Preview

ANWR pro drilling essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
382 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ANWR pro drilling essay
ANWR Outline
I. Introduction
A. Context
1. 19 million square acres in Alaska’s coastal plain
2. A wildlife reservation preserve, abundant with vast habitats and oil reservoirs
B. Relevant
1. Drilling could possibly destroy the habitat and way of life for animals
2. It could also give the United States a 6 month supply of oil
3. Is the drilling worth it
C. Thesis statement
1. The United States Congress should allow drilling in ANWR due to the economic, environmental, and social benefits we would get from doing so

II. (Topic Sentence One-Economic Uprisings) The economic advantages of oil development in ANWR gives us one reason to drill
A. Evidence One-Job Increase-250,000 and 750,000 to be created from drilling (Doc B)
1. Job increases could keep some people out of poverty, could slightly boost the economy with more people spending money.
B. Evidence Two-Revenues to the State and Federal Treasury
2. $4.2 billion dollars in revenue could help the US in all sorts of things around the country.
C. Counterclaim
D. Rebuttal

III. (Topic Sentence Two-Environmental Balance) Drilling in ANWR wouldn’t affect the environment as badly as one thinks it will.
A. Evidence One-Oil Development and Habitat Coexistence (Doc )
1. Drilling would not cause harm to the ecosystems and habitats that lay inside ANWR.
B. Evidence Two-Small Percentage of ANWR Considered for Drilling (Doc )
1. 8% of ANWR considered for drilling, and even this 8% wouldn’t harm the environment and surrounding habitats
C. Counterclaim-Doc G- ANWR is a large birthing ground for Porcupine Caribou and drilling could hurt their habitat and their way of life
D. Rebuttal-Oil Development and Habitat Coexistence
1. Adams has watched the oil development first hand and knows it is possible for the drills to thrive without hurting the environment.

IV. (Topic Sentence Three-Social Perks) ANWR being drilled an affect the people in a positive way.
A. Evidence One-Energy Independence While

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the main issues is wildlife and how they will react to the pipeline. The pipeline runs through areas such as Kendall Island Migration Bird Sanctuary and other unprotected, but…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dwight R Lee Analysis

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his piece, Dwight R. Lee explains that with oil drilling the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, there would be many benefits as compared to the cost. He doesn’t deny that there would be risks associated with the drilling. However, he feels that they do not begin to compare to the benefits. He explains that the main reason that this has become such a hot topic is because of the high prices of gasoline and oil. One company that he looks at is the National Audubon Society. They are against opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling because they feel that it will “destroy the integrity.” This is the same company that owns the 26,000 acre Rainey Wildlife Sanctuary and opens it to drilling. By allowing this drilling, the Audubon Society has received more than $25 million. This has allowed them to own other wildlife and wilderness land.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States had great choice to make this past month in the Presidential Elections. The decision was to continue on our current path or start on a new one. A major point on the two candidates was on the domestic economic policies. Issues on the domestic economic policies were very different for both tickets in this year’s election. Differences were very clear on each party’s stances on drilling on Federal Land. Romney was very adamant on increasing drilling on Federal Land and also creating the much controversial Keystone XL Pipeline. During Obama’s first term, production of natural gas on the United States Federal Land has decreased from 35% to 21%. Though, his dismay of drilling has come after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in which millions of barrels of oil polluted vast areas in the Gulf of Mexico. This trend will be continuing, unless progress is made to ensure the safety of the environment while drilling. This is a main concern for the government, especially on domestic Federal Land.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Alaskan National Wilderness Refuge has been the topic of political debate for decades. A large, beautiful piece of the world, ANWR as it is often referred to, is not a only a refuge for hundreds of species of birds, fish and mammals, but also a political battleground that is used to ignite the debate on America’s dependence on foreign fuel sources. The possibility of drilling for oil in ANWR brings with it the promise of jobs, dependency from unstable countries for our fuel needs and a boost to our declining economy. However, drilling in this land also brings the possibility of destroying the habitat of birds that migrate to this area yearly, caribou that use this haven as a calving ground, fish that fill the rivers and lakes, as well as grizzly bears, wolves, elk and hundreds of other species that depend on this habitat for food, shelter and safety. There is no debate that there are passionate debates, important facts and amazing possibilities that concern both sides of this argument. And even if it were possible to remove political agenda from the table, it would still be a very difficult debate to win for either side. My hopes are to come to a conclusion that would benefit both parties involved. I strongly feel that any drilling in this area would be detrimental to the surrounding area, as well as bring possible harm to the countless animals, birds and fish that use this safe haven yearly for migration, calving and egg laying and feeding. The decision to either drill or not to drill may not have a direct impact on us now, but in the years to come, good or bad, we will all see the changes that this decision will have resulted in.…

    • 2026 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ANWR

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are several reasons why drilling should not be allowed in ANWR. One reason is that animals are on the brink of endangerment and extinction. Not talking about the ANWR animals…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sci 275 Bridger Tetons

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    destructive practices, such as drilling and mining. There are others who claim this area can…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dakota access pipeline has much risk in the aspects of environmental impact and the thousands of people protesting for the protection indian reservation, but these pipelines bring in huge economic gain. In the article, “Dakota Access Pipeline: What's at stake?” Written by Holly Yan, she explores the possible pros and cons of piping oil through North Dakota to Illinois. People are arguing that piping oil could be hazardous to native american land, but others say the U.S. needs the money. While some people see disaster government officials see dollar signs.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion drilling shouldn't be Allow in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge because it is more of an environmental issue. Due to the fact that oil and gas exploration and development in the (ANWR) would have a major effect on the water resource. It is most concerning because it’s a factor that contributes, negatively towards a wide variety of species that are inhabitant of that particular area that are being affected by limited resource of water that they need for their survival. The reason drilling is an issue because it can alter the character of an ecosystem. For example Arctic ecosystem is characterized by many complex interactions, and changes to one component may have secondary but significant effects on other ecosystem components. Which means oil exploration and development have substantially changed environments where they have occurred in Alaska’s central Arctic. Another reason drill is an issue because of factor that comes into play when drilling occurs such as oil spills, contaminated waste, and other sources of pollution have had measurable impacts on an environment. Like the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska and the more recent Deep-water Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico. These disasters have displayed that there is no safe way to drill for oil and gas in the Arctic refuge, no way to guarantee wildlife will not be harmed by resource extraction in the refuge and no way to ensure the Arctic refuge will be protected for future generations and if Congress allows oil and gas exploration on the coastal plain there are costly consequences that wildlife have to endure. Oil drilling presents a potential risk of oil spills; in the Arctic the impacts of such spills could be catastrophic. Spills are more dangerous here because the combination of a colder climate, slower plant growth rates and longer animal life spans hinder recovery efforts. Additionally, no technology currently…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the development of alternative sources of energy such as solar power and clean coal.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, animals are dying because of Hydrofracking accidents. Researchers discovered that there is a range of health risks that are related to fracking and the other parts of the process, such as the chemicals that are injected deep underground and the toxic compounds that rise to the surface.The construction of roads, drilling pads and pipelines for thousands of drilling operations are adding up and impacting rural communities and affecting America’s landscape. The clearing of thousands of acres of forests is leading to reduced and fragmented habitats and other potentially life-threatening impacts for wildlife. Animals are starving , on the edge of life or death. Anorexic animals are everywhere near gaslands.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America’s rank as the world’s leading superpower gives the nation unsurpassed clout throughout the rest of the world, but as the old saying goes “With great power comes great responsibility.” Many other nations not only rely on America’s economy for their own country’s survival, but they also look up to America with a hopeful sense for the future. The founding fathers of this great nation had excellent insight into the authority that America would one day possess, and thus they attempted to set many precedents that would lead the way for the nations that would choose to follow America’s example. Still today, every move that the American nation makes is carefully scrutinized by the other nations of the world. So, it is crucial that the United States ensure that as it moves forward, it does so with a noble and future oriented perception of its goals. Thus, drilling for oil in the Alaskan National Wildlife Reserve would be a colossal mistake for the United States, because drilling would be detrimental to the pristine indigenous environment, it would have little or no beneficial impact on the American or Global economy, and would poorly exemplify the ambitions that America should have.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The effects of the contamination of the water supply will impact our native tribe’s food source such as crops and animals. These affects should concern the government because of the contamination of lands and waters that run through the country. These pipelines run high risks of spillage on to the soil and water sources. The environment will be no longer a good use as a source of crops or a water supply if the oil pipeline is implemented. The native people have been living in these areas and have relied on food and water for these lands and should be reserved not only for Natives use but for even survival of these human beings (Los Angeles Times).…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking Effects

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Therefore, pollution by noise, water, and material will occur in the forest. All three of these pollutants will affect animals as well as humans and land. In order to drill, an area will first need to be clear cut for at least the size of the plant, therefore contributing to deforestation. Also, towns are not located in national forests, so unnatural roads must be made and traveled daily thus creating wear in the land. Tests performed by the Forest Service result in the death of over one half of the vegetation, two years after 75,000 gallons of hydraulic fracking fluid was sprayed across nearly an acre of land. Some people suggested that if the area sprayed was increased, then the damage done would be substantially less. The reasoning is that 75,000 gallons would have been spread lighter, however that is merely 1/50 the amount of fluid that could become hazardous from just a single well. Therefore, the affected area, holding the same ratio of the test, would be up to 50 acres of land, killing just over half the vegetation ("Protect Our Parks,…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oil Drilling in Alaska

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The president opposing this idea from the last few years is Barack Obama. He thought that the drilling would permanently…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Offshore Oil Drilling

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Offshore oil drilling is slowly destroying our environment. Over the past few years following the tragic oil spill in the gulf,…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays