To start off, a statement commonly argued was “No taxation without representation.” This basically states that the colonists believed if they did not have representation in the British parliament, they should not be taxed so heavily or at all in this case. Due to this, the colonists revolted. They did not revolt because they were poor and couldn’t …show more content…
But it wasn’t only the British militia placed in the American colonies that treated the colonists unfair, but the King of Great Britain was a tyrant, or an unjust ruler who has absolute power in the parliament. Document 7 states, “ The history of the present king of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations [unlawful seizures]... a prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.” This quote thoroughly explains how the King of Great Britain was a tyrant and unfit for this role in the parliament. Another major incident of unfair treatment of the British to the colonists was the Olive Branch Petition. The Olive Branch Petition was a written document that asked the British to cause peace with the colonists, but the British were stubborn and refused to accept the petition. Document 6 exclaims,” No man was a warmer wisher for a peaceful settlement than myself before the fatal nineteenth of April, 1775 (Battle at Lexington and Concord), but the moment the event of that day was made known, I rejected the hardened, sullen tempered [King of England] forever.” This quote shows how the colonists want to create peace with the British, but since they killed many of their family and friends and shed blood on the colonies, they are slowly losing their