According to Source E, the author explicitly states that primary sources being more reliable than a secondary source is a mere myth. Historians understand that a text isn’t significant without a reason of why it is so important, whether or not it is a primary source document or not. Because of this, misconceptions occur about why one text can have more influence and power over another text that suggests otherwise. Choosing the best text all depends on knowing what each category is made for. “Primary sources are created for a variety of reasons, and some of those reasons have nothing to do with objectivity” (Barton 3). The author reiterates that personal thoughts or feelings have nothing to do with how noteworthy a text is. Secondary sources might be more accurate than primary sources, and vice
According to Source E, the author explicitly states that primary sources being more reliable than a secondary source is a mere myth. Historians understand that a text isn’t significant without a reason of why it is so important, whether or not it is a primary source document or not. Because of this, misconceptions occur about why one text can have more influence and power over another text that suggests otherwise. Choosing the best text all depends on knowing what each category is made for. “Primary sources are created for a variety of reasons, and some of those reasons have nothing to do with objectivity” (Barton 3). The author reiterates that personal thoughts or feelings have nothing to do with how noteworthy a text is. Secondary sources might be more accurate than primary sources, and vice