Animal Testing Is Inhumane

What do Febreze and animals have in common? Over one hundred million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in specifically U.S. labs every year. Febreeze is one of the companies that test its products on animals. Imagine cruel scientists forcing caustic chemicals into the eyes of rabbits and applying them on an animal's shaved and bare skin. Animal testing is cruel and is definitely not necessary. Animal testing is inhumane, has inconclusive evidence, and has better alternatives. Animal is tested to be proven as inhumane. Scientists operate harsh actions that are cruel to the animal population. They test new drugs by infecting animals with diseases; scientists also poison animals for toxicity testing, burn the animal’s bare skin, which causes brain damage, and also implants electrodes into the brain. For some of these protocols, animals could be forced to live without food and water, live in long-term social isolation, and being separated from one’s own infant. From
It gives useless information, that does not help the human society. For example, 92% of drugs passed by animal tests fail when first tried on humans because they’re useless. Only two percent of illnesses are ever seen in animals, which proves that animal testing doesn’t have a purpose in helping humans. Each animal has a different body and is affected by specific things that other things may not be affected by. Scientists try to simulate animals to allow them to have certain conditions to make the drug useful. For example, heart attacks are simulated in dogs by compressing a coronary artery with a noose. Also, the results of animal experiments can be easily manipulated. The journal Annals of Internal Medicine stated that universities often exaggerate results of animal testing and promotes research that has unreliable evidence to human health. The facts that are given from these experiments don’t provide key facts to help