References: American Psychological Association, (2002). APA Ethics Code 2002 (pp.11-13)
References: American Psychological Association, (2002). APA Ethics Code 2002 (pp.11-13)
In the book The Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot. The author tells the story of a women whose cells were used for scientific experiments. The story begins with the main character, Henrietta Lacks, who is going to John Hopkins Hospital to have a lump on her cervix looked at by doctors. Henrietta had been experiencing pain since the birth of her fourth child. She has several theories as to what is causing this pain, such as complications with childbirth or an STD which she may have gotten from her unfaithful husband. Henrietta had been checked out by local doctors but they attributed the lump to syphilis, which lacks already had. John Hopkins was Lacks’ only option due to Jim Crow laws. The doctor that examined Lacks found many things wrong with her including…
This introduced one of the first ethical implications in this experiment which was withholding information to gain consent.The USPHS conducted a screening in search of infected participants. After they had chosen the few hundred men to be apart of the experiments they began to moved forward with the study. The doctors lured these men into the study by saying that they were ill and had "bad blood".It was never explained to them why they were really being chosen for this treatment. In order to ensure the interest of the blacks, they began performing noneffective treatments on them such as giving the mercurial ointment. Also, they even used African American health care workers to mislead patients into compliance. These men endured much pain and were enrolled in various treatments without their consent.The second ethical implication was the withholding of treatment. This was the worst charge that the researchers had committed. Even in (year) when penicillin had become the primary treatment for syphilis, this information was also withheld and men were prevented from getting treatment. Though Alabama passed a law in 1927 requiring the reporting and treatment of diseases, the USPHS failed to do so when it came to tending to these…
1. The Tuskegee study, as it came to be called, did not start out to be either deadly or a deception. State how the project actually began, and describe the events that led to its becoming a “deadly deception.” Initially, The Tuskegee study began when researchers noted a high prevalence of syphilis in the south, with an “epidemic” rated noted in Macon county.…
This is because a human life is valued more than any other subject used in clinical trials. In order to ensure the efficacy and legitimacy of treatment, human subjects are the most accurate compared to animals. Human subjects cultivate concrete information and data necessary for the improvement of medicine and health care as a whole. Baillie, McGeehan, T.M. Garrett, and R.M. Garrett (2013) stated, “…human experimentation is necessary for medical progress. Animal testing is useful, but it cannot provide the final word on either safety or efficacy” (p. 300). On the contrary, this does not excuse the researcher from disregarding a clinical participant’s life and safety. According to Baillie et al. (2013), humans are not objects that are used however the researcher desires (p. 293). Human experimentation, conversely, has a long history of abuse. Many rules and guidelines have been set in place to prevent researchers from taking advantage of human subjects all in the name of “science”. Due to these unfortunate events, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) have been established to protect and oversee the organization and conduction of human experimentation (Baillie et al., 2013). One historical event that led to the development of stringent biomedical experimentation rules and guidelines was the Tuskegee syphilis research experiment (Head, 2012). This experiment was widely acknowledged and is known as…
The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment was started in the early 1930’s and continued on for over 40 years causing a great deal of physical and emotional health problems to thousands of black men and their families in Macon County, Georgia. Beneficence, according to The Belmont Report states, “Research involving human subjects should do no intentional harm, while maximizing possible benefits and minimizing possible harms, both to the individuals involved and to society at large” (National Institute of Health, 1979).…
In 1932, there was a study that was given in Macon County, Alabama by the health department. The study was given to underprivileged African American men who were informed that they have bad blood disease. The health department offered these men health care without being charged to treat their rare blood disorder because by this time this blood disorder was a plague in their county. This study went on for over 40 years by Macon County health department. The health care services were never received by most of the men and the treatments was held back. The Tuskegee syphilis study is one of the most awful immoral human organized studies.…
Respect for persons means that researchers must obtain voluntary informed consent from participants in the study. Informed consent is achieved when participants are given accurate information about the potential risks and treatment options available. In addition, participants should be able to freely choose to begin or stop the study at any time.(1) The Tuskegee study did not fully disclose information to the participants. They told participants they were being treated for bad blood despite the fact that they were specifically studying the effects…
The researchers used the participant’s illiteracy against them. Knowing they did not have the means to question what was being done to them. Where the experiment went awry is that once penicillin was an acceptable means for treating syphilis the men were discouraged from receiving other healthcare except for what was provided by the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. Many people in the years that the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment took place were aware of the atrocities being committed due to the clinical data that was being provided but very few cared. Finally, in the 1970s Peter Buxtun became the whistleblower and the story broke in the Washington Star on July 25,…
Throughout our nation's history, we have taken part in many unethical means of gaining information or knowledge. Some of the more famous cases include, The Milgram Obedience and Authority experiment, The Stanford Prison experiment, and of course the Abu Ghraib scandal involving our own U.S. soldiers. While two of these instances were not intended to cause physical harm, they were all branded unethical due to the extent of not only the physical abuses that took place, but the painful psychological impact it left on those involved.…
The Tuskegee experiment was yet another demonstration of racial inequalities and dehumanization illustrated by a people who believed in racial superiority. The experiment was unethical and demoralizing from the beginning. The analysis was corrupt and unethical for a plethora of reasons. The experiment disregarded several basic principles of the American Sociological Association’s code of ethics. Perhaps the greatest flaw in the experiment was the intended denial of treatment, which, in turn, directly affected the subject’s safety, violating the code of ‘protecting subjects from personal harm’. ‘Respect the subject’s right to privacy and dignity’ is an additional custom in the code of ethics ignored. The researchers clearly could not even…
In conclusion, The Tuskegee Experiments is a scar that will forever remind scientist why we uphold moral and ethical standards. It is astounding that the experiments on a few hundred black men, with untreated syphilis, could go on for so long. Because of the coercion and deception of the test subjects, consent forms were mandatory. It is sad to look back at these experiments and know that nothing was gained that could not have been known through moral means. There is not one single thread of knowledge that humans must ascertain if it means others have to…
In 1932, a study called The Tuskegee Syphilis study had just begun in Macon County, Alabama. The study in the beginning had involved a small group of 600 black men, and throughout the time of the study’s existence those numbers would change by either death of individual or an addition of a new black man added to the study. In the study, of those 600 men, an estimated 400 were purposely left unaware of the fact that syphilis infected them and they were not being treated for the disease. The main hypothesis in the study was the study of the natural course of syphilis in black male, and there were no questions asked if this was the study was ethically the right thing to do. This study would go on for about 40 years, and end in 1972 due to being exposed in an article by the Associated Press. The exposure of the study would lead the US government and the medical world down a path of change, those changes deal with patient’s knowledge of the experiment and ethics involved in human experimentation.…
The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment was a fundamentally unethical research project that began in 1932 and lasted 40 years ("U.S. Public Health Service Syphilis Study at Tuskegee"). In the study, about 600 black men were told that they were being treated for “bad blood,” a colloquial term for syphilis (“U.S. Public Health”). In reality, the men were not being given any treatment and were merely acting as test subjects so that researchers from the U.S. Public Health Service could study the disease (“The Deadly Deception”). The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment clearly violated the ethical principles put forth in 1979 by the Belmont Report. The Belmont Report has three key components to protect the rights of human research participants: beneficence, autonomy, and justice.…
The Tuskegee Experiment is one of the unethical Health Researches done in the United States. The way the research was conducted was against people's civil rights. Totally secretive and without any objectives, procedures or guidance from any government agency. During the time that the project was launched there were very few laws that protected the public from medical malpractice or from plainly negligence. Also the Civil Rights act did not pass until the 1960's.…
I feel that the purpose of this article along with the visual aide of the movie we watched in class, the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment had been purposely obscured for over forty years, as the U.S. public health could not recognize that this study would horrifyingly portray this country as racist in itself. To hinder one group of the U.S. population, to use these innocent men as experiments was morbidly wrong and as the study progressed it was far to late to cease the study and they had to “save face” to be sure their reputation was redeemed. Much of the article depicts how the U.S. Government epically failed, stating that the U.S. Government did something that was deeply, profoundly, morally wrong. During that time period the PHS (Public Health Service) favorably felt and did not accept media’s definition that this experiment was not as morbid as the Nazi Doctors on Jewish Victims during World War II, when in doubt this experiment provided falsifications to 400 men who were deceivingly told that this experiment would cure an illness that was due to their “bad blood”, and to have doctors at that time state, they’ll have no further interest until these men die, this population suffered under the forced consent that eventually they will receive proper treatment unsure of how long it may take.…