During the 1830’s and 1820’s the Jacksonain Democrats viewed them selves as the protectors of the Constitution from other parties who had a loose on the constitution. This statement can be viewed as both true and false as the Jacksonian Democrats did not live up to their promises. With the veto of the bank, Indian Removal Act, Jackson did little to defend the United States Constitution as promised. To add on to Jackson’s inconsistencies many of his decisions were found to have flaws that directly opposed to the Constitution. Andrew Jackson and his followers, although promised to be defenders of the Constitution, were some times anything but that.…
In 1829, Andrew Jackson was elected to be the 7th president. His promises were big, his changes were small such as equality democracy and true representation. This was not the lack of Jackson's ambition or drive, but the outcome of the many different challenges he faced. Now taking all this into consideration as I weigh out his pros and cons assessing Jackson's presidency. In my own opinion, his presidency was good nor bad, it was an even balance between keeping his promises, and dealing with presidential issues. His term is commonly know as the "Age of Jackson Democracy"; The irony in theses names is that it was simply those who supported Jackson meeting up together; it was not meant to be the start of forming presidential parties. In Mistakes…
Jacksonian Democracy was a movement for more democracy in the American government in the 1830s. This particular movement was led by President Andrew Jackson. Jackson had wanted more rights for the common man, and wanted to eliminate all aristocracy in the American nation. This democracy would be aided by the people of the recently established settlements in the South and West. The Jacksonian Democrats had referred to themselves as to be guardians of the Constitution, by giving economic opportunities and more political democracy as well as individual liberty. Before his presidency, the Era of Good Feelings had just come to an end after the Panic of 1819. When Jackson had taken office in 1828, he knew this was going to be a difficult transition for him as well as the American people.…
Furthermore, politically, Jackson put in place the spoils system where he took out many people voted into government office in favor of those who supported his own partisan views. This in itself was a very corrupt decision that eliminated many people from the government that were put into office by way of democracy and instead, Jackson put in place people based on party loyalty who were not necessarily qualified for their job in place of competence and likability by the…
Andrew Jackson is an Autocrat because even though he said he was a Democrat, he barely showed that in his actions. The only Democratic thing he did was give more power to the lower farmers, but after that, Jackson became a tyrant. He kept the bank money for himself (Doc. National Bank Controversy 1, 2, and 3) and drove indians out of there land, even though they had the right from previous documents to stay (Doc. Indian Removal 1, 2, and 3). The crueler part about the Indian Removal was that his adopted son was a Creek Indian and Jackson killed the Creek Indian kind by removing them from their homes (Doc. Indian Removal 3). He did not follow the documents in the past (Doc. Indian Removal 1) stating that certain Indians could stay in their land,…
Andrew Jackson was a one man show unless it came to putting on a fake smile to “win” over his followers support. If something that he saw posed as a threat to his ideas then it was no good. Take cooperation’s or businesses for example, Andrew Jackson and most of his Democratic followers feared the growing economic and political power exercised by some corporations. Their ability to amass wealth, through banking and manufacturing operations, and to influence and even coerce individual citizens, posed a threat to the Jeffersonian ideals that Jackson held dear. So once again, those companies threatened his power and he did not like that.…
During the difficulties of the Era of Jacksonian Democracy, Andrew Jackson either face frequent adversities with caution; for instance the Indian Removal Act and the elimination of the National Bank; or Andrew Jackson acted with good intent, such as in the Nullification Crisis and the Peggy Eaton…
It is agreeable that the Jacksonian Democrats perceived themselves as strict guardians of the United States Constitution. It is not agreeable with how they went about preserving the political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity they stood for. While trying to create this balance, Jackson used tactics favorable only to his opinion. Jackson's main idea was to rid of aristocracy, giving the power to the poorer classes, standing against rich white men. The flaw in their scheme was that the people who came up with this idea were all rich white men.…
President Jackson did a fantastic job of expanding democracy. In his presidency he expanded the amount of voters from 27% in the election of 1824 to 58% in 1828 and by 1840 80% of adult white males were voting. Jackson thoroughly believed in “equal protection and equal benefits”, and that…
One of the disparities in the views and actions of the Jacksonian Democrats involved social equality. Jackson repeatedly held sectionalist views and did things that were better for the average, poor community than for the country as a whole. One such example of this is shown in Documents B and C involving the National Bank. In his National Bank veto message in Document B, Jackson says, "It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes." Jackson singles out the wealthier class and accuses them of being selfish. Because this ridiculous comment has no intelligent purpose other than to create an enormous, nationwide class clash, it must be seen as evidence that Jackson was a sectionalist. Daniel Webster responded to this message in Document C by stating, "It manifestly seeks to inflame the poor against the rich … for the purpose of turning against them [the other class] the prejudices and the resentments of the other classes." Daniel Webster is saying what was previously mentioned. It was as though Jackson was trying to anger the poor to turn against the rich. Jackson's actions show that his primary goal was not to help the country, but to address his own personal issues. This completely contrasts the Jacksonian Democrats view of themselves. The Jacksonians thought that they were acting in the best interest of the country, where they were truly thinking about their own needs.…
Although Jackson used undemocratic actions to pursue his objectives, he was democratic in that he did it for the welfare of the people.…
Jackson's Presidency was the beginning of the modern presidency, one in which the powers that the president holds while in the office of the grew immensely. Jackson was the first President to introduce the spoils system, the system in which when a political party wins an election the party members are given government jobs to as a reward for working toward victory, and as an incentive to keep working for the party. From this, patronage - present on a state level, became more powerful on a national…
Andrew Jackson’s presidency regularly corresponds with Democracy like John F. Kennedy corresponds with the Cuban Missile Crisis and how Abraham Lincoln corresponds with the Civil War. The 1800s began a new era of the “common man”. Jackson aided in this era with his presidency. For example, before Jackson was president, voting was limited only to people who owned property; then when Jackson became president, voting was open to all white males. Jackson’s actions during his rule shifted the direction of America to a more democratic state.…
Andrew Jackson became the president of the United States in 1828 and was the country’s leading democrat. Democracy during this time had not yet embraced all Americans, excluding women, African Americans, and Indians (Keene, 226). Jackson and his supporters desired to limit the rights of blacks by basically stripping them of their suffrage. Many states expanded suffrage for white men by removing property requirements, while others were imposing new constrictions on blacks, such as high property requirements, therefore stripping them of their right to vote. This racial exclusion limited African American votes throughout the North and West in states such as Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, and most all states that entered the Union after 1819 (Keene, 241). Many states such as Indiana, Illinois, and Ohio regulated the conduct of free blacks by requiring those who emigrated in the state to post a bond (much like a prisoner) or be deported, or by prohibiting them from testifying in court or bringing civil suits (Keene,241). Jackson’s contact with Indians, while including them into his vision of white man’s democracy, proved to have extreme consequences as well. Jackson’s vision was to expand the lands of the white settlers’ and it proved to have no room for the respect of Indians’ rights. Jackson and his supporters desired to constrict Indian’s rights, and to take away their lands for the purpose of westward expansion. Although president Jackson treated the natives as inferior subjects to white men as himself, the Cherokees, one of the “Five Civilized Tribes,” chose to obey his wishes and assimilate, rather than to resist. A conflict arose between the Cherokees and the state of Georgia, their white neighbors, over whether the Cherokees could declare themselves an independent nation or not. However,…
Andrew Jackson wasn’t just an ordinary president. People had different perspectives over Andrew Jackson. He determined to rescue the will for politics(people). He increased numbers of offices directly elected by the people and restore economic system that protected rights and small producers rather than corporations and the wealthy. He also ignored three decades of government precedent, and a clear court ruling, while implementing a removal policy that displaced over 90,000 people. Was Andrew Jackson a democratic supporter of the people or a tyrant? Did he support democracy or his principles. Or did Andrew Jackson vetoed more bills to become a “a man of people?” Andrew Jackson is a tyrant because he supported the unfair laws, forced indians off their land, and ignored the supreme ruling,refusing of signing laws by the people's representatives law that would improve the country.…