God’s will” to be the uprising of peasants through the revolt. He pushed the people of Allstedt to conform to the peasant’s violent resistance of serfdom (Doc 6). This theologians biased view of religious ideology, intensely recruited those in favor of the revolt. The Town Council of Memmington replied to an article concerning serfdom, by reminding the serfs that “the serfdom of a Christian is no hindrance to the salvation of his soul”. They paid large sums of money for the serfs, and under the “council’s good will”, they should pay large sums to be released from…
- 819 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Describe Europe during the crisis period of 1560-1650. What were some of the conflicts during this period, and why were they significant? In your opinion, did the Witchcraft Trials play a significant role during this crisis period, and why or why not?…
- 260 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays