Preview

Animal Testing

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
328 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Testing
Animal testing has many advantages.
Medical research involving animals has dramatically improved the health of the human race. Without animal testing, the cure for polio would not exist and diabetics would suffer or die from their disease. Despite these benefits, some people believe that animals should be not be used for testing medical techniques and drugs. This essay will outline the advantages of animal testing.

Animal testing allows scientists to test and create new drugs. Animals such as monkeys or rabbits have similar physical processes to humans. This allows scientists to test the effects of certain drugs. If a drug produces adverse effects in animals it is probably unfit for human use.

Animal testing is cheap. There is a large supply of animals for medical research. Animals are easily bred, and maintained safely in controlled labs. The costs of testing in humans would be extremely high.

Many people argue that animal testing is cruel. In some cases this is true. However it would be much more cruel to test new drugs on people or children, or to let people die because there was not enough information about a drug. Furthermore, legislation in most countries sets standards for animal treatment, and laboratories have guidelines to prevent cruelty.

Opponents of animal research also say that information from animals does not apply to humans. They point to certain commercial drugs which have been withdrawn because of side-effects in humans While it is true that animal systems differ from human systems, there are enough similarities to apply information from animals to humans.

Animal rights campaigners claim that we don’t need new tests because we already have vast amounts of information. However, many new deadly infections appear every year and new treatments and drugs are needed to combat these deadly plagues.

Animal testing is needed in the world we live in. Our responsibility is to manage the animals in our care and balance their suffering

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Leonard Thompson Biography

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the first place, the research that we gain from testing on animals helps them just as much as it helps the us. According the California Biomedical Research Association, “Animal research has helped develop many animal vaccines to fight diseases such as rabies and distemper in dogs and cats, feline leukemia, infectious hepatitis virus, tetanus, and has assisted in the development of treatments for heartworm.”…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cruel, inhumane, and unnecessary. Those are just a few of the terms that come to mind when I think about animal testing. Animal testing has been a heated topic of debate for many years, throughout classrooms and medical facilities alike. In many cases, animal testing has proven to be a rather inaccurate method for testing human medications and cosmetics. For example, in the book, Animal Research Takes Lives: Humans and Animals Both Suffer by Betty Overell, the founder of the New Zealand Anti-Vivisection Society, claimed that in 1983, the painkiller Butazolidin (by t -z l -d n) caused nearly 600 human deaths in the United States alone. These deaths were not foreseen beforehand, as the test subjects were animals, not humans. Overell went on to explain that none of the many different species tested on experienced any adverse side-effects to the medication, yet it caused many complications when taken by humans (Overell 290). In addition to inaccuracy, animal testing is inhumane to the animals involved, both during testing and while they are awaiting testing, and lastly, is unnecessary due to the advancements in the field of medical research.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Striking Worker

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Obrero en huelga, asesinado “Striking Worker Assassinated” by Manuel Alvarez Bravo is a representation of war through politics. He captures the image of reality of what people don’t want to grasp and accept. Bravo’s picture represents everyone in Mexico and throughout the world who had to fight for their rights during the time period in which the time photo was taken. Bravo was risky with his choice to take modest photos to show the truth of what was happening, promoting awareness. I think a lot of people would think it is immoral to capture dark moments including death that is so dramatic such as this photograph. I also agree believing that isn’t moral to capture the essence of a soulless body. Although Bravo had no intentions to demoralise but rather to make a statement about war some might not agree with his statement. It is hard for me to find a mutual ground on how I feel about photos similar to this one. For one, I find it disrespectful on a personal level to expose the worker in his condition of his death and allow it to become art. On the other hand I respect the artist for promoting awareness about the situation and allowing it to be recognized all over. I think making people and victims their subject in art and expression isn’t the right way to address what is really going on in the world. Especially those which travel the world in search of dark photos such as this to not make the political statement but simply for the money and recognition. Given this wasn’t Bravo’s intentions, but there are still those out there to do such things. If we look back at Mills Utilitarian’s outlook on pursuing happiness one might say that Bravo did not hurt anyone in promoting the awareness through his art assuming the worker either had no family member or that they had accepted Bravo’s intentions. In the end, I still find myself stuck in the middle of how I feel towards photography to create statements. In the end there is no beauty in art according to Tolstoy but rather…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first reason why we shouldn’t have animal testing is because animals are getting hurt or abused. “Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year.” The chemicals that the people are using are burning or other worse things to them. The chemicals that they use on the animals could hurt or kill them. Over half of side effects cannot be detected in…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Benefits

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. We all drank Kool-Aid on that one, me included. The problem is that animal testing hasn’t helped improved, and it’s time we stopped dancing around the problem…We need to refocus and adapt new methodologies for use in humans to understand disease biology in humans”.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Inaccurate

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animal testing has lead to the deaths of animals in horrible ways and is very inhumane, with modern technology we shouldn’t have to resort to such awful actions and we don’t need to there are many alternatives to animal testing and the alternatives can be cheaper and more accurate.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, everything about animal testing is very unethical and immoral. Many people are aware that animal testing goes on, but most people don't know the extremes that scientists will go to for research purposes. The sad truth is that if most people actually…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although there has been many advances in drugs and treatments for certain diseases and conditions due to animal testing, not all of them have been…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing - 18

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Animal testing is not just restricted to product testing, but goes well beyond that. It is widely used for the development of medical procedures and to gain scientific knowledge. Other than mice, rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs, the lengthy list of animals used in research labs also includes fruit flies, frogs, cats, dogs, pigs and non-human primates. It is estimated that more than 100 million animals fall prey to animal testing every year.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is a cruel and ineffective medical practice that produces unreliable results that should be illegal and those laboratories should use safer alternatives that will provide more accurate results.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Researchers need to test medicine using advanced technology not on animals. All researchers around the world need to find a safer more accurate way to test medication. If researchers keep using animals, their results will always be different for humans and they will never find a solution that will help people with their health. There are ways to test medication that are safer, faster, and cheaper than animal testing. If researchers use the technology animal testing will be eliminated from…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, many people debate whether or not using animals in research is humane. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. [2] Proponents of animal testing state that it has enabled the development of numerous life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, while opponents state that animal testing is cruel and often yields irrelevant results because animals are so different from human beings. Many different animals are used in scientific studies such as rabbits, mice, primates, dogs, cats, pigs, and cows. I believe that animal testing is beneficial because it provides opportunities to improve the lives of both humans and animals.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to some national statistics, nearly two-thirds of all animal research has little or nothing to do with curing human diseases or advancing human medicine. Animals testing prolong the suffering of people waiting for effective cures by misleading experimenters in the wrong direction, and wasting resources that could have been spent on more relevant research. Humans and animals may have brains, hearts, lungs, arteries, kidneys, and so on; but animals bodies are made up differently. Dogs for example, they walk on all fours; humans do not use four legs to walk. So to do an experiment that deals with animals legs compared to human leg would be a wasteful matter, dogs legs are formatted different.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If we ever want to find cures for major diseases.If diseases such as AIDS and cancer are ever to be cured resaerch on animals will have to continue(2facts.com). Deadly diseases are allways going to be around unless we continue to research on animals.With continuous research one day we may find a cure for a major illness. The FDA requires that all newly developed drugs to be tested on animals(2facts.com). This is in case any negative effects occur we will know before it is used on humans. If we want to improve in medical advancements animals are allways…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Is Wrong

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. … We all drank the Kool-Aid on that one, me included. … The problem is that [animal testing] hasn’t worked, and it’s time we stopped dancing around the problem. … We need to refocus and adapt new methodologies for use in humans to understand disease biology in humans.” (Unknown, PETA)…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays