Preview

Andrew Sullivan's For Gay Marriage

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
214 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Andrew Sullivan's For Gay Marriage
In the article ”For Gay Marriage,” author Andrew Sullivan argues for homosexuals to have equal rights as heterosexuals and that turning down these rights from them is taking away from their equality. Sullivan begins explaining his point on gay marriage by arguing with the definition of marriage. He explains that marriage simply just a strong, compelling bond between two individuals. He then continues the article by providing examples of
Throughout the article, Sullivan put statistics and facts to try and strengthen his claim, He first states, “There is no evidence that shows any deleterious impact on a child brought up by two homosexual parents…” (32). Later on he says, “If nothing else were done at all, and gay marriage were legalized, 90


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sullivan would view “same-sex marriage” the same as he would view “gay marriage.” The two terms are interchangeable and are descriptive by identifying the marriage as a homosexual one. Any label before the word “marriage” would be considered a euphemism by Sullivan; he would prefer marriage to be a stand-alone statement without distinction, a statement that says to society, “I am capable of love, of community, of being part of a family, and I deserve to be united with the person I love in…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citing a recent court ruling that allowed a gay individual to stay in his partner’s rent controlled apartment after his partner passed away, thus qualifying the individual as a member of the deceased partner’s family, Sullivan uses many sagacious points that most readers can relate to. His choice of words and examples make it seem that he is passionate about this issue and the preservation of the family unit in general. Sullivan makes a prudent argument as to what could be gained by encouraging loving, committed relationships. Legalizing gay marriage would promote social acceptance, the same economic advantages and relationship security between two people who love one another. This would also encourage a deeper commitment that is harder to get out of. Also pointed out is that legalizing gay marriage would not jeopardize the legitimacy of traditional, straight marriage. Allowing the same rights to fellow individuals could only help to promote that which we all hold dear, family…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bennett makes many over generalizations about the impact the signals of legalizing gay marriage would send to teens. Bennett almost contradicts himself with the inclusion of the quote from Harvard professor E.L. Patullo, "a very substantial number of people are born with the potential to live either straight or gay lives" (410). Many people are born with the potential to lead gay or straight lives, it is a choice, and the legalization of gay marriage would not cause societal indifference, but would rather foster a welcoming environment for young gays to come out into rather than living in fear or shame because of the hate and repercussions of being homosexual. Bennett also over generalizes the findings of an article about teenagers and adults being interviewed about being gay and bisexual. Fifty kids and dozens of parents and counselors does not speak for the whole population of a country, but also shows the weakness of Bennett 's argument as it shows the lack of actual education there is in much of the country on the subject of homosexuality. Bennett also makes assumptions about how conservative parents will lose the right to teach their kids…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In "Why the M Word Matters to Me" (Time Magazine, 02/08/04), Andrew Sullivan describes the troubles in his life that he encountered as a gay man. At first, he grew up in a traditional and conservative home. As he grew order, he realized something different between him and his peers did for girls. But no one explained it to him. Gradually, he became isolated and he felt that he would never be a part of his family. A few years later, he realized that he was gay, and his friends had found out that. However, when people talk about gay marriage, they miss the point. Andrew thinks people have gone into the wrong direction. He appeals gay people should not need to feel isolation. On the contrary, they should entitle equal right and get marriage.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lobbying Plan

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarily in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the article “For Gay Marriage” Andrew Sullivan argues that marriage should be available to any two citizens, which includes homosexuals. He defines marriage as “an emotion, financial, and psychological bond” between two individuals. Even thou most people define marriage between man and woman, he says it’s okay if the marriage couples are both man or woman as long as they have the “emotion, financial, and psychological bond”.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriages: Make Them Legal is an article written by Thomas B. Stoddard, an executive director of a gay rights organization called the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund. In the aforementioned article, he painfully illustrates the injustices and imbalance of the typical “traditional marriage” and its impact on average, devoted homosexual couples. More than just state his opinion on marriage between homosexuals, he emphasizes the injustice by accentuating real world situations. Not only does Stoddard denote the negative effects on loving gay couples, he illuminates the idea of gay marriage as something beneficial not only to gay partners, but society as a whole (722).…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He asserts, one may say correctly if he already shares Sullivan 's opinion, that children raised by homosexual partners are as well adjusted as children raised by traditional, heterosexual parents. This would be a perfect opportunity for Sullivan to cite several well-conducted, long-term studies which bear out his view. But does he take the opportunity? Does he cite any studies? No, not one.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    WGU GLT1

    • 878 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When asked if one believes in equal rights for all citizens, the typical, rote response is a resounding “Yes”. If the question becomes more specific as to include the right for homosexuals to marry, a hesitation follows. The concept of gay marriage is far deeper a societal problem for most because its roots lie in prejudicial perspectives that have permeated us for years. Before the fight for the right to marry, the gay community has long endured simply the right to exist openly without feeling pariah-like.…

    • 878 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doma Unconstitutional

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Synopsis: The article is written by former US President Bill Clinton who in 1996 signed the Defense of Marriage Act which stated that marriage is defined as being between Man and Woman. What this means for gay couples is that they cannot enjoy the benefits that heterosexual couples have such as the ability to file taxes jointly, equal family benefits when it comes to pensions and health care and other federal statuses (Clinton 2013). While same-sex marriage is legal is several states it is not recognized by the Federal Government due to the DOMA. Bill Clinton who originally signed it states that he no longer supports it and says that “DOMA and opposition to marriage equality are vestiges of just such an unfamiliar society” (Clinton 2013). While he was signing DOMA he made sure to make the statement that it should not be taken as an act of discrimination and now 17 years later in 2013 he admits that the law itself is discriminatory and that it should be overturned in court.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sullivan argues that gay parents are no different than heterosexual parents or single parents. The child would still have a safe and loving environment, “there is no evidence that shows any deleterious impact on a child brought up by two homosexual parents” (Sullivan 1135). Gay parents have been around and there hasn't been an issue. Sullivan believes that once gay marriage is legalized, gay parents would help “reinforce a healthy trend” (1135). While Bennett opposes the idea of gay parents raising children. He believes it disrupts the balance, “it is far better far better for a child stop be raised by a mother and a father than by, say, two homosexual males” (Bennett 1140). He wants to keep the tradition alive.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Critical Thinking

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Those who argue against gay marriage insist that the only legitimate marriages are those between men and women. Gay marriage furthermore represents a threat to established norms of authority, identity and power. Those who possess that authority and power and who have used them to create their identities are thereby threatened by the prospective changes. Marriage is not just an institution, but also a symbol representing our culture 's ideals about sex, sexuality, and human relationships. Symbols are important they are a common cultural currency, which we each use to help create our sense of self.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States of America, through its core democratic values, is greatly divided on civil rights issues because of the weight of consideration given to all who can voice their opinions. This gives rise to many topics of strong debate, delaying progressive action due to liberties granted by the Bill of Rights, and implications of impeding civil rights discrepancies. Currently there is a major debate in the white house, concerning the legal rights of gay people, mainly their right to have a marital status recognized by all levels of government. In 1996, there was an act, Defence of Marriage Act (DOMA), that was approved that made clear what the definition was of the words “marriage” and “spouse”. This definition was: “In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ‘marriage’ means only a…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shapiro, J.P. (September 16, 1996) Kids with gay parents: as lawmakers battle gay marriages, a look at how the children fare (pp 75-79) U.S: U.S. News & World Report…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays