Preview

Anti-Pluralists Vs Federalists

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
243 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anti-Pluralists Vs Federalists
Federalists vs. Antifederalists After the Constitution of the United States was written in 1787 it was required that nine of the thirteen states would need to ratify it before it became valid. As the debate over the Constitution continued, two opposing sides materialized: the Federalists and the AntiFederalists. The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and believed that it gave the federal government too much power, while taking away the power of the individual states. They also wanted a bill of rights to guarantee certain liberties, which the Constitution did not have at the time. They also thought the federal government created would not represent the normal citizen very well. In addition, they argued that as a federal government,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    debates. People that supported the Constitution argued that many state constitutions already did the job of protecting citizens’ rights. Supporters of the Constitution believed that these rights already existed as natural rights, even though they were not listed. The anti-federalists disagreed and believed there should be a list of rights. They feared that the stronger national government would abuse individual rights. The anti-federalists basically wanted a list of individual…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist believed that there should be a strong, central government in order to maintain domestic security and liberty. The federalist wanted the constitution to be ratified. The Anti-Federalists wanted to bar the constitution that was drafted from being ratified. They felt that this gave the government too much power. They argued that the drafters were all part of the colonial Aristocracy, and therefore, could not and would not stand for the common good of the nation, but would instead be overbearing, and hostile to the common people.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The anti-federalists were led by Thomas Jefferson. They believed the Constitution alone did not protect the rights of the people. They later added the Bill of Rights to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalists were people who wanted and believed in the new Constitution. They had people who disagreed with them called the Anti-Federalists. The Federalist Party originated in opposition to the Democratic-Republican Party.Emphasized commercial and diplomatic harmony with Britain following the signing of the 1794 Jay Treaty. The party made a lasting impact by laying the foundations of a national economy, creating a national judicial system and formulating principles of foreign policy.Founded in 1792, dissolved in 1824.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Doc. 6) They wanted to fix the constitution, because there were many things that needed to be fixed, so we could have a stronger government. The Federalist were afraid that the United States would have bad things happen and they were trying to prevent it from happening. (Doc. 4) Although the Anti-Federalist had their own beliefs about the constitution.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 the Constitution was written and submitted to the states for ratification, this leading to months of fierce debate. Some states welcomed the new Constitution but others were fearful of it. They were afraid that this would be just like being under the control of Great Britain, which they just broke free from. But the rest of the states saw this as a good thing and very necessary for America to strive.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists were individuals who supported the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution as stated in the book, "the critics of the Constitution were by no means a unified group" (Faragher, 180). I found it interesting that the Constitution was initially influenced by the Federalist model in regards to interpretation but the pendulum has now swung in the opposite direction to a more Anti-Federalist approach (Content 8-2). The Constitution was ratified and the Federalists won for numerous reasons. The Anti-Federalists had delayed representation while the Federalists promised to amend the Constitution to better protect individual's rights (Faragher, 181). Overall, it was the Federalist representation, planning,…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What's the difference between a Federalist and an Anti-federalist? Why did they have different perspectives on the ratification of the Constitution? Republicans and Democrats are not the original political parties. As i'm getting older i will be eligible to vote at the age 18, I will know the difference between the two. The Political parties had changed over the year where now the rules are way different back then.…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Powers of the national government were not well defined in the constitution. The Anti-Federalists opposed this, and they also took issue with the elastic and supremacy clause which they felt could give the national government the power to increase its own power. The Anti-Federalists wanted more defined powers of the national government in the Constitution.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    under the Articles of Confederation, just edit it a little. They wanted the states to hold the supreme power rather than the national government. Most feared that the constitution would turn our government into a monarchy. Brutus I made the statement, “And are by this clause invested with the power of making all laws, proper and necessary, for carrying all these into execution; and they may so exercise this power as entirely to annihilate all the state governments, and reduce this country to one single government.“ The name Anti-federalist is actually misleading, they were actually more for federalism than the federalist, as they wanted the power more separated to the states. Their thoughts were that a government under the constitution would lead to corruption as the power hungry federal government would become corrupt and try to consolidate all of the power.“In the new Constitution, the President and Senate have all the executive, and two thirds of the legislative power. In some weighty instances, (as making all kinds of treaties, which are to be the laws of the land,) they have the whole legislative and executive powers. They, jointly, appoint all officers, civil and military; and they (the Senate) try all impeachments, either of their own members or of the officers appointed by themselves.“ -Richard Henry…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The antifederalists rallied behind the ideologies of the Revolution. They saw the federalists as monarchical, detouring from the wants and needs of the people in search for national glory. Patrick Henry and Edmund Randolph both feared that states would lose their right to govern their own people and thus, each state should be able to govern as its own independent entity. They stressed the importance of virtues representation, fearing the proposed congress would be too much like parliament, and the president too much like a king. However, the antifederalists could not agree on an alternative form of government that would fit their agrarian “good society.” They pressed for a Bill of Rights, to ensure individuals would keep their rights and the “ordinary people” would not be forgotten by the monarchs in charge. They wanted to ensure that Revolutionary themes of sovereignty and direct representation would not be lost with the new constitution, placing more importance on their proposed Bill of…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year of 1787, when delegates gathered in Philadelphia to the draft a new constitution for the country. Curtain groups of people at the time think that the old document "Article of Confederation" was going to divide this country apart. At the time, there were two parties, one opposed the idea of drafting the new constitution, the Anti Federalists. The other is the Federalist, who supported the idea. The Anti-federalists argued that the new constitution would post a threat to its people freedom and liberty. They said that the constitution would give the central government too much power, and at the end may ends up like their mother land, England. But, the Federalists have a totally different view on this matter. The federalists argued that…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were against the ratification of the Constitution because they felt that the constitution gave the national government too much power, especially over the states. Their central beliefs of government was that it should be focused on a strict interpretation of the Constitution and its necessary and proper clause. Instead of the government having implied powers given to them by the elastic clause, the antifederalists wanted the government to just stick to its already delegated powers stated in the document. In addition, since the Antifederalists wanted the states and the people to have more power over the government, they favored a small national one. They also believed that once the central government has too much power that they’ll impose on the rights of the people almost like the old monarchy.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Vs Federalism

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Federalists favored a balanced relationship with the federal and state government. For example, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were in favor of a strong central government. They saw that the states had too much power and thought that under the new constitution , the new national government needed to be stronger. On the other hand, the Anti-federalists favored a weaker national government with power belonging to the states. For example, Patrick Henry favored this idea that the state has most of the power.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays