Preview

Apollo Villapando Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1377 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Apollo Villapando Case Study
Apollo Villapando Villapando 1
Business 166
Leah Peer
04/04/18
Test #2
1.
A) Sole Proprietorship- A business organization in which one person owns and, often, operates business. General Partnership- A business organization in which two or more owners agree to share the profits of the business but are also jointly and severally liable for its debts.
Limited Partnership- A business organization with two classes of owners. The limited partner invests in the business but may not exercise control over its operation, in return for protection from liability. The general or managing partner assumes full control of the business operation but can
…show more content…
It will be used for filing taxes, obtaining finances, and getting credit cards.
-Annual Fees range from 0-800
-opening the hotel depending on the cost, it can cost up to 4.5 million or more
-maintaining it would be 300,000 possibly more
Total cost could approximately be 5 million or more
2. Fact: Laureen Statte was a guest at the Vacation Inn Express. Checked into the hotel and proceeded to the workout area. She noticed a sign that says “Hotel Not Liable for Any Injuries Incurred During Workouts.” Ms.Statte did some deadweights before mounting the treadmill. Since she was experienced treadmill user, she started off slow then slowly increased her speed. Ms.Statte fell backward shortly after starting the treadmill causing the plate-glass to shatter and severely injured her.
Issue: Was the Hotel liable for Ms.Statte injury? Was there Negligence?
Rules of Law: -Exculpatory Clause: A contract, or a clause in a contract, that releases one of the parties from liability for his or her
…show more content…
-Comparative Negligence: Shared responsibility for the harm that results from negligence.

Analysis: So Ms.Statte claims that it is the fault of the hotel because the treadmill was too close

to the window which the hotel failed to outfit safety windows. The hotel responds by pointing

out the exculpatory clause and by working out in their gym she agreed to the terms. I believe the

guest in this case would be partly responsible for workout since the whole event was

unforeseeable and there was negligence in both parties. From the information that is gathered we

can’t conclude it is just the hotel’s fault. Mrs.Statt could not have been feeling well during the

workout and fell or both parties didn’t know that the treadmill wasn’t working properly. Also the

positioning of the treadmill wasn’t really thought of since this was probably the first incident in

that gym that has ever happened. As a hotel manager I would reimburse Mrs.Statte for her stay

and give her a complimentary stay or two for the inconvenience. The lawsuit could possibly

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    GENERAL PARTNERSHIP: Two or more components/people come together to share a business. Each partner shares responsibility for P&L.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lit 1 Task 1a

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    is a business owned by two or more owners. In General partnerships each partner is fully active in the firm giving input in management and each partner is fully liable for the debts of the business.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    LIT1 Task 1

    • 1514 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Liability – There is unlimited liability in a general partnership. The owners/partners are responsible for all profits and losses. If one partner is unable to pay a debt the other partners will be accountable to pay.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence in this scenario includes the five essential elements of negligence, duty, breach of duty, the breach being the cause of injury, proximate, and the resulting damages (Lucas, 2008). In a case of negligence the individual or company may be held liable not only with negligence but sometimes with trespass, injury, and even mental or emotional harm (Lucas, 2008). However, the law requires these elements are proven in order to recover in a law suit against a torfeasor for negligence (Melvin,…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gm 520 Week 3

    • 2283 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Mr. Margreiter sued the hotel on grounds that the hotel was negligent in not controlling access to elevators and hence to the guests ' rooms. The hotel says Mr. Margreiter was intoxicated and met his fate outside the hotel. Is the hotel liable? [Margreiter v. New Hotel Monteleone 640 F.2d 508 (5th Gr. 1981)]…

    • 2283 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    HCS 567 Week 3

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For business with two or more owners the decision may be to utilize a general or a limited partnership. The general partnership is not dependent on one person for its successes in fact all the partners have a say in how the business runs and functions as per the partnership agreement (Barringer & Ireland, 2010). This type of organization is similar to the sole proprietorship in that the income is noted on the partners’ personal tax returns as the venture files and an informational tax return only (Barringer & Ireland, 2010). The venture also has limited liquidity. Limited partnership is a modified general partnership with the modification being the addition of two different class of partners, general and limited. This venture is used when attempting to…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One very important issue in this case and many civil lawsuits is negligence. Negligence is when there is a failure to use reasonable care which results in injury or damage to another. It also asks who is responsible for one’s injury. In this case, Mrs. McKoy claims her injuries were caused by T & J’s negligent behavior. In order to prove negligence, T & J must be guilty of five elements: duty of due care, breach, factual cause, proximate cause, and damages.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Appellate Court of New York Held that the employees were not negligent in their actions and therefore did not have a duty to Ms. Pelgraf. Additionally, it was determined that there were no wrong or wrongful actions with regards to the incident which caused Ms. Pelgraf’s injuries, to which her case was built upon; “Wrong” being defined in terms of the natural or probable, at least when unintentional. Lastly, negligence is not a tort unless it results in the commission of a wrong, which violates a right; therefore, the law…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Limited Partnership: Composed of one or more general partners who run the business and one or more people who contribute actual cash (special or limited partner). Note: special partner normally limited to the amount they contribute.…

    • 5091 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assumption of Risk

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Intentional ignorance of the conspicuous sign – Maria intentionally ignored the “EMPLOYEES ONLY” sign and entered an area of the store to which customers were not invited. Therefore, if Maria is injured by a dangerous condition within this area, the store can defend against liability for negligence by raising the defense of ASSUMPTION OF RISK.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genera Partnership

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The general partnership or simply partnership is an association of two or more people carrying on a business with the goal of earning a profit.A partnership is viewed as being one and the same as its owners.The standard general partnership is an organization established by individuals to pursue some business activity.Although the law is permissive in relation to the establishment of such enterprise there are particular way in which law impinges controls,not just the operation of partnership,but their very formation and existence.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Limited Partnership – Consists of a general partner and limited partner(s). A limited partner may not actively participate in the management of the firm, but has limited liability. A general partner is a full partner with unlimited liability for the debts of the partnership.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tort law is the rules of liability for harm caused by one person to another or other’s property (Lambiris, 2012). There is a perspective in this case which related to Tort Law. Anastassia Zissis slipped and injured her neck, lower back buttocks and has also suffered headaches and psychological injuries which have effeced her ability to lead a normal life and return to full employment. Howeve it is not caused by one person, it claim that the main reason that Anastassia Zissis slipped is caused by the poor manage and bad system of the McDonald’s. As a result, the company should take the responsibility for her harms.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Factual Summary of Case Australian tourist, Michael McCarthy, suffered a fall and broke his back while riding Sentosa’s MegaZip, which is a flying fox adventure ride run by Flying Dragon Adventures (FDA). The riders would initially slide down the zipline fast and would be slowed down by a braking mechanism as they approach the landing platform. However, in this case, McCarthy was travelling towards the landing platform at a faster speed than usual. As a result, he crashed onto the platform and broke several vertebrae in his back. He felt incredible pain and could not breathe for a minute and a half. McCarthy had no immediate medical help as there was no medical staff on-site. He only received assistance half an hour later and was taken to Singapore General Hospital 1 hour 15 minutes later. He received 35 stitches to his back and spent 5 days in and out of the intensive care unit. As for the ride, McCarthy satisfied safety requirements of being at least 0.7m tall and less than 140kg in weight. This was the first accident in its two-year history of operation. Before the accident, the ride had been taken by at least 200,000 visitors in total and was already taken by 140 people on that day. Alexander Blyth, managing director of the ride, believed that all safety procedures were followed, that nothing failed and nothing snapped. The ride also requires customers to sign indemnity forms, in which contains an exemption clause that states that they are not responsible for any deaths or personal injuries unless through gross negligence. Blyth reported the case to the Building and Construction Authority (BCA), the regulatory body for amusement rides. Lawyers are attempting to seek compensation for McCarthy’s injuries, as they question the validity of the exclusion clause in the indemnity form by bringing up the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA).…

    • 2491 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    IAS 20

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Limited partnerships are partnerships containing one or more limited partners. Limited partnership must be registered with the Registrar of Companies. Limited partners are not liable for the debts of the partnership with respect to unlimited liability.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays