Andrei Popov And Maggie Jackson Summary

Although Andrei Popov and Maggie Jackson share a common dilemma of arguing if the Internet has had consequences in our fragmented critical thinking, both essays contain different analysis in the way they persuade the audience. For instance, Andrei Popov has compelled his own opinion with informal comments on the internet to show the lack of communication, he does not provide a reliable outside source that can help the reader to think critically. On the other hand, Maggie Jackson relies on evidence from expert testimony such as Professor Gloria Mark and statistics from The Associated Press. The language on this essay has subjectivity and hyperbole as a way to transmit the Jackson’s message through usage of pathos. For example, on paragraph five,