Anger Follows An Accusation Of Voter Fraud By Michael Wine Article Analysis

Michael Wine’s article, “Anger Follows an Accusation of Voter Fraud” was published less than a week ago in the New York Times. In this article, Wine summarizes the Trump Voter Fraud Panel and the recent controversies since it was created in May. Wines does a great job of specifically focusing in on the main point of the article right when he begins writing. The main idea is that the fraud panel is causing controversies when prying into vote fraud situations. For instance, the commission’s leader suggested that the November election of Senator Maggie Hassan, Democrat in New Hampshire, was rigged. The article continues to develop as Wines introduces the New Hampshire secretary of state, William M. Gardner. Also a fellow democrat, Mr. Gardner was demanded to resign by the State’s entire congressional delegation. Wines paints a clear picture and writes detailed reasons as to why he was asked to resign. It seems that Wines main purpose for this article is to inform the reader of details and controversies going on inside the voting fraud situations, as there is more than meets the naked eye.
A thought has now been formed in the reader’s mind that the only way that the panel is able to get down to the bottom of the fraudulent elections is by becoming invasive in the American people’s private information. Wine even goes as far as including that a group called Common Cause did a report that ended in the discovery that “5,000 Colorado voters de-registered so that their personal information would not get sent to Washington” (Wine A16). Furthermore, Mr. Gardner states that these accusations have tarnished the commissions image before the fraud panel even started their