Preview

Appeasement and World War II

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
667 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Appeasement and World War II
WWII and Appeasement Essay The Second World War was a culmination of conflicts in Europe, which many argue resulted from the First World War itself. After the Treaty of Versailles condemned Germany to a multitude of reparations that needed to be paid, the country’s people were in need of a strong leader, which they soon found in Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party. Hitler started as a mere war veteran but rose in ranks, eventually taking all power over Germany for himself. He started strengthening the army with plans to expand his empire, which he did, starting with the invasion of Czechoslovakia. If Britain and France had joined forces during this invasion, World War II would have likely still taken place. After all, its path had been set in motion by previous events and would probably have remained true to Hitler’s intentions regardless of any intervention. It all started when Britain and France started negotiating with Hitler on the matter of Czechoslovakia and whether its occupants should accept the new German rule of their land. The leader of the Nazi Party eventually convinced both Chamberlain and Daladier, representatives of England and France, respectively, that refusal to cooperate would result in certain war. With no other way out in sight, the two countries retreated, convincing the Czechs that submission was the only safe alternative. At the Munich Agreement, Britain and Germany signed a peace treaty, which resulted in Hitler’s occupation of what would soon be a dismantled Czechoslovakia. Chamberlain returned home, claiming to have secured “peace for our time”. Truthfully, he could not have been more mistaken. As time passed, Hitler continued to strengthen his army and gain more support from the people of Germany, which led to his increasing confidence in his desired expansion of the empire. On the first of September 1939, German forces under Hitler’s command invaded Poland. This event officially marked the beginning of the Second World War


Bibliography: BBC News. BBC, n.d. Web. 21 Oct. 2013. . "Neville Chamberlin on "Appeasement" (1939)." Neville Chamberlin on "Appeasement" (1939). N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Oct. 2013. . "World War II." History.com. A&E Television Networks, n.d. Web. 21 Oct. 2013. .
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    How Did Hilter Attack Poland
    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did Hilter Attack Poland

    September 1st, 1939, Germany invades Poland. Adolf Hilter gave the order to attack Poland by air and land. The air attacks included bombing Polish airfields and at sea the Germans used U-boats and warships to attack the naval forces in Poland. The land attacks had many armed forces coming into Poland and destroying the rest. “I have issued the command and I'll have anybody who utters but one word of criticism executed by firing squad–that our war aim does not consist in reaching certain lines, but in the physical destruction of the enemy. Accordingly, I have placed my death-head formations in readiness—for the present only in the East— with orders to send to death mercilessly and without compassion, men, women, and children of Polish derivation and language. Only thus shall we gain the living space that we need.” Hilter stated this quote the night before the invasion. The invasion became known as part of Hitler's “blitzkrieg” strategy to take over land and expanded Germany rule. Once the Germans invaded Poland, Hilter set up concentration camps based on religion, race, and politics. When Britain and France heard this news of the invasion in Poland, they declared war on September 4th, 1939 because Hilter broke the Munich…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Techniques Used In Arthur Neville Chamberlain's Speech
    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rhetorical Techniques Used In Arthur Neville Chamberlain's Speech

    Arthur Neville Chamberlain was a British politician who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1937 - 1940. He signed the Munich Agreement in 1938. When Hitler continued his aggression on Poland, Chamberlain promised to defend Poland's independence, therefore Britain declared war on, and Chamberlain led Britain through the first eight months of World War II. “On the Nazi invasion of Poland” speech was announced hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. He died of cancer after six months of leaving the premiership and was replaced by Winston Churchill. This speech was announced to show the cruelty of the Nazi government and to stop the Germans aggression…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    General Macarthur: The Most Impactful Army Leader In World War II
    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages

    General Macarthur: The Most Impactful Army Leader In World War II

    The Treaty of Versailles marked the end of World War I in 1919. Germany and their allies were blamed for WWI. Because Germany was blamed for sparking the war, they had their military restricted to 100,000 men, had to pay reparations, lost their Pacific and African colonies, and the Rhineland was turned into a demilitarized zone. In the 1920s, Adolf Hitler became the leader of the Nazi Party in Germany and began rising in power. He became the Fuhrer in 1934.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Asses the View That Appeasement Was the Only Realistic Option for Chamberlain in 1938
    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Asses the View That Appeasement Was the Only Realistic Option for Chamberlain in 1938

    Churchill, a very strong opponent of appeasement, notoriously said “An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last”[1]. However it wasn’t till the late 1960s that official Government documents on the subject were publically released which created a new view on Chamberlain and appeasement and that it was the only realistic policy for Chamberlain and Britain to pursue.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact Essay
    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact Essay

    In 1939, Adolf Hitler was get ready for war. While he was planning to procure Poland without constrain (as he had attached Austria the prior year), Hitler needed to keep the likelihood of a two front war. Hitler understood that…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Assess the View That Appeasement Was the Only Realistic Option for British Policy Towards Germany Between 1936 and 1938
    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Assess the View That Appeasement Was the Only Realistic Option for British Policy Towards Germany Between 1936 and 1938

    The erosion of Neville Chamberlain’s# reputation was brought about quickly as his policy of appeasement failed to prevent WW2. The Cato# collective branded him as a criminal in the ‘Guilty men’#. Churchill# further reinforced this view telling the commons “England has been offered a choice between war and shame. She has chosen shame, and will get war.”#. These more orthodox views starkly contrast the reactions of the public and media pre-war. Hailed as a hero “Most newspapers supported Chamberlain uncritically, and he received thousands of gifts, from a silver dinner service to many of his trademark umbrellas.”#, with newspapers such as the Stockholm Tidningen# suggesting he receive the Nobel peace prize, Strasbourg renaming her streets overnight and the Telegram# concluding "Your name will go down in history as a statesman who saved civilisation from destruction”#. Ultimately appeasement, “the reduction of tensions between two states by the methodical removal of the principal causes of conflict and disagreement between them, which might otherwise lead to war.”# may not have been the only realistic option, but it was certainly an option and it was taken forward. Used as a synonym for weakness and ‘giving in’ in today’s world, there are Historians who argue that Chamberlain and his policy of appeasement was weak and lead to WW2 such as L.B. Namier, while there are also historians, such as A.J.P Taylor, who argue it was the only realistic option for him, during the years 1936-38.…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The a-Bomb: Planned, or a Reaction?
    • 2349 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The a-Bomb: Planned, or a Reaction?

    World War II began with the German Invasion of Poland on September 1st, 1939. Two days after the invasion, the United Kingdom and France declared war on Nazi Germany and fascist Italy. Two months prior…

    • 2349 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Annotated Bibliography: The Pathway To The Modern World
    • 2536 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Annotated Bibliography: The Pathway To The Modern World

    After World War I created instability with in Europe the stage was being set for another world war that would follow a mere two decades later. Germany was both unstable politically and economically and with the help of Hitler they were determined to get back on their feet. Hitler began rearming the country and signed strategic treaties with Italy and Japan in order to gain more ground on his goal of world domination. Hitler invaded Poland in September of 1939 and as a result Great Britain and France were inclined to declared war on Germany. World War II…

    • 2536 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Did Wwii Begin?
    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Did Wwii Begin?

    As for France and Great Britain, not wanting to repeat the huge losses they experienced in World War I, they decided not to attempt stopping Hitler from taking over Czechoslovakia and Austria. After Germany realized what they could get done, September 1, 1939, they decided to go ahead and take over Poland as well. After France and Great Britain saw that Hitler/Germany wasn't going to stop after that, they gave Germany the option of war.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    was appeasement right or wrong
    • 2172 Words
    • 7 Pages

    was appeasement right or wrong

    Appeasement was the right policy for England in 1938. This is because It was based on the idea that what Hitler wanted was reasonable and, when his reasonable demands had been satisfied, he would stop. Appeasement was the only practical action that could be held during that time. England and France were not ready to get into another war. They already had severe damages that they couldn’t afford to get into another war. This gave them time to prepare for war since it is inevitable anyways. It also gave them time to prepare for old and broken equipment. Alliances needed to be made and through this, that was all possible. Also, through this policy, they were able to get public support. Appeasement also allowed Britain time to retool factories for war. Many Britons during that time saw Hitler as a defence against Russian Communism. This all happened because they thought that Hitler would soon be satisfied after remilitarizing the Rhineland, annexation of Austria and czechoslovakia. Wanted to please Hitler this way. The empire was already overstretched and its financial resources quite limited. The U.S. was isolationist. Soviet communism was feared, France was weak. This was all done to prevent war and preventing war is something needed to be done. Their objective was for the collaboration of all nations in building up a lasting peace for Europe. The Czechs, left themselves and told they were going to get no help from the Western Powers, would have been able to make better terms than they have got. This also gave the greatest chance of securing protection for the country. Czechoslovak State would’ve not been able to be an independent entity without this. Chamberlain remembered the slaughter of the…

    • 2172 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    US Involvement In World War II
    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    US Involvement In World War II

    World War II started as an act of hatred directed towards the Jewish people. Since the leader of Nazi Germany, Adolf Hitler, blamed them for Germany’s loss during World War I and for the economic crisis they were having. Hitler invaded Poland on September 1, 1939 and claimed he did this for Lebensraum Living space for German people even though it was because he wanted to kill Jewish people. After this mistake, war was declared on Nazi Germany and the Axis powers to win what was considered, the war to end all wars.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Us and Wwii
    • 2265 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Us and Wwii

    - Neville Chamberland believed that Hitler was rational and could be negotiated with > the munich conference 1938…

    • 2265 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was and Appeasement a Mistake
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Was and Appeasement a Mistake

    Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler shook hands at the Munich Conference in 1938. This resulted in the pact, signed Sept. 29th, which recognized the German annexation of the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia in return for a promise that there would be no further aggression. This policy of appeasement failed to prevent the outbreak of World War II.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was Appeasement Justified
    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Was Appeasement Justified

    An argument for appeasement is that Germany deserved to have a better deal as The Treaty of Versailles, many British people thought, was too harsh. If Germany would have some of the clauses of the treaty rescinded, then maybe they will be happy and not cause a war. Moreover Britain had lost and reduced a lot of its army during and after WW1. This meant that even though Chamberlain didn’t like to avoid war at any cost, he soon realized that Germany had been rearming its army for quite a while. Consequently it would be ludicrous to go to war with such a small army, therefore in the mean time it was better to appease Hitler. Britain slowly started to rearm its army, each year investing more. Reasoning for this is that if you spend all your money too soon you may end up with outdated weapons, which are useless against a modern army. Also numerous people feared a second world war, as WW1 was very bad for the citizens on Great Britain, especially as it may be over a small country such as Czechoslovakia. Many people would do anything to avoid a war as bad as WW1, this is why it was sensible to appease, as the public opinion was against war. Additionally many wealthy people, and ordinary people, would lose their land, property and their money if a communist government took over the country. The majority thought that communism was much worse than Hitler, as Adolf was seen as a strong…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was the appeasement policy an error?
    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Was the appeasement policy an error?

    In the 1930s, Britain and France adopted the appeasement policy towards Germany. It was to give in to some of the demands of Hitler in the hope that they would be satisfied and not ask for more. The appeasement policy aimed to prevent another large-scale war like the World War I.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics