New scientific research has cast grave doubt on the safety testing of hundreds of thousands of consumer products. Everyday products, from soft drinks to paints, contain numerous synthetic chemicals. Official assurances of the safety of these chemicals are based largely on animal experiments. But recent results from a consortium in America suggested such assurances may be worthless.
The results challenge the longstanding scientific presumption holding that animal experiments are of direct relevance to humans. The research revealed that drugs developed using mice have had a 100% failure rate in almost 150 clinical trials on humans. This is not unusual considering the fact that “about 90% of all pharmaceuticals tested for safety in animals fail to reach the market”. The failure rates should not be a surprise. Over many years, in fact, genetic concordance has been questioned by a number of researchers, some of who have noted that mice were separated from humans by 120 million years of evolutionary change. Therefore its conclusion suggested researchers should expect that mouse, and probably other animal testing, is of little use in advancing the treatment of human illnesses. In other words, the public is probably being badly served by much of the money spent on medical research and the public is also likely being exposed to dangerous or ineffective pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, animal testing nearly prevented the approval of valuable drugs such as penicillin and subsequent antibiotics, but it did not prevent the thalidomide disaster of the 50s and 60s.
If animals are not useful predictors of important disease responses in humans it is unlikely they are useful as test subjects for the safety of human beings. That is to say, lack of genetic concordance means, quote unquote, the synthetic chemicals that are found in industrial products, incorporated into food, and otherwise spread throughout the environment, are essentially untested. Thus, all things considered, it is obviously not acceptable to experiment on non-human animals to develop products and medicines that benefit human beings.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Scientists are constantly looking for new medical advances that they hope will save people’s lives and often turn to animals as the optimal resource for testing new ideas and products. These animals range from rats and mice to dogs and monkeys. On top of varying animals, the tests they run fluctuate from simply checking the effectiveness of a medicine already in use to testing an entirely new form of treatment. However, there have beens years of controversy over the morality of using animals as the test subjects.…
- 1042 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The potential danger of using animals as subjects in drug and product testing is exemplified by the number of approved drugs and products that are later withdrawn. In Health and Humans Research, the AAVS reports that “51.5 percent of 198 drugs approved by the FDA between 1976 and 1985 caused severe adverse reactions after they were marketed” (10). The animal testing performed on these drugs gave no indication in animals that there would be adverse reactions in…
- 466 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…
- 300 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
As a result of this, nine out of every ten trial medicines that look safe and appear to be effective on animals, fail when they are given to humans. Because animals don’t react the same way as humans, not only do the failed tests delay medical progress, but also they are a waste of animal’s lives, and a waste of money that is spent into the research and tests. Animals have different anatomic, cellular, and metabolic structures than humans have. If a new product is passed just because it is safe on animals and isn’t on humans, that could be a very dangerous situation. One instance when this occurred was in 1950 when a sleeping pill worked on animals but when given to humans it caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe birth defects. Another time, a drug for arthritis was safe on mice but when administered to humans caused 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths. Animal testing can make researchers oversea potential cures and treatments. Some substances that are harmful to animals, are helpful to humans. For example, aspirin is dangerous to some animals. Arthur Allen says, “A source of human suffering may be the dozens of promising drugs that get shelved when they cause problems in animals that may not be relevant for humans.” (“Of Mice or Men: The Problems with Animal Testing”). Of all the medicines that pass animal trials and are ready for human…
- 871 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
For instance more than 90 percent of drugs and products that are approved fail when consumed by humans (Casey). This is because experiments done on animals have no relevance to human life at all. New technology like In Vitro has recently surfaced that could make the use of animals no more.…
- 681 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Animal testing is rarely successful since animals have different physiologies than humans. There has been many studies that have shown inaccuracy and unsuccess in animal testing. Studies show, “90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in clinical trials” (Stop Animal Testing) and also, “Animal-tested drugs have killed, disabled or harmed millions of people and lead to costly delays as well” (Stop Animal Testing). It is evident that animal testing lacks accuracy and has dangerous consequences, therefore it should no longer be…
- 620 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
When it comes to the topic of animal testing, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether it helps researchers to find new drugs and treatments suitable for humans. Whereas some are convinced that it does help researchers find new drugs and treatments, others maintain that some drugs tested on animals may never actually be useful or even safe for human consumption. In my own view the results of animals testing are unreliable because animals and humans are not genetically or anatomically alike to one another.…
- 566 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
‘’a drug to fight Ebola had showed remarkable success when tested in rhesus monkeys.” (Trull,2015) “More recently, animal research has helped pave the way toward restoring vision.” (Trull,2015.) “ Thanks to the work of scientists and physicians at Duke University, an experimental new treatment for glioblastoma multiforme, or GBM--an aggressive tumor that kills about 12,000 people in the U.S. each year--is saving the lives of patients who, just months ago, had little hope of survival. This extraordinary development wouldn't have been possible without animal research.” (Trull, 2015) However, about 90% of approved animal tested products don’t make it out of the lab, for they don’t work on humans. A lot of testing on animals is unsuccessful, and most of the time when it is, it doesn’t work on humans. This evidence shows that animals are different than humans and testing on them won’t help…
- 728 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Animal Experimentation plays an important role in today’s medical and pharmaceutical advances, but many question the morality of such a use of animal life. Whether you argue that testing different products and drugs on animals is necessary or not, this has become an integral part of developing products. From that Tylenol you pop to get rid of your headache, to that perfect shade of pink lip gloss, animal testing is used in order to produce the simplest household items. Today, in the United States, it is federal law that requires all pharmaceuticals, food additives, cosmetics, and garden chemicals to undergo a series of tests, including animal testing, before being available to general public. It is estimated between fifty and a hundred million vertebrate animals worldwide are being used fro animal experiments. While many believe that animal experimentation is a crucial part of research and safety, others argue the morality of this issue. Another point of view some share is a mixture of both opposing views, where one believes that animal experimentation should only be condoned in the field of medical research but not for vanity reasons.…
- 688 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Regulatory agencies across the globe make it mandatory for companies to get their 'products' tested for toxicity before making them available in the market. These 'products', which range from prescription drugs to cosmetics, are tested on animals to check for the degree of skin irritation, skin penetration, eye irritation, carcinogenicity, etc. On the basis of these tests, it is determined whether the said product is fit for human use or not.…
- 986 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Though many breakthroughs have been made as a result of animal experimentation, many of the drugs that have been approved after animal testing had to be subsequently withdrawn because of harmful side effects. In fact, most experiments done on animals that are nothing like human beings, such as rats and mice. This undermines the dispute that these experiments are a reliable guide to human reactions. Scientifically, as well as morally, most animal experimentation is to be rejected as the reaction of a mouse to a substance is no guide to human reactions. Each species has its own unique…
- 829 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
(Alix Fano director of the Campaign for Responsible Transplantation and the author of Lethal Laws: Animal Testing, Human Health and Environmental Policy.) These findings conclude that Mice and Rats are not dependable subjects used for medical research. There are also alternatives for the unnecessary way of experimenting. Specifically, speaking of vitro testing. Vitro Testing is a way of conducting an experiment through a tube. This particular method for medical research has been beneficial to finding many cures for life threatening diseases. As a matter of fact, the cures today for AIDS disease were all discovered through vitro testing. According to the success of tube testing, animal experimentation is not essential to the medical research world. Not only does Vitro Testing open up a pathway of cures to diseases, it also save the many lives of innocent and loveable animals. Never again, will animal testing need to be a first priority in the name of science.(C. Ray Greek and Jean Swingle Greek are cofounders of Americans for Medical Advancement)To wrap up the importance of not justifying the use of animals for the world of medical research, previous experiments with Mice and Rats have failed to show a link between cancer and smoking. This failure was one of many occurring with use of animals as experimental subjects. (C. Ray Greek and Jean Swingle Greek are cofounders of Americans for Medical Advancement,) With great understanding of experimental failures, Alternatives, and the different doses of substances, animal testing the most unreliable and non essential method there is to medical…
- 1108 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In today’s society, many people debate whether or not using animals in research is humane. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. [2] Proponents of animal testing state that it has enabled the development of numerous life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, while opponents state that animal testing is cruel and often yields irrelevant results because animals are so different from human beings. Many different animals are used in scientific studies such as rabbits, mice, primates, dogs, cats, pigs, and cows. I believe that animal testing is beneficial because it provides opportunities to improve the lives of both humans and animals.…
- 587 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Can animals feel pain, suffer from depression, or even contemplate suicide? The rising number of animal rights protests has caused scientists to ask themselves these questions. While discovering new medications is important for the public health, the welfare of animals has been brought to experts’ attention. For example, in “The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation,” neurologist and public health specialist Aysha Akhtar wants every aspect of drug testing using animals to end due to the lack of recent advancements and the increasing harm that animals experience. She shows that the genetic relationship between humans and animals form unreliable experimentation can cause harm to humans. However, there are…
- 1192 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
100 million animals are used in animal testing every single year to further the understanding of species and the impact of different modern medicines. There are many organizations that are extremely against the use of these animals in medicine, saying that it is “cruel and inhumane”. Compare these 100 million to the 56 billion animals slaughtered for food for humans. Those 100 million almost seem like a small amount, don’t they? The animals used in scientific testing have contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. In “Animal Testing and Its Gift to Humans”, published in The Wall Street Journal, author and opinion journalist, Frankie L. Trull, analyzes the medical miracles and breakthroughs due to animal testing, including the treatments…
- 1080 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays