Preview

How and why did the apartheid system come into existence in South Africa and how was its existence maintained and enforced for so long?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1600 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How and why did the apartheid system come into existence in South Africa and how was its existence maintained and enforced for so long?
The term "apartheid" was one of the most politically charged words in the second half of the 20th century, and still remains notorious today. Apartheid translated from Afrikaans means "separateness" or "apartness". However when the National Party came to power in South Africa in 1948, it took on a much more sinister meaning and today is associated with racial and ethnic discrimination. The roots of apartheid stem deep into South African history. It started way back during European settlement, and was enforced and maintained right up until the end of the 20th Century. It will forever leave a mark on South Africa and indeed the world; a dark period in human history from which we have and will continue to learn.

Tensions between Europeans and native Africans have existed since the first days of settlement and the earliest signs of what would snowball to become apartheid can be traced to these times. In 1488, the Portuguese first sailed past the Cape of Good Hope, eventually landing there and trading for food with people who called themselves Khoikhoi. It wasn't until the 1600s though, when the Dutch East India Company set up a base in Southern Africa, that the roots for what is today known as South Africa were put down. Initially contacts between the Khoikhoi and the new Europeans were peaceful, but over time the situation grew hostile. Aided by their guns, as well as the diseases they brought with them, the Europeans took more and more land and disrupted the natives' lifestyle.

By 1795 15000 Europeans and their slaves were scattered throughout the Cape colony. Violence between the natives and the Europeans was inevitable. There had been fights between the groups in small battles, but it wasn't until the late 18th Century that there was a large scale frontier war between them. The natives were driven back, but in 1806 Britain took over the Dutch Cape Colony, bringing British settlers to the area. This wasn't a real problem to the Boers, the earliest European



References: 1 - Automating Apartheid - U.S. Computer exports to South Africa and the Arms Embargo. Omega Press, Philadelphia, 1982Bibliography:Books:Meisel,J. (1994) South Africa At The Crossroads. Cape Town; The Millbrook PressChristopher,A. (1994) The Atlas of Changing South Africa. London; RoutledgeTames,R. (2000) The End of Apartheid: a New South Africa. Oxford: Heinemann LibraryInternet Sites:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheid_in_South_Africahttp://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~cale/cs201/apartheid.hist.htmlhttp://www.africanaencyclopedia.com/apartheid/apartheid.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Historical information about the period of publication: * South Africa already colonized by Europeans * Rampant racism * Introduction of apartheid in 1948…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Their leader Shaka had planted all his ideas and teachings into the Zulu people and because of him, they had this fearless persona about them to. All they were known for was wreaking havoc and growing their already growing empires with trained a killer, which was going to be a problem. I resented the British Laws that was passed to abolish slavery. If they never passed these laws things would have never changed and this would have never stroked their already growing egos. These laws caused us Boers to revolt and try to escape British rule. This was one of the key opponents that lead us into battle with the Zulu people. These ignorant, blood-thirsty, man slaying, people are dangerous. They start countless wars and make a lot of enemies which would hurt them because they were creating countless enemies. The only thing that they know how to do is how to kill and to start war amongst themselves, when we were trying to compromise with them. We was only trying to teach these barbaric people some of our ways and to civilize them, trying to help the blacks of the South Africa. All the “Great” King of The Zulu Land had to do was disband his military and recognize Britain’s authority, or face invasion. As usual they chose what they knew how to do best, which was how to start war. The same British people that passed the slave abolishing law for these people they were now going into war with them. So not only did they have wars with Boers they also had war with the British now to, how ironic. Even though I despise these people they were very courageous. It’s almost funny how the Zulu’s thought they could defeat us with their sticks. They knew that they could not have stopped us with their assegai which was basically a spear, while we…

    • 619 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the years that followed the Berlin Conference (1884-1885) European nations divided and colonized Africa among themselves. This time period became to be known as the Scramble for Africa. It would be years until Africa freed itself of European domination. Yet in the time that the Scramble for Africa took place, European dominance was met with various reactions from the native people. Some natives unwillingly submitted, opposed to the idea of European domination, but left with no other choice. Other natives were willing to compromise, while the rest were preparing or already rebelling against the…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Even though they ended slavery African people were not treated fairly. Europeans started to explore and conquer more parts of Africa. This time they took ivory and other resources so that they could become rich. Then they decided that Africans needed to be more like them so they took over and forced their ways on the native Africans. Then a big meeting was held because too many European countries were fighting over Africa.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Europeans introduced Africa to guns, germs, and steels which transformed their society and dynamics. In the mid-1600s, Europeans were the first settlers of Africa and established their community by farming and herding cattle. The Europeans lived in proximity with their domesticated animals that carried diseases. Over time, the Europeans developed a resistance to the virus but the Cape and Koi- San tribe did not have immunity to the virus and developed smallpox. Around the 1830s, the European expanded north and encountered a complex society known as the Zulus. The Zulus was a highly developed society with military skills and 30,000 miles of land. The Europeans trespassed onto the Zulus land, and the Zulus attacked, and killed 300 people.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Europeans treated Africans unethically, and with extreme inferiority. When Europeans came to Africa, they were ruling indirectly, which…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism has positively affected South Africa by bringing up new crops, new technology, development of structures, improved transportation, and industrialization. Fearing they wouldn't get an opportunity to collect raw materials, the other Europeans hurried to establish their presence on the continent. During the 1870s, the Belgians began to trade with Africans in the Congo. Africans were traded and treated as slaves, the white folk were cruel and punished them.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cape Colony was originally owned by the Dutch and was an opulent trade port as the Suez Canal had not yet been made, so merchants would have to sail around the Cape of Africa. It would not be until when Napoleon Bonaparte conquered the Netherlands would the British claim the Cape Colony in fear of it being withheld from them. It was not until 1867 did the British have ulterior motives for the colony other than a trade port as diamonds were discovered, causing a boom in the mining industry, with gold being discovered 20 years later causing another boom. With the discovery of these resources, Britain had made it harder for Indigenous Africans to own land1, making it difficult for populations to sustain themselves with farming, much less any commercial activities, including mining which also led to a decrease of competition. The 1913 Natives’ Land Act also outlawed Indigenous Africans from sharecropping, encouraging the Indigenous Africans to work in mines.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The natives of Africa were against the invasion of European explorers, and tensions escalated when treaties were misinterpreted. Europeans sought sovereign control over natives, and the Africans believed the treaties were simply diplomatic and commercial friendships. Soon African rulers realized that they had been deceived. European powers were soon attempting to impose and exercise political control over the land. This was met by military resistance of Africans who resisted colonial…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Spanish soon found themselves in a war with the Zulu tribe. The Zulu was able to drive the Spanish back with a surprise attack. The second attack however, the Spanish would be ready. The Spanish circled their wagons and used the circle as a stronghold. The Spanish used their rifles to completely decimate the Zulu people and won the Battle of Blood River. The Zulus joined New Guineans and the Incas on the list of unlucky civilizations. The Europeans implemented railroads for transport across Africa. Around this time, the Europeans developed the world’s first automatic gun. The weapon was unstoppable and it overwhelmed and overcame any attackers. With the power the Europeans now possessed, they began to extract Africa’s wealth for their own profit. However, the Africans had germs on their side. The Africans traveled in small groups and in strategic areas to prevent disease. The Africans also had some immunity to the diseases present on Africa. The Europeans were placed in the same situation the Incas were in. Many of them died due to the disease. The Europeans also did not know how to farm on the more northern African land because the climate was so much different. The Africans had knowledge of tropical farming but the Europeans did not. Many of the European animals also died from disease. The Europeans’ thirst would not die as they continued to take advantage of Africa. The Belgians destroyed African villages and forced Africans to work in mines. The consequences of grouping the Africans in large towns were and continue to be catastrophic. Africans lived in small groups to prevent disease but the Belgians forced them to join together. This led to the rapid spread of disease and the destruction of the old African ways. In the present day Malaria robs Africa of both its people and its money. Africa’s disease riddled counties are a result of their geography. Their fate was also sealed long before guns, germs, and…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1740s the Dutch developed a trading post in Cape Colony, that was used for the production of fresh food for the incoming vessels, but it was soon swiped by the British. The British were supportive of the native peoples, the Zulus, and sought to remove the Dutch, or the Afrikaners, from its current position. Tensions increased between the Afrikaners and the British, and eventually turned to war. The war resulted in the gaining of Afrikaner or Boer rights and the unification of the Boers within the British Empire. When the Boer nation emerged, a seemingly permanant policy of racial domination took over South Africa; corrupting it. In the 1870s the Congo of Central Africa became King Leopold II's area of conquest; using its inhabitants as laborers in the production of ivory, rubber, and minerals. Combined with the pressures of the Belgian government under Leopold's demand, there was a continuos fray over the division of Africa into the Two Congos between King Leopold II and the French, causing two seperate effects in the same area.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Europe started to move closer inland of Africa, they started by making deals with the chiefs of native tribes. This started mostly with a journalists named H. M. Stanley. He explored Africa and made unfair treaties with leaders. He did this with support of the Belgian kind, King Leopold II. These treaties would often be something similar to, in exchange for a few yards of cloths and some trinkets, Belgium will be able to put their flag on the chiefs land and use the land as well as the people on it.5 Before Europe had come in and started to take over the land, the natives had known what resources they had and were very skilled in using them, and they lived largely off of trade with other regions and tribal communities. The had a livable system that was serving the community well. When Europeans took over, they saw many of the resources that were in Africa, such as diamonds and iron6 and knew the value of them on a bigger market and told the natives that there is much more worth in this land then they are getting out of it. The chiefs then let the Europeans trade the resources on a worldly scale, which, while it did give Africa a bigger, and more worldly economy, it quickly turned into a bourgeoisie/proletarian society with the African on…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Colonialism began in 1652 in South Africa, it was the slavery and forced labour model, this was the original model of colonisation brought by the Dutch. However the Africans were not just helpless victims, a lot of African rulers saw many benefits from maintaining contact with the Europeans and for a long time they engaged voluntarily with the Dutches on their own terms.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Similar to the segregation taking place in the United States in the 1960’s, that the famous activist, Martin Luther King Jr., along with other well-recognized activists, helped put an end to, apartheid, had the same ideals and principles that were around in the early years of the United States. Before learning what the exact meaning of the word apartheid meant, I had a basic idea of what it could mean because of the root word “apart”. Apartheid was the method in which South Africa’s government isolated the rich from the poor citizens, having them experience some of the worst times in South Africa. The rights of the black citizens of South Africa at that time were awfully violated. In fact, blacks had no rights because the government believed in white-supremacy. Before apartheid went to its extremes, it was originally created so that the National Party would have control over the economy that the country…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    academic attention. In Africa, South Africa appears to be more advanced in this regard, with Shoprite at…

    • 5250 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays