Preview

Annotated Bibliography: South Korea

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
535 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Annotated Bibliography: South Korea
Phuc Le
Professor Patton
3/21/2014
Annotated Bibliography
Sheen, Seongho. Grudging partner: South Korea: Asian affairs, 2003.
Grudging partner article explains about the importance of U.S military toward South Korea’s economy and security relationship. South Korea has worked closely with U.S. military forces in maintaining a strong alliance with the United States. Most of South Korea believes that the U.S. military presence is crucial for South Korea’s national security in fighting with North Korea.
Seongho gave numerous details about the importance of United States presence in the South Korea. He also supported more information about the complex relationship between the North and the South Korea. This article helps me a lot in finding information for my research. It provides me various details about the strong relationship between the South Korea and the United States and how these two countries support each other.
…show more content…
US airpower in Korea: Air& Space Power Journal, 2005.
In the “US airpower in Korea” article,The US military presence in South Korea stops North Korean nuclear ambitions. If North Korea develops nuclear weapon, it would be a serious threat to the security and peace of every nations in Asia even the US. US forces in Japan, Guam, Alaska, and other locations can serve as a deterrent to North Korea’s nuclear ambitions.
Mark gave some details about the importance of the US presence in Asian area and how the US military tries to stop North Korea’s nuclear ambition. If North Korea can make nuclear weapon, it will bring negative effects on the peace and security in the area. Through the article, I know more about the importance of nuclear weapon in military and how it will be if the North Korea develops nuclear weapon.
Cotter, Michael. Revitalizing the partnership: the U.S. and Iraq a year after withdrawal: American Diplomacy, Feb. 20,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    From that point forward, even after the Korean War had ended in July 1953, the United States’ military and national security spending remained at levels unthinkable prior to Korea. Indeed, the decisions made in 1950 stood practically unchallenged for nearly two generations. The historical significance is that it left a legacy of resentment and the imperfection of the United States domestic and foreign policies. Over the long haul of the Cold War, the Korean rearmament effort and the precedents it set came at a very high price, a price that went far beyond actual military expenditures. The economic, social, and political costs resulting from the decisions made during Korea are perhaps immeasurable, for there was no real “peace dividend” at the end of the Korean War. Pierpaoli references, Robert H. Wiebe observation that the Korean conflict resulted in the permanent institutionalization of an ongoing trend in twentieth-century American history which was the detachment of the government from the people. The Korean experience also solidified and institutionalized the Cold War mentality. Truman and his successors held the “vital center” of American politics by focusing much of the nation’s attention and…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The assistance of the Soviet Union is required for the further development of the Korean economy and culture.…

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Very few defense analysts question the need to keep substantial U.S. forces based in South Korea to deter North Korea from invading or attacking its southern neighbor. Instead, their concerns relate to four main issues: the condition and location of U.S. bases in South Korea, the instability in Army units that results partly from supporting large numbers of one year tours in South Korea, the quality of life of soldiers assigned to those tours, and whether Army units based in South Korea should be made more available to respond to conflicts elsewhere in the…

    • 4785 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pf con case

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Subpoint A – Nuclear proliferation is an action fueled by fear and if there is increase in military force interference, that fear will be legitimized. According to the article “Why Countries Build Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century” by Zachary Keck, “Iran’s nuclear program is better explained, then, by the rise in the potential conventional threat the U.S. poses to the Iran.” As many countries are, Iran was obviously intimidated by the massive military force of the U.S. and made the decision to begin proliferating nuclear weapons. And if the U.S. uses military force as an act to prevent nuclear proliferation, that goal may not be fulfilled.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We look at , “… despite tensions between Pyongyang and Beijing, their ally China will probably protect them from harsher UN Security Council sanctions even if they conduct another provocation ” (Everard). What John is trying to say is that, even if Pyongyang is having tension with Beijing if something were to happen to them, China will step in and protect them. The writer uses appeal to authority to China, showing how it is still in higher power even if they are involved in their own issues, but are still able to step in a help their small provinces. Then he continues his opEd with ,“ By the time the new president is inaugurated, North Korea may feel strong enough to demand that he or she sign a peace treaty with it (technically the Korean War never ended) and agree to halt the annual US-South Korean military exercises -- that is, that the United States caves in to North Korean demands” (Everard). In this quote, it clearly states the North Korean government wants to sign a peace treaty thus they might stop their experiments with nuclear programs. This seen as a cause and effect because the start of the situation was US trying to…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fareed Zakaria begins his article by highlighting the worrisome and dangerous tension between the United States and North Korea, which the Trump administration has escalated. North Korea has possessed nuclear weapons for ten years prior to the Trump administration. This article illustrates how the Trump administration added unnecessary pressure to an already delicate situation. For example, Sec. of State Rex Tillerson ended the era a strategic patience with N. Korea and Trump threatened N. Korea with a tweet stating, “fire and fury like the world has never seen before,” indicating a massive military strike. Zakaria, however, believes that these are cheap and empty threats, ultimately weakening the prestige and power of the United States. Zakaria’s main point is that Trump always makes outlandish threats, but he never delivers.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Despite the profits of the entry in the war, there were some reasons preventing the United States involved in the war. Because North Korea’s invasion was likely backed by the USSR, if the United States failed to handle the situation properly, a World War III might happen; this would lead to huge loss of U.S. personal and substantial financial costs. Other than that, because China borders North Korea and China was another major Communist country, the United States intervention could lead to war with China.…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1950s it was important for America to show its strength against communism and the soviets that they had the power to fight back, so they got the UN to ratify a war against North Korea when South-Korea was attacked. This resulted in an American led war against the North Koreans which later on ended up in standstill on both parts. America was the big factor in helping defending the south, and to what purpose? South Korea was at this time very un-industrialized, and they had no rich mineral resources to pay America later, and to this day South Korea hasn’t paid a dime to the US for the war effort. This shows us that America wasn’t helping for the cause of money or recourses, but rather to help the South Koreans stop the invading North Koreans. Although America didn’t get any war loot, they shook the communist regimes showing that they are ready for war, which is a political plot, and America gained a lot of ground on that field in this short-lived war.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first thing that has to be noted about the Korean War is the indirect confrontation of the superpowers thus united states of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). These two super powers were of different ideology and beliefs. The USA believed in democracy and was capitalist whilst the USSR was more of dictatorship and was communists. The USSR came in Korea to support the Northern part of Korea which was under the rule of the communist, Kim ll Sung, after the defeat of Japan by the USA. The USSR supported the south because of its ‘sphere of influence’. The USSR saw Korea as an easy access to the newly ‘born’ communist Japan. It had its own economical interests. On the other hand, the USA under the approval of the UN joined by giving military support to the anti-communist Dr.Syngman Rhee, the leader of the South Korea, for several reasons. Some of the reasons were; Truman was convinced that the attack by Kim II Sung was Stalin’s doing and saw it as a Russian plan to spread communism as widely as possible so she had to take action as soon as possible. Also, some Americans saw the invasion as similar to…

    • 1151 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This separation still has a monumental impact on the current events in Korea. To this day, the U.S. provides military support to South Korea, and agrees to defend them in case of another invasion. One example of how the result of the Korean War affects events today would be when North Korea fired artillery at the South Korean island of Yeonpyeong in 2010. As a part of their military training, the South Korean Army was shooting artillery into the water. Although the artillery did not land on North Korean soil, the North Korean military responded with an artillery fire on Yeonpyeong which was South Korean territory.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Given North Korea’s ideology on communism and Americans on capitalism, Americans are helping South Korea. American general Douglas MacArthur counterattacks North Korea all the way to the Yalu River as a way to show North Koreans the power that a capitalist country has. America saw this as an opportunity to convince South Korea to join their efforts because America was helping them fight back against North Korea. Furthermore, Senator Robert F. Taft explains, “with every available resource the American men in our armed forces who have been moved into Korea” (Capital Report, Senator Robert F. Taft). The quote goes into detail about how the United States Senate agreed to help South Korea by sending their troops to South Korea and helping provide them with every food and resource that was available.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Govt

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To better prepare for threats from weapon of mass destruction the United States should never under estimate the power and capability of foreign allies such as China, Russia, North Korea, Iran and Iraq to strike the United States. In addition, the National Resource Defense Counsel Report should keep track of the nuclear warheads that each country has. As…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Korean War

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States viewed the attack on the South as evidence that communism would actively challenge the free world and revised its security perimeter to include maintaining a non-communist South Korea. The UN sent forces composed of troops from 15 nations to the peninsula to stop the communist advance.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us Foreign Policy

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The United State’s involvement in the Korean War was another important foreign policy that it divided the Korean Peninsula into two different countries. In order to prevent Communism from spreading, the United State decided to fight with South Korea against when North…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After being under the Japanese control, the United States and the USSR shared control of the Korean Peninsula. Korea was divided at the 38th parallel with the Soviet Union taking control of the northern area and the U.S. in control of the southern area (Gertz 1). Both rivaling sides provided military support and created new governments friendly to each respective superpower. Moreover, it also showed the weak handed control of the U.S. in South Korea. They were limited in the amount of military support, “lacking tanks, aircrafts and all but small amounts of field artillery” (Hickey). Korea presents to be moving towards a more communist rule. As the War continued in Korea, the United States showed no interest in Korea. This sudden disinterest in Korea was due to it having no geopolitical significance (Hickey). Unfortunately, the USSR took this as an opportunity to extended communism by providing military support for North Korean forces to capture almost all of the peninsula in a matter of months. In the end the Korean War showed American and Soviet revolutionary aid in the spread or resistance of communist expansion in Asia through direct military…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays