As Anti-Federalists, we argued for civil rights, and power to the people. For what seemed like an eternity, we had debated over the ratification of the constitution. Many things were said with a lot of elaboration and detail to go in them, but ultimately, it came down to four core words. Power to the people. One of the reasons that we had rejected the new central government was because it possessed too much power, and it ripped away the prestige for the states, and threatened their sovereignty. It did the same to the …show more content…
This would be required for a safe and secure society because that was, everyone’s input will be included and accounted for, and the silenced will be given a voice. When this happens, the states will truly take a step forward in economic and scientific growth, advancement and enhancement as a whole. It also paves a new way for the states to not only survive, but thrive as a nation. It would be spectacular to see such in action, due to the people that have an unproportional amount of knowledge about the U.S. finally being able to do something about what’s going on, and able to show a larger amount of people in a shorter span of time, thus making it easier to take action about what happens in the