Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Ap Global Review Sheet

Satisfactory Essays
397 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ap Global Review Sheet
HW #26
Read 317-341 (Postclassical 1 (Byzantine)
1. How did Justinian rule? Was he a benevolent or malevolent ruler, why?
2. When was the zenith of byzantine civilization, why?
3. What were some challenges to the Byzantine Empire?
4. Describe the social and economic characteristics of the Byzantine Empire
5. What were some differences b/w East & West Christians?

1. Justinian ruled in a way that would best restore the entire Roman Empire to its former glory. While he may not be considered the kindest of all rulers, he did care about his people and tried to help them live a good life while he was off trying to complete his goals. I would say that he was more of a benevolent ruler because he did do a lot of good in his time as a ruler and wasn’t too mean or harsh to his people.
2. I think that there are many things that could be considered the peak of the Byzantine civilization. One of them could be Justinian’s reforms concerning law. Another could be the arts including music, drama, and art. He funded many public works projects as well including bridges, roads, aqueducts, and churches. In that time he built the Hagia Sophia, a beautiful and massive church.
3. I think that one challenge to the Byzantine Empire was that throughout much of the middle Ages the Byzantium Empire fought the Muslims for control of the eastern Mediterranean. Another challenge was constantly being worried about being overthrown. Another challenge was the riots in the streets which almost made Justinian leave.
4. The economy of the Byzantine Empire was focused mainly around grain which was the “imperial breadbasket” of the empire. This allowed farmers to get rich and for the Empire to gain higher taxes through the farmers. People in the Byzantine Empire were treated fairly well. There were lots of public works, it was a city of baths, and people lived comfortably.
5. There were a few main differences between East and West Christians. The Western Christians had a Latin language while the Eastern Christians had a Greek language. One big difference was that the Western Christians had the pope as their leader while the Eastern Christians had a political leader who was more powerful. Another difference was that the Western Christian priests could not marry while the Eastern priests were able to.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam Ii Review Sheet

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. How do risk-based deposit insurance premiums and risk-based capital requirements help reduce the moral hazard problem of deposit insurance? (Hint: Moral hazard means that because of deposit insurance, banks may take on excessive amounts of risk.)…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Problems facing Byzantine Empire (600s-1100) - the Empire lost a lot of territory from expensive wars, which put them at an economic and territorial disadvantage. As a result of this, they had constant pressure from militaries from the north and south, preventing any advances from occurring.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 9 study guide

    • 1290 Words
    • 8 Pages

    6. In the seventh century, the Byzantines experienced an economic transformation similar to, though less pronounced than, that of western Europe. This was caused by all of the following except…

    • 1290 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Global 1 Review Sheet

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * The laws were the same for all citizens but the punishment were different depending on what social class you belonged to.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The relative political stability, the general prosperity, the use of standardized coins, and the availability of good trade routes helped expand long distance trade. As trade grew, the regions of the Persian empires all contributed particular products to the larger imperial economy.…

    • 2839 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As shown in document 5, Justinian built the Hippodrome which was modeled after The Circus Maximus. Justinian started restoring the Roman Empire by trying to conquer the land that first belonged to the eastern Roman Empire. He gained back southern Spain, all of Italy, and northern Africa. Once he started gaining all this land he had to start to find a way the gain back all the money he spent on conquering land. As shown in document 6, The Byzantine Empire reached its greatest size under Justinian. Because of the location the Constantinople, Justinian had a great advantage because it was right in the center of two cross roads between Asia and Europe, so the empire gained a lot of money in trade because if its location. Because of all these advantages of Constantinople, it was known as the center of…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Similar to china, emperor ordained by god, head of church and state, practiced lay investiture, women held imperial throne (exe Empress Theodora and Zoe), byzantine bureaucrats recruited from all classes, recruited troops, empire depended on Constantinople…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justinian’s accomplishments were like those of Trajan and his personality was like Neros’. Trajan was a clever man who created programs for public work and child welfare. Trajan also built multiple new bridges, harbors, and aqueducts. However, Nero was the opposite he was a selfish liar who did not care how his decisions affected his people and “Justinian was…crafty, hypocritical, secretive by temperament, two-faced: a clever fellow who created countless cities which did not exist before with marvelous ability to conceal his real opinion… lying all the time…”(Documents 1&2). Justinian was an emperor with flaws like Nero he was a selfish liar who spent countless amounts of money building the Hagia Sophia without considering the consequences, but at the same time like Trajan he was clever, crafty and was able to build multiple new cities that benefited the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A&P I Review

    • 12196 Words
    • 49 Pages

    | The branch of science that deals with the structure of human body parts is called anatomy.…

    • 12196 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently a man named John Cohn from T.E.C. (Time Exploration and Co.) took a trip in time back to the Black Sea in 335 CE, home of the Byzantine Empire. He had a lot to say about his trip and about the time period he was lucky enough to witness. Cohn states that the Byzantine Empire was a continuation of the Roman Empire, and began around 330 CE. Here is some more of what he said during our interview: “The Empire was generally concentrated around the Mediterranean and Black Seas. The time when the Byzantine Empire started was soon after Emperor Constantine took over. Constantine was a very important man in the history of the Empire, and reigned from around 306 CE to 337 CE. In 330 Constantine found the city of Byzantium, which was later renamed…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Byzantine Empire was basically the continuation of the Eastern part of the Roman Empire after the Western side collapsed. This civilization took everything from the Roman Empire to include traditions, institutions, and even called themselves “Romans” Which was located at Constantinople.it must be noted that this Empire continued its run for about a millennium, but would fall in 1453 after Constantinople was attack by the Ottoman Empire and conquered. However, before this collapsed, one might wonder how this civilization survive for this long and what were they most important achievements? In this paper I will try my best to answer these questions and shed a brighter light on this civilization known as the “Byzantium”.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He tells his audience that Justinian is a ruthless leader, “who was far too ready to listen to false accusations and quick to inflict punishment”. Through Procopius’ biased opinion of Justinian, we see not the great Emperor, but an almost demonic character, one that comes from peasant parents of barbarian descent. However, Procopius describes Justinian as “extremely simple with no more sense than a donkey, ready to follow anyone who pulls its rein, waving its ears all the time”. Definitely not the kind of character you would expect to find as an elite of the Byzantine Empire, let alone it’s Emperor. He continues on to tell his audience that if you added up all the calamities which had happened to the Romans for all time, and you weighed them against those with which Justinian was responsible, you would find that “a greater slaughter of human beings was brought about by this one man than took place in all the preceding centuries”. Procopius wanted his audience to know that Justinian was a corrupt tyrant. He committed many horrible evil deeds against humankind, from sweeping away established customs, looting households of wealthy people, to the murder of “thousands of thousands of…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1.05 World History

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When the Roman Empire was declining, the emperor decided to divide the empire in half because he thought that it would make it…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justinian Plague Analysis

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Plague of Justinian is said to have contributed to the fall of the Byzantine Empire; it may not have directly led to the empire’s downfall, but the effects were profound. There were extreme shortages of manpower, which caused famine due to the death of farmers. The taxpayer base was greatly depleted, and the empire was highly reliant on tax money.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harris states, “…it was a trade that was carried on by others.” In the source from the past, Spanish rabbi Benjamin also agreed that trade was carried on by others, for example, the merchants that traveled to Constantinople to sell their goods. They were amazed at the large quantity of the items at Constantinople. Harris’ says, “Foreigners were astonished by the opulence that they saw around them in Constantinople, especially the abundance of precious metals, jewels, and silk.” Both sources also agree Constantinople’s geographical location gave it a benefit in the importing and exporting of goods. Another similarity between the scholarly source and the Source from the Past is both sources agree that meat, wine, and bread were plentiful commodities to everyone in Constantinople before the city began to increase in population and after aqueducts were created. In both sources, it was understood that Constantinople was the wealthiest city in the world. The wealth, trade, food, people, and clothing were important to Constantinople because they all helped to keep the city flourishing and…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics