Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Animal Farm

Good Essays
616 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Farm
Describe a key relationship between two or more characters or individuals in the written text. Explain how the relationship helped you to understand these characters.

In the novel Animal Farm written by George Orwell a key relationship between two characters was Squealer and Napoleons relationship. This relationship helped me understand that they were both dishonest and manipulative: they would both often change the truth and manipulate other animals to what suits them at the animals expense.

The first reason I think the relationship between Napoleon and Squealer helped me understand their characters was when they made Snowball look like a big traitor. After Napoleon got rid of Snowball Squealer tells the other animals that he was ‘no better than a criminal’. When the windmill got ruined because of a violent windy storm Napoleon says ‘Snowball has done this thing’. This taught me that they would not mind twisting the truth to what suits then as these were clearly lies designed to make Napoleon and Squealer look better by comparison. Orwell uses persuasive language here for example when Boxer questioned that Snowball was wounded and running with blood Squealer says “That was part of the arrangement! Jones’s shot only grazed him. I could show you this in his own writing, if you were able to read it’ and when boxer says he does not believe that Snowball was a traitor at the beginning Squealer says ‘Our leader comrade Napoleon, has stated categorically – categorically, comrade – that Snowball was Jones’s agents from the very beginning – yes, and from long before the rebellion was ever thought of.’ Orwell uses this to show that even when something is far from the truth people in power can make you believe it is true.
The second reason I think the relationship between Squealer and Napoleon helped me understand their characters was because they also change the Seven Commandments. For example they change the motto ‘No animal shall kill any other animal’ to ‘No animal shall kill any other animal without cause’ and ‘No animal shall sleep in a bed’ becomes ‘No animal shall sleep in a bed with sheets’ and to explain those facts they blame the 'faulty' memory of the other animals. Orwells purpose here was to show that people often use power to change their own commands to their own comfort and to what suits them.
Another way the relationship between Squealer and Napoleon helped me understand their characters is when they decide they want to move into the farmhouse. They have to keep themselves comfortable so that they can do the great work they do. They have to eat apples and drink the milk because otherwise they would lose their strength and not be able to complete the tasks they've chosen for themselves. They also act like they "don't even want to take the apples" but they must as they consider the demands placed on them. This was shown when Squealer was sent to make the explanations to the other animals ‘Comrades!’ he cried “You do not imagine, I hope, that we pigs are doing this in the spirit of selfishness and privilege? Many of us actually dislike milk and apples. I dislike them myself. Our sole object in taking these things is to preserve our health. “ “It is for your sake we drink that milk and eat those apples.” This shows that people in control often act in a caring and concerned way to show thAt they are not doing something for their own good but are doing it for the benefit of others.

Those are the reasons that the key relationship between Squealer and Napoleon helped me understand their self-centered, dishonest and manipulative characters.

Maryam 11VZW

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Napoleon ordered Squealer to provide the animals with untrue propaganda, causing Squealer to have his personality completely twisted. Squealer forced…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Okay. In the book The Animal Farm Squealer, the pig, shows some extremely complex characteristics. His ability to persuade the animals to do or believe anything is incredible. Squealer got even the animals to believe that Napoleon was a good leader, which we all know is not true, for multiple years. I believe Orwell created Squealer to get us to understand how manipulated the people of Russia were, in these times. Orwell writes “…Squealer would talk with tears rolling down his cheeks… “, showing squealer has knowledge of literary devices and how to use them (Orwell100). Obviously Squealer is cunning and full of himself knowing that he is smarter than the other animals.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arguably, another similarity and difference portraying Napoleon and Snowball are the relationships they built and ignored with their fellow animals and their views on life and leadership. Throughout the novel, Napoleon has only formed relationships with a finger full of people; including Squealer, his army of mine puppies, and the other pigs. Squealer was Napoleon's second in command, always reported back to him for any problems and praised Napoleon's work to the other animals by manipulating and giving excuses to why Napoleon is doing the certain things that are happening. This quote shoes the lies Squealer tells to cover his comrade and make him look innocent. Ever since Napoleon had stole Jessie's puppies, he used them to become his bodyguards…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He tries to use logic when saying that the animals in charge that are doing none of the work, but all the thinking for the farm, need more food than those working hard and starving. The reasoning is not really a good reason for what Napoleon and him are wanting to do, but the animals on the farm don't know any better, they aren't educated. So, in the end, all the animals always believe what ever Napoleon has to say, or Squealer in that matter. They believe them because everything they are saying seem to make sense to them, when in reality, none of it would actually make sense to an educated person. He also uses pathos in also all…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Such oversimplification is pronounce with Squealers invention of “four legs bad, two legs better!” Though unoriginal, being derived from Snowball’s “four legs good, two legs bad,” Squealer immediately limits the terms of debates when he teaches the sheep to bleat this radically simplified slogan. In addition, Squealer’s constant mention of the equality among animals in Napoleon’s regime, is another form of oversimplification utilized by Squealer. Before the last chapter, the first and foremost commandment, “All animals are equal” is prevalent throughout, with every other being altered or eliminated in some form or manner by Squealer. His reduction of Animalism into this one commandment, certainly makes Squealer and ideal propagandist for any regime. This is because, such statements can be interpreted in relative terms (such as different gradations of equal-ness; some more having slightly more power than others) rather than an absolute one. Of course, this was the intended purpose, and only the reader, with the exception of Benjamin, can read between the lines to uncover Squealer’s subtle yet dramatic change over the philosophies of Animalism. Though this commandment is soon altered to, “all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others,” Squealer, yet again, vaguely captures the fundamentals of “Animalism.” Only the privileged few (the pigs) are able to…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Joseph Stalin was a major dictator in influencing communism in Russia. He used his power and status to rule over the people and scare them into doing what he says. In the novel, Animal Farm, by George Orwell, the character Napoleon is the equivalent to Stalin in this story when Napoleon rules and dictates over the other inferior animals. While dictating over the animals, Napoleon uses his bodyguards, or his dogs to scare the other animals into obeying his every command. Not only that, Napoleon uses Squealer as his mouthpiece to persuade the animals that all the hard labor being done is for the good of all the animals. And above all, without the animal’s stupidity and idiocy, Napoleon…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the novella, Animal Farm, Squealer persuades the animals to do what Napoleon tells them using pathos in all of his speeches. Squealer being Napoleons assistant in a sense, abuses language to justify Napoleon’s actions and policies to the masses by whatever means seem necessary. But Squealer must manipulate the animal’s emotions to convince them. Throughout the story Squealer uses, fear, guilt, and hatred to persuade the animals.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of many reasons Napoleon and Squealer get away with these false allegations is that the animals are too dumb to remember what happened.<br><br>Another way Napoleon uses methods to make him look good is simply changing the rules to favor himself. Squealer again is responsible for the wrongdoing. All of the Seven Commandments of Animal Farm are eventually broken before the commandments are "revised" to prove the pigs did nothing wrong. In the eighth chapter, the commandment that strictly forbids animals to kill one another was cunningly changed to "No animal shall kill any other animal without cause" after a series of executions of supposed traitors and probable Snowball followers. Napoleon forced confessions and eliminated these probable traitors under the newly revised rule. The new rule favored his popularity, respect, and increased his hunger for power.<br><br>Napoleon's actions were not unnoticed though. Those who noticed were intimidated by his guard dogs and were silenced. In one situation, young pigs protested Napoleon's…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon uses Squealer to spread his propaganda. Squealer, being very mellifluous and silver-tongued, can easily get the animals to believe and follow Napoleon's unorthodox laws and wishes. They don't realize how unfortunate their fate becomes by doing this.…

    • 625 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon's Integrity

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Often through his influential representative, Squealer, Napoleon routinely lies to the unintelligent animals. For instance, he alters the story of the Battle of the Cowshed to paint himself as a heroic figure. In actuality Napoleon accomplishes nothing remarkable during the battle, but Squealer later convinces the other animals otherwise: “Do you not remember… [how] when panic was spreading and all seemed lost, that Comrade Napoleon sprang forward with a cry of ‘Death to Humanity!’ and sank his teeth in Jones’s leg?” (81). Although Napoleon commands his followers’ admiration, he does not deserve that respect, for he obtains it deceitfully. He also conceals his own shortcomings by persuading the other animals to blame Snowball, whom he banished from Animal Farm, for all of the farm’s misfortunes. “Whenever anything went wrong it became usual to attribute it to Snowball” (78). By slandering Snowball, Napoleon deviously establishes himself among the other animals as the only fitting leader for Animal Farm. Admittedly, one instance of Napoleon’s trickery averts an attack on the farm when food supplies run low. “Napoleon was well aware of the bad results that might follow if the real facts of the food situation were known, and he decided to make use of Mr. Whymper to spread a contrary impression” (75). Though misleading the neighboring farmers proves advantageous in that instance, Napoleon’s…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every tyrant has his sycophant, and Napoleon has one in Squealer, a clever, and persuasive pig. Throughout the novel, he serves as Napoleon's mouthpiece and minister of propaganda. Every time an act of Napoleon's is questioned by the other animals regardless of how selfish or severe it may seem Squealer is able to convince the animals that Napoleon is only acting in their best interests and that Napoleon himself has made great sacrifices for Animal Farm. For example, after Squealer is questioned about Napoleon's stealing the milk and windfallen apples, he explains that Napoleon and his fellow pigs must take the milk and apples because they "contain substances absolutely necessary to the well-being of a pig." He further explains that many pigs "actually dislike milk and apples" and tells the animals, "It is for your sake that we drink that milk and eat those apples." While whisking his tail during such explanations his words are never direct and always skirt the obvious truth of the matter at…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The novel Animal Farm, by George Orwell, is an allegory portraying the dangers of a totalitarian government. It seeks to show how a society where all live completely equal has not been, and cannot be achieved. Orwell, through the use of the character Squealer, shows how propaganda can affect members of a communist society in a negative way. By drawing parallels to events in communist Russia, Orwell's Animal Farm illustrates how propaganda was used to control the Soviet people by deceiving them, threatening them and keeping them ignorant in an attempt to maintain order. The story uses simple language to explain and expose the corruption of communist Russia.<br><br>Throughout the story, Orwell uses Squealer to illustrate how propaganda persuaded and victimized Russian citizens. Squealer is a sly, crafty pig who is not only intelligent, but a manipulative speaker as well. His cunning is key to the deception of the other animals. In chapter three, Squealer deceives the animals of the farm for the first time. The animals find out that the milk and apples are given solely to the pigs, and Squealer is sent to explain the uneven distribution of farm resources. "'Comrades' he cried. 'You do not imagine, I hope, that we pigs are doing this in a spirit of selfishness and privilege?'" (Orwell 42) He goes on to explain, " 'Milk and apples (this has been proved by science, comrades) contain substances absolutely necessary to the well-being of a pig. We pigs are brainworkers (42). Here, Squealer tries to convince the animals that it's for health reasons that they take the apples and milk, but he tries to persuade them in other ways as well. Squealer continues, " 'The whole management and organization of this farm depend on us.... It is for your sake that we drink that milk and eat those apples'"(42). Finally, he convinces them with fear. " 'Do you know what would happen if we pigs failed in our duty? Jones would come back! Yes, Jones would come back!'" (42) Here, Squealer…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Farm

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    English political language has become deceptive, unclear and uncreative enabled by writers and speakers who use confusing words to appeal to their audiences. In his essay “Politics and the English Language,” George Orwell states “The English Language is in a bad way”; He uses “Animal Farm” to show practical examples of his claim through the Pigs’ use of dying metaphors, pretentious diction and meaningless words.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Farm

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    III. Characters (Tell me about the characters in the book. You are to include their role in the book, a physical description of their appearance and a description of their personality)…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 11 Animal Farm

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After a few hours when all of the animals were in a deep sleep, Napoleon walked down to the shed with Pilkington to observe Napoleon’s livestock. At this point, Napoleon and all of the farmers were very drunk off of Napoleon’s homemade whiskey. Little did they know that Squealer wasn’t drunk at all and had a plan to kill Napoleon for power. Squealer had a big mouth, so he had to tell the animals, Squealer had persuaded the animals to hate Napoleon, and that he himself was going to make the farm a better place. The animals were cheering for squealer; this commotion resulted in Pilkington snooping into the barn.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics