Preview

Annotated Bibliography: No Free Speech Without Hate Speech

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
335 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Annotated Bibliography: No Free Speech Without Hate Speech
No Free Speech Without Hate Speech:
An Annotated Bibliography
Minder, Raphael. "Crackdowns on Free Speech Rise Across a Europe Wary of Terror." The New York Times. The New York Times, 25 Feb. 2016. Web. 20 June 2016. In this web article, Minder highlights the increased use of hate speech bans and anti-terrorism laws to prosecute illegal protestors in Spain. He alerts us to the fact that protestors claim that these laws are being misapplied to silence opposition. Minder, a graduate of both Oxford and Columbia University where he received a Masters in journalism, notes the recent strengthening of many of these laws to fight the Islamic State. His main example is a case involving street puppeteers who face charges of promoting hate and


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sean McElwee overall claim in "The Case for Censoring Hate Speech" , is showing how people are easily influenced by the media, websites known as Reddit, Facebook, and twitter. Which allow bigot comments, #hashtags, and remarks to certain touchy topics. The article also talks about the two targets of hate speech, one being a way to target a minority and uplift sectarians of the world. The author uses words in the text to show a serious, concerned and progressive tone for the audience .In the article the author shows how he is progressive, by mentioning how we need to all blame ourselves and put forth effort to fix it.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1988 was a great year for Larry Flynt, the publisher of a highly criticized magazine called, “Hustler.” This magazine was unlike any of its predictors, such as Playboy. While sexuality was on the rise, so were “new” ways to do it. Hustlers’ publisher, Larry Flynt was merely exposing what people were already doing. This does not mean that everyone had the same sexual desires as everyone else, but he did become popularized by certain “hardcore” sexually active persons. While he became a hero amongst some, there seems to have been more against what Flynt was doing. It has been documented that even some of his staff did not agree, saying that he was making men out to be rapists, and making comparisons to men being like “stud bulls,” wanting to have sex with “everything in sight.”…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Given the narrow basis for the constitutionality of legislation restricting hate speech, Rothstein J. held that additional language of the Saskatchewan Code extending to expression that "ridicules, belittles or otherwise affronts the dignity" of persons on the basis of a prohibited ground was not justified under s. 1 of the Charter, and thus of no force and…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States of America guarantees freedom of speech for every man and woman. This rudimentary right, ratified in 1791, still stands today; however, controversial speech faces censorship. In the book, Freedom of Speech: Mightier Than the Sword, author David Shipler argues that conversing about controversial topics can bring a better understanding of the issue. In the final section of the book, Plays, Shipler discusses one of the most controversial topics of the past seventy years: the Israel-Palestine conflict. While touching on the history of the conflict, Shipler discusses the censoring Israel-Palestine plays.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Women, sexual assault victims, people of color, transgender students. College campuses have created “safe spaces” for all sorts of marginalized groups. But in the process, one member of the campus community has lost precious real estate. Free speech” (1). This quote from the article “Free Speech is Flunking Out on College Campuses” by Catherine Rampell introduces the idea that the right to freedom of speech is being squashed. All over the country, colleges are taking away this right from their students in order to protect others, but in reality, they are only stripping them of what is protected under the Constitution. Censorship has spread to social media apps causing students to be in constant danger of being accused of harassment. Claims…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, guarantees our freedom of expression, as it is written in the constitution, “The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their statements; and the freedom of the press, one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.” This clause is the based foundation of the articles: “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Be Regulated” by Ronald Eissens, and “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Not Be Regulated” by Sandy Starr, in which both authors reveled their opinions and standing on this issue by using different styles and presenting their ideas in different ways.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social media a toxic environment where humans, hide themselves behind a false identity to hurt one another and can get away with it. Turkle describes how technology has affected human interaction by providing a space to hide from the real world. Turkle writes, “We re-create ourselves as online personae in games or virtual worlds and give ourselves new bodies, homes, jobs, and romances” (Turkle 494). Turkle explains how technology allows humans to create a virtual reality that become a reality for them. In fact, when a human is affected by their virtual reality it is dangerous because they forget part of the real world. For instance, the awareness of how words can hurt another, persons emotions. This happens a lot where people do not realize the harm they cause online but there is also those that…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the debate over censorship of hate speech on college campuses, the opponents conclude that colleges should censor hate speech on campus because minorities have the civil right to equal enjoyment of education, free of harassment. On the other side of the debate, the supporters conclude that we should not censor hate speech on campus because students have a right to academic freedom. In this essay I will conclude that colleges should not censor hate speech.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1959 a documentary was produced entitled The Hate that Hate Produced which took a look at the Islamic nation and their feelings towards white people. The program was televised and broadcasted over New York television stations for the entire city to see. Malcolm X wanted to go ahead with the broadcasting of the program but Elijah Muhammad was a bit more reluctant. He felt that this would bring unwarranted attention toward the nation Islam and he felt it would be counterproductive to their cause. Malcolm however felt that this would be a great way to expose the nation of Islam and invite new members who felt they did not want to join the ongoing civil rights movement. Muhammad reluctantly agreed to the broadcast, but this would be the begging of the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech On Campus

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Free speech is one of the most controversial and confusing of the amendments. Throw it into a college campus setting and it’s an extremely complex matter, especially when “Hate Speech” is involved. Many people have different views and definitions on what hate speech in tales, for instance in “Hate Speech on Campus”, Joseph S. Tuman, defines it as “Written or spoken words directed towards a particular group (typically although not exclusively a minority group) with the purpose or effect of verbally harassing and harming them” (413). A personal interpretation of hate speech is speech that attacks a person or group on the basis of race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. With this being said, hate speech is a form of free speech. By removing, or writing codes…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hate Speech Policy

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Since the Oklahoma City Bombing in 1995, the number of hate sites has increased from one to many. “Today, Simon Wiesenthal Center and the Anti-Defamation League have documented about 2,800 hate sites,” and growing (Leet, 288). Since globalization took place in our world, the internet has become a place where anyone is able to expose all sorts of information to the billions of eyes of the public. Globalization has it’s positive effects and also, increasingly, it’s negative; Hate speech on cyberhate sites is one of them. The United States is one of the most diverse countries in the world. There is however still a notion that the white people are the ‘superior race’. Racial discrimination is still very much alive in our world…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hateful speech and double standards is defined as a type of speech that attacks a person or group based on aspects such as gender, ethnic origin, religion and unjustly applies that principle or characteristic towards a specific group of people. Brugger, W., 2002. Ban on or protection of hate speech-some observations based on German and American law. Tul. Eur. & Civ. LF, 17, p.1.Throughout time there has been many arguments regarding the freedom of expression and the Hate-speech restriction in Europe and what can be done to better the issue, which has been explicitly discussed through the paper published by the University of Wisconsin Press by Thomas M. Keck. This Human rights dilemma, identifies specific ways in which the issue can be attacked…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although the policy of strategic incapacitation says different, in practice it seems that policing is favored above the right to free speech. As there is no longer an opportunity for negotiation in the modern regime, police now are the only group to discern where, when and how a protest may take place, and the protesters must thoroughly comply or loose their right to protest altogether (Gillham, 87). Furthermore, in the name of preparing for such events, surveillance is implemented to collect information of the protesting groups. For example, infiltrating and monitoring group activity through meetings and their use of internet communications is common practice. Perhaps more notably within strategic incapacitation tactics, however, is the utilization of CCTV or police videographers to monitor the protests as they occur (Gillam, 90). In operation, this exploits evidence of possible criminality or unfavorable images among the protesting crowd, producing information about the protesters that could be recalled should the group organize in the future. The strategies mentioned above operate under restrictive efforts and secret surveillance, and are entirely contingent on selective police reasonings. Citizens are in fear of repression and retribution at the hand of their…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The topic of hate speech and the First Amendment is considered extremely sensitive to many citizens. The First Amendment protects their right of freedom of speech, the right to provide their views on a wide matter of subjects. The controversial issue at hand is whether or not hate speech should be protected in the First Amendment or not. On the one hand, every citizen should have the right to freedom of speech, regardless of the topic. On the other hand, hate speech is seen as a dangerous form of speech that can cause serious issues in the long run. The question arises: how should America react to hate speech? American citizens should not view responding to hate speech as a political duty.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 2016 one would think that they have the ability to speak their mind. Thinking you can speak your mind is the equivalent of black people thinking they are free. Freedom of speech is limited to your audiance, I can sit here today and say I hate white people. If my audiance also hates white people, I now have the freedom to share my hate. Until we realize that our thoughts, actions and reactions are being guided, we will never learn to think outside the box. Donald Trump is so popular because the reality is, if no one cares to say SOME (a lot) of white people hate any race that is not white. This is the only reason that Trump is able to have freedom of speech, his audience is like minded.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays