Ap Language Rhetorical Analysis
The author creates a sense of urgency with very brutish words. Her method of writing is persuasive and simultaneously evokes sympathy. This passage is very clear in its stated goal and spends the entirety of the essay attempting to convince the reader; this was achieved through various methods beyond the preceding.
Words like “need”, “Make”, “never”, and “must” all imply power and generally go together with forced obligations. For example, you MUST do the dishes or don’t MAKE me hurt you. These are just a few words evoking action which the author uses with similar connotations. The purpose is to make the reader believe there is either force behind her words or some motivation for the reader to understand and join her cause. Lastly, she uses many “we” words like ‘our’ and ‘together’ to connect with the reader. This creates a pathological reason to be influenced by her argument. This stems from the logic a team member is obligated to assist in dire times. …show more content…
Them” mentality and alienating the implied arguer. Using phrases such as “published by our people” draws a greater following. She writes with this tone to induce compassion and reinforce the theme of unity with the underprivileged minorities of the time. Despite using only phrases, she creates a microsimulation of hypotheticals to strengthen her argument “it is … us “(lines 29-39). By stimulating and provoking more writers and hate, she creates a win-win situation for herself. If people support her, she wins, and, if they do not, then the article is further strengthened by predicting the behavior of the opponent. This is an effective tool used in modern times including the current President’s pre-election double-binds. Thus, justifying necessity of her writing is effectively pursued and executed using these
Words like “need”, “Make”, “never”, and “must” all imply power and generally go together with forced obligations. For example, you MUST do the dishes or don’t MAKE me hurt you. These are just a few words evoking action which the author uses with similar connotations. The purpose is to make the reader believe there is either force behind her words or some motivation for the reader to understand and join her cause. Lastly, she uses many “we” words like ‘our’ and ‘together’ to connect with the reader. This creates a pathological reason to be influenced by her argument. This stems from the logic a team member is obligated to assist in dire times. …show more content…
Them” mentality and alienating the implied arguer. Using phrases such as “published by our people” draws a greater following. She writes with this tone to induce compassion and reinforce the theme of unity with the underprivileged minorities of the time. Despite using only phrases, she creates a microsimulation of hypotheticals to strengthen her argument “it is … us “(lines 29-39). By stimulating and provoking more writers and hate, she creates a win-win situation for herself. If people support her, she wins, and, if they do not, then the article is further strengthened by predicting the behavior of the opponent. This is an effective tool used in modern times including the current President’s pre-election double-binds. Thus, justifying necessity of her writing is effectively pursued and executed using these