Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Antony vs Cassius

Good Essays
650 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Antony vs Cassius
Antony and Cassius already have a lot of power in Roman society, but who would make a better leader? Leaders in the past have shown that they are a good leader by showing if they have faith, how persuasive they are and how much power they have. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony and Cassius both show that they are good leaders, but Antony is a better leader compare to Cassius. Antony and Cassius both compare to each other in faith and how pervasive they are; however they contrasted in power. To be a good leader you must have faith. In the play Juius Caesar Antony and Cassius both show it. When Antony was standing over Caesar’s body he said “O, pardon me, thou bleeding piece of earth, that I am meek and gentle with these butchers! Thou art the ruins of the noblest man that ever lived in the tyde of times… A curse shall light upon the limbs of me, domesticfury and fierce ciil strife shall cumber all the parts of Italy; Blood and destruction shall be so in use and dreadful objects so familiar,” (III, i, 277) Now that Antony is alone with Caesar’s body he speaks truthfully what he really think of the conspirators. Antony plans to revenge Caesar’s death. Antony has faith that he will do so because he is motivated by caser’s death. “men at some time are masters of their fates; The fault dear Brutus is not in our stars, but in our selfs, that we are underling”(I,ii,148) Cassius is still trying to get Brutus on his side, what Cassius is saying is that Rome’s own fault for being servile to one man. Men don’t have much control over their destinies, and it’s not anyone’s fault. Great leaders are persuasive. “yet Brutus says he was ambitious; And Brutus I an honorable man. I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, But here I am to speak what I do know. You all did love him once, not without cause….. Bear with me, my heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me. ” (III,ii, 99) This part of the speech, Antony got the crow to be on his side. “well Brutus thou art noble; yet I see thy honorable mettle may be wrought from that it is disposed. Therefore it is meet that noble minds keep ever with their likes; for who so firm that cannot be seduced?” (I, ii, 325) said Cassius. Even though Cassius thinks Brutus is a noble guy he thinks anyone could be manipulated.
Another quality leaders have is power. “friends, Romans, country men, lend me your ears!”(III, ii, 82) Antony said with power. Even though Antony promise he won’t bad mouth Caesars assassins… he made his speech so that people would go against the conspirators and lunch himself into a position of power. “why, man he doth bestride the narrow world like a colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs and peep about to find ourselves dishonorable graves.” (I, ii, 143) said Cassius as he tries to convince Brutus that Caesar needs to be taken down. He thinks Roman leaders are colossus then ask is he all powerfull? Or is he made out to be a bigger threat then he really is. Leaders in the past have shown that they are a good leader by showing if they have faith, how persuasive they are and how much power they have. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony and Cassius both show that they are good leaders, but Antony is a better leader compare to Cassius. Antony and Cassius both compare to each other in faith and how pervasive they are; however they contrasted in power.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after the last breaths of one of Rome’s most popular general, Julius Caesar, Antony and Brutus were speaking in front of the people of Rome. Both cunning leaders were nimble in the art of persuasion and manipulation. The beloved leaders used the Ethos, Pathos, and Logos methods of persuasion to sway the crowd to his respective view of the actions of the night and their former general Julius Caesar.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This experiment is concerned with identifying photosynthetic pigments found in spinach plants and determining the spectrum of light each absorbs. By using paper chromatography, different pigments of spinach leaves can be separated. The knowledge gained in this experiment is relevant to understanding how the process of photosynthesis works. A Real-world application for this includes the harvesting of clean energy sources, as scientific advances have led the way to artificial photosynthesis on the path to replace fossil fuels (Nath, 237).…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Brutus and Antony's funeral speeches from Act 3, Scene 2 of Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" offers a profound insight into the art of persuasive oratory. Both orators possess distinct styles and objectives, making it a compelling exercise to evaluate which speech is superior in terms of effectiveness. Brutus, driven by his noble intentions and adherence to republican principles, delivers a rational and logical speech. He employs rhetorical devices such as ethos, pathos, and logos to sway the crowd to his perspective.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Julius Caesar Bad

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As far as military strategy goes Cassius had the better brain for it. Brutus was not a very good military strategist. Cassius knew that it would be a good idea to kill Antony. He thought that Antony would talk the people into trying to kill Brutus and…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli once stated,“He who wishes to be obeyed must know how to command.” This seems simple, but some don’t understand, including most in the play Julius Caesar. Mark Antony, one of the few who understands how to command, is a loyal friend who is gifted with the ability to use rhetorics, and is able to appeal to people’s hearts. While Brutus uses force and facts, Antony is able to lift others up while conspiring against them. It is a skill that comes into play later in the tragedy when Caesar is killed Antony takes it into his own hands to get even with the conspirators. By being able to command respect Antony is able to turn the throng of citizens against Cassius, Brutus, and the others. This is why Mark Antony…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony deftly speaks to his audience in a way that requires them to challenge their preconceived characterizations of Brutus and Cassius. He intentionally expresses the deliberate opposite of what he genuinely wishes and excessively compliments the people to the point that they forget their own seemingly unwavering convictions. His finesse and dexterity in bending words and minds ultimately works to his favor. Antony accomplishes his initial goal to convince the Roman people to revenge Caesar’s demise. This achievement in and of itself exhibits…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In society, we often look to those in authority for guidance or clarification in times of darkness and distress. In these situations, we look to the most righteous and trustworthy of them all to be our candles in the darkness. Julius Caesar was murdered because a collection of conspirators assumed that he may in the future abuse his power. The conspirators were Cassius, Metellus, Ligarius, Cinna, Casca, Trebonius, and Brutus, Caesar's close friend. People who are used to being public speakers, such as public leaders are able to sway their audience in any direction they want with the assistance of logos, pathos, ethos. Antony and Brutus were equally honorable and well-respected, but after comparing the two funeral speeches , there’s no debate that Antony had the most effective speech because his excellent range of logos, ethos, and pathos.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus and Antony each gave their own speeches at Julius Caesar’s funeral to persuade the people of Rome to make them their new leader by using many rhetorical devices. Brutus came off as a traitor of Caesar, claiming that they killed Julius Caesar for the sake of Rome. He tried to overthrow what had occurred by striking fear into the people’s eyes, stating “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” By letting the people of Rome envision what horrible things and events would unfold if Caesar was still alive and ruler. He also uses fallacy to allow the audience to think about what their lives would be like tied down under Caesar’s rule then what it will be like with Caesar gone and…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, both of them used ethos in their speeches. Brutus was only able to persuade the people by implying them to believe that Caesar was too ambitious just because he said so, whereas Antony had actual reasons to be believable. "Believe me for my honor and have respect to mine honor that you may believe... not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more"(pg126:III:ii). Brutus, for a short while, convinced the crowd that Caesar was too ambitious and if he did not kill him, everyone would be slaves. "The noble Brutus told you that Caesar was ambitious...He hath brought many captives home to Rome, whose ransoms did the general coffers fill... yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man" (132,134: III: ii). Antony additionally mentions that he knows Caesar wept when the poor wept and…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Julius Caesar, Brutus exemplifies the perfect leader role by listening and understanding Cassius with empathy. In Act one scene two , lines ninety-eight through one-hundred and thirty-nine .It shows Brutus listening carefully to Cassius and taking into considering Cassius’s plan to kill Caesar. It is important to listen carefully to all idea propositioned to you. Take Thomas Jefferson for an example, he had to listen to 54 other delegates ideas and opinions in regards to writing the Declaration of Independence. In addition to getting his own opinion across in a respectful manner. Being able to take a step back and listen is an important trait to have if you want to be a leader or even successful in life. Winston Churchill once said,” Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak;…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cassius vs Brutus

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cassius formed the conspiracy with motives based solely on envy, and he believed that Caesar was not going to be a good enough ruler. He says: "...it doth amaze me A man of such feeble temper should So get the start of the majestic world And bear the palm alone." (I,ii,128-31) Cassius also thought that he was also much stronger than Caesar. Cassius says: "...Caesar said to me, `Dearest thou, Cassius, now Leap in with me into this angry flood, And swim to yonder point?' Upon the word Accoutred as I was, I plunged in and bade him follow; so indeed he did. The torrent roared...but ere we could arrive the point proposed, Caesar cried, `Help me Cassius, or I sink.'...So from the waves of Tiber Did I the tired Caesar: and this man Is now become a god and Cassius is A wretched creature...". (I,ii,102-117) Cassius had to save Caesar from the river, which draws him to the conclusion that he deserves recognition for his strength over Caesar. One of Brutus' flaws is that he is not very bright. He is an idealist; he doesn't think about the consequences of Caesar's murder. For example, when Cassius presented the idea of swearing an oath of secrecy within the conspiracy, Brutus assumes that all of the other men were as noble as he and would not tell…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caesar start

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Antony's funeral speech was much more effective because his use of nnsmsnsnmsmsmdmd ndmkdmd mxdm mxmmd. Mmcmcmmmd mcmmdmc mxmxmmc ckkckxmmd kfdlmmdm mddlmc k. Jdjdn nsnnnd nndndn jdmxm nxnmxn . Bdnxmx mfmcm nmmdPathos, ethos, and logos are three persuasive tools used by Antony and Brutus at Caesar's funeral. Both Brutus and Antony's speeches given, greatly impacted the citizens of Rome . This passage, Julius Caesar, is written by William Shakespeare. This is a play based on a historical event led by the tragedy of the Roman leader ,Caesar, who was killed by his disloyal friends. Within this passage, Brutus and a group of conspirators gathered together upon the action to betrayal Caesar and take over the city Rome. In addition, they all believed that Caesar did not deserve the throne and they had to destroy him. At Caesar’s funeral both Brutus and Antony created heartfelt speeches in order to persuade the flustered citizens of Rome. However, I can conclude that the logos, pathos, and ethos in Antony's speech was much more persuadable than Brutus's unfavorable speech.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cassius Domino Effect

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cassius’s is seen as the leader of the conspirators, the manipulative master behind the cruel plan. He, with many others, disdain Caesar for his arrogance, yet Cassius encompasses the same exact trait. His arrogance is shown in Act I, when he and Brutus are talking, and Cassius notices the unease in Brutus’ eyes when they believe Caesar is crowned. He says, “I was born as free as Caesar,” (1.2, 104). In this speech Cassius is trying to convey the idea that Brutus is as good as Caesar so that Brutus will be more inclined to join the conspiracy, but Cassius uses the first comparison of Caesar to explain that Caesar is no better than he. His cunning, manipulative nature bleeds through in his very first speech, his arrogance is clearly shown and his motives laid down. Cassius’ jealousy leads to his revulsion of Caesar. Only Caesar’s death being the answer to Cassius’ insecurities.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Composition

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the “Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, Cassius tries to convince Brutus to be King and to kill Caesar for the good of Rome. For example, when Cassius tells Brutus a story of a flood “For once, upon a raw and gusty day, The troubled Tiber chafing with her shores, Caesar said to me “Darest thou, Cassius, now Leap in with me into this angry flood, And swim to yonder point?”/Caesar cried Help me, Cassius, or I sink”(I, II, 100-104,111). This shows Caesar is weak and cannot even take care of himself. It helps Brutus because it will show Rome that Brutus would be a much stronger ruler. Another example, when Casca tells Cassius that Caesar rejected a crown three times and then “He fell down in the market place, and foamed at the mouth, and was speechless”(I, II, 252-253). This shows Caesar is not a strong ruler and shows that he has epilepsy. This helps Cassius because it will easily help him convince the citizens of Rome to over throw a ruler with epilepsy. In the end Cassius continues to try to convince Brutus to kill Caesar.…

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The art of manipulation and persuasion is truly effective when one is incompetent to the fact that they alone are not thinking for themselves. Since the beginning of time, humankind has wanted to have control. In some instances they will strive for power in ways that make them oblivious to right and wrong. Occasionally, they will go against what they are told to do and instead to what they want to do. In the play Julius Caesar the power of persuasion and manipulation of language is clear when two men, Brutus and Mark Antony, spiel to the people of their country, each attempting to gain the support of the populace over the death of Caesar. Even though Brutus establishes ethos throughout his speech, Mark Antony’s uses it to his advantage…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays