Review
Anita Desai’s ‘in custody’: Unlocking the web of time and space
Bhasha Shukla Sharma
Department of Humanities, University Institute of Technology, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, Bhopal. (M.P), India. E-mail: Bhasha.shukla@gmail.com. Tel: 9826090200.
Accepted 6 August, 2011
This paper attempts to semiotically interpret the use of time and place as narrative device in Anita Desai’s ‘In Custody’. Space and time have aroused the curiosity of people for many centuries. It has been central to philosophy from its inception. In literature, there is no other device which captures imagination of the narrative in both temporal and spatial implications. Time and space are regarded as substrata of culture. Here is an attempt to outline a contemporary view on the hierarchy of spatial and temporal structures. The ‘conceptual primitiveness’ has been revisited through the study of In Custody. Marred by time and place, the protagonist moves in search of his identity. The presentation of the characters is very near to the life in twentieth century India, ‘True to the temper of our times, there are no heroes, no big chested ideologies, and no utopias that will provide complete solutions to our problems’ (Das, 2002). Key words: Time-space, semiotics, culture, post-colonial literature, twentieth century India. INTRODUCTION Concept of time and space Semiotics is the science of signs. ‘We are always surrounded by signs. Everything is a sign’ (Guivand, 1975: 90). ‘A major thrust of semiotic research is the examination of codes (sign system) and the underlying rules that facilitate interpretability in the use of signs’ (Sharma, 2007). Semiotic analysis of any text has two meanings, denotative and connotative in nature. We are aware of the denotative meaning which refers to the sign it stands for.
References: Augé M (1995). Non-places. Introduction to anthropology of super modernity. London / New York: S Verso, pp. 75-115. Bakhtin M (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Ed. Michael Holquist, trans. Caryl Emerson & M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press. Das G (2002). “The Elephant Paradigm-India wrestles with change” Penguin books, New Delhi, p. 1, 28, 85. Desai A (2008). In Custody (New Delhi: Random House). (Hereafter the work would be cited as IC). Lotman YM (2000). Universe of the Mind. A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Sharma BS (2007). Shakespearean Dramas- a semiotic approach. B.R.Publishing: Delhi, 110p. Shukla HL (1994.) Semiotica Indica: Aryan books International, New Delhi