Preview

Analyze The Consequences Of The North And South After The Civil War

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
115 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyze The Consequences Of The North And South After The Civil War
The Civil War ended in April of 1865, and it left many things behind to be dealt with. There were many issues, and in a lot of them the North and South had different point of views. Although the North was very rich, the South was tremendously poor. Despite the result of the Civil War, the Union acted like they were in control, and the South couldn’t do anything about it. One controversy that the North had was if they should allow the Southern states govern themselves. The North should not let the states in the South lead their own government. It would be too dangerous and would be a major setback toward the North.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Killer Angels (Civil War Paper) Essay Example
    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Killer Angels (Civil War Paper) Essay Example

    The propaganda pitch the Union gave was they were fighting to free the slaves. This was not true! It was said Southerners were fighting to preserve slavery. This is also a false statement. Roughly less than 6% of all Southerners owned slaves. In fact, there were a substantial amount of generals in the Union army that owned slaves themselves. In addition the constitution protected slavery. If the true issue was to maintain slavery the South would not have seceded. The most obvious myth is that the "good" North marched into the "cruel and evil" South for the sole purpose of freeing the slaves. There are many quotes from Northern leaders that show clearly that the main purpose of the North was not the eradication of slavery, but subjugation of the southern people. Slavery was used to rally the Northern population behind Abraham Lincoln's war. It was an emotional issue, sure some Yankees joined and fought to "set men free", but most were there to preserve the union. Preserving the Union meant stepping on the Southern people and keeping them as a tax base to feed Northern industrialists. An interesting conflict of Northern morals is discovered. The North…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sectionalism Apush Mid - Term Exam Essay
    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sectionalism Apush Mid - Term Exam Essay

    In the years before the Civil War the political power in the Federal government was changing. Northern and mid-western states were becoming more and more powerful as the populations increased. Southern states lost political power because the population did not increase as rapidly. Southerners believed that state laws carried more weight than Federal laws, and they should abide by the…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq 1850's
    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dbq 1850's

    The Constitution can be interpreted in many different ways, which leads to sectional discord and tension. For many reasons, the South evidently did not…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain The Southern Economy In The Years Following The Civil War
    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain The Southern Economy In The Years Following The Civil War

    Describe the Southern economy in the years following the Civil War. The American economy has been experiencing significant change on the eve of the Civil War. What had been a simply horticultural economy in 1800 was in the principal phases of a modern insurgency which would bring about the United States getting to be plainly one of the world's driving mechanical powers by 1900. Be that as it may, the beginnings of the modern unrest in the prewar years was only restricted to the areas north of the Mason-Dixon line, leaving a great part of the South a long ways behind. In 1860, the South was still prevalently rural, profoundly subordinate upon the offer of staples to a world market.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Civil War
    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Civil War

    President Abraham Lincoln did not believe that the south could legally secede from union because the states could not get rid of a government they made without collapsing anarchy. Lincoln called the Union a “contract” (Lincoln 2) between the states and the contract could not be dissolved without the consent of all the states. Since the North did not believe the southern slave states had ample reason to secede, all the states were not in accord, so the “contract” (Lincoln 2) was still valid. If the legal matter was not reason enough against secession, the resulting anarchy from a new government should have been a deterrent. The federal government was not able to please everyone, but no government would be able to please everyone. If the new southern government could form on basis of pleasing everyone, it would dissolve into chaos. The new government would be mob rule and it would encourage other factions to break off from the union if they became dissatisfied. It would plunge both countries into a mad power scramble and it could not be allowed even if it was legal, which it was…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In What Way the African Americans Shaped the Course and Consequences of the Civil War? Confine Your Answer to the Years from 1861 and 1870.
    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In What Way the African Americans Shaped the Course and Consequences of the Civil War? Confine Your Answer to the Years from 1861 and 1870.

    Immediately after the election and inauguration of Abraham Lincoln, the newly-established Republican Party’s presidential nominee, eleven states of the South seceded from the Union. These events marked the beginning of the Civil War and the war was a result of many political tensions that had emerged between the North and the South in the prior decades, all of which were associated with the institution of slavery installed in the Southern United States. President Lincoln began the Civil War with the South in response to states’ secession from the Union, and therefore, the war was not solely concentrated over the issue of slavery in American society. The North fought to preserve the Union while the Confederacy fought to protect states’ rights. The contributions of African Americans for the Union war effort in the Civil War pushed the federal government, controlled largely by the Republican Party, to fundamentally change the purpose of the war itself, changing the course of the conflict, and therefore, the social and political consequences that followed in the Reconstruction Era.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Second American Revolution Dbq Analysis
    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Second American Revolution Dbq Analysis

    The Civil War left a great impact on the nation. President Lincoln stated that he had no intention of interfering with slavery but the south had no actual right to secede from the Union. When South Carolina was the first state to secede and other states quickly followed, Lincoln felt that he had to take matters into his own hands and enacted his power as both the Commander in Chief and the Chief Executive. We see in Document A that South Carolina felt differently about this issue. They felt that there isn't anything…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Civil War: the Confederate-Southern Perspective
    • 1848 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Civil War: the Confederate-Southern Perspective

    We are often taught in grade school the Union (or Northern view) of the Civil War because that is who won the war. In retrospect, both sides should be taught in American history, since, after all, this was a war with ourselves over differences. How different the nation would be if the South had won. Would we still engage in slavery? Would the United States have a completely different moral and ethical code in business? What of the impact of religion? Politically, how would our nation then be ran? These are just a few of the questions raised as I began my journey in search of Confederate ideals and Southern reasons for the war. In every story, there are three sides. With the Civil War, there is the Northern side, the Southern side and then there is the truth. While not all truths may be discovered, my purpose here to is to understand the defenses in which the Confederates believed they were fighting for. Business, politics, slavery and abolition, differences between Northerners and Southerners beliefs and values are all pieces to the puzzle that eventually led to the war.…

    • 1848 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Ordeal or Reconstruction
    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ordeal or Reconstruction

    Since after the war the country need much reconstruction within the country to be able to combine the south and north back together. Another issue would be dealing with the pros and cons of the reconstruction plan that Lincoln had faced with. There were many Political issues when it came to brining the south back into the Union; this brings issue because the democrats and republicans would then be back in the same congress. Many northerners wanted to see the South be punished because of their rebellious attitude during the civil war.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Differences Between The South And The North After The Civil War
    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Differences Between The South And The North After The Civil War

    “However, it had seemed that the dream of Reconstruction might be realized.” (W.E.B Dubois). This explains that people, both in the south and the north have seen all the bad issues that happened after the civil war. The civil war has caused a large separation between the south and north. From all the damage that happened between the two states of slavery getting involved and separation made Lincoln make a reconstruction to make the north and south one big state at the end.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Short And Long Term Effects Of The Civil War
    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Short And Long Term Effects Of The Civil War

    "I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality..” The civil war was a four year long battle between the Confederate States of America and the Union. The Union included the states of New York, Maine, California, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Nevada, and Oregon, lead by Abraham Lincoln. While the Confederate States were Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Tennessee, Mississippi, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina and Virginia lead by Jefferson Davis. In the clashing…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Confederate Monuments Argumentative Essay
    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Confederate Monuments Argumentative Essay

    People think it’s all about how the southern states wanted to fight for slavery, but little do those people know that it had no only been about that. That southern states wanted a say in what was going to happen in their states and wanted more control over it because the federal government was tell the states how they were going to run it and the south decided they wanted to stand up for their states. As reported by Amy M. Wrobel in American Confederate Pride, one of the head generals, Robert E. Lee, said, “There are few, I believe, in this enlightened age, who will not acknowledge that slavery is an institution of a moral and political evil" In 1858. In 1866 he also made a statement that "All the south ever desired was that the union, as established by our forefathers, be preserved; and that the Government, as originally organized, should be administered in purity and…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Three Most Significant Consequences Of The Civil War
    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Three Most Significant Consequences Of The Civil War

    The three most significant consequences of the Civil War were how to punish the south, what we were going to do with the slaves, and how we were going to reunite the United States. In my opinion, reuniting the country was the most important thing that we had to take care of. One problem that we were faced with was how the south was going to be punished. Abraham Lincoln did not think that this was a very big priority in repairing the U.S. after the war and neither do I (pg. 470).…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalism In The Civil War
    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page

    Federalism In The Civil War

    Some portion of the debate that prompted the Civil War (1861– 1865) concerned federalism. Numerous Southerners felt that state governments alone had the power to settle on important choices, for example, whether slavery ought to be legal. Advocates of states' rights supported the individual state governments had the ;supreme law' the central government in light of the fact that the states had created the federal government through the ratification of the Constitution. Most Southern states ended up seceding from the Union since they felt that withdrawal was the best way to secure their rights. Abraham Lincoln and numerous Northerners held that the Union together; their triumph confirmed the national government's right to have control over the…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War Was Inevitable
    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Civil War Was Inevitable

    In order for the North and South to move forward as one country, they had to settle their differences. Within six months of Lincoln’s election in 1860 as President of the United States, several states had seceded from the Union, and the American Civil War had begun. Lincoln was anti-slavery, and therefore, it seemed to the Southern slave owners that he was also anti-South. Lincoln believed that in order to save the union, they had to try to bring back the Confederate states, but the South believed they had the right to leave the Union and fight…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More