Preview

Appellate Brief Example

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5428 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Appellate Brief Example
LEJ
2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
F

A^

SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 1051361

BARBARA MORRI S N ,
Plaintiff /Appellant versus PATRICIA T. SPIVEY ET AL,
Defendants/Appellees

1

Appeal from the Circuit Court of
Henry County , Alabama

1
BRIEF ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT , BARB RA ISON

Submitted by.

. .... . ORIGINAL t Appellant

Bar

Russell Lee I y
Albert H. Ada s, Jr.
Attorneys for Plaintiff /

ara
Morrison
Post Office ox 910
Eufaula, AL 36072-0910
TEL: (334) 87-6672
FAX: (334) 687-6671

NO ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 1051361

BARBARA MORRISON,
Plaintiff/Appellant
versus

PATRICIA T. SPIVEY ET AL,
Defendants/Appellees

t
Appeal from the Circuit Court of
Henry County, Alabama

BRIEF ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, BARBARA MORRISON

Submitted by:
Russell Lee Irby
Albert H. Adams, Jr.
Attorneys for Plaintiff/
Appellant Barbara Morrison
Post Office Box 910
Eufaula, AL 36072-0910
TEL: (334) 687-6672
FAX: (334) 687-6671
NO ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE

Table of Contents
Statement Regarding Jurisdiction

ii

Table of Authorities

iii,iv

Statement of the Case

1

Issues Presented for Review

3

Statement of the Facts

4

Standard of Review

8

Summary of the Argument

9

Argument

10

Conclusion

22

Certificate of Service

23

1

STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

This Court has jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to the

1
1
1

Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a), as the trial court's order granting the appellee's Motion for Summary
Judgment is immediately appealable. Summary judgment was granted on May 26, 2006. Appellant Barbara Morrison timely filed her appeal on June 16, 2006 within forty-two (42) days of trial court' s order.

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

ii

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
(PAGE)
Newman v. Cole, 872 So.2d 138 (Ala 2003)

1
1
1
1

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Case Brief No 1

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff and Defendant: The plaintiff/appellant is Harvestons Securities, Inc. The defendant/appellee is Narnia Investments, Ltd.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Brief

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr. Potbelly holds a garage sale at his home. Mr. Slim Jim stops by the sale and upon noticing a rare piece of art pottery offers a price of $100 for the art that is marked $250. Mr. Potbelly accepts Mr. Slim Jim’s offer. Mr. Potbelly informs Mr. Slim Jim he is selling his home because he is moving up north because he has lost his job. Mr. Slim Jim asks how much he is selling it for and Mr. Potbelly informs him he is thinking $75,000. Mr. Slim Jim offers him $70,000 cash for the property which Mr. Potbelly immediately accepts the offer. Mr. Slim Jim informs Mr. Potbelly that he will be back in one hour with a cashiers’ check made payable to Mr. Potbelly. Mr. Potbelly says “Great!” and that while Mr. Slim Jim is getting the money that he will find a box in his basement for the pottery.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Joseph Kly met Walter and Helen Pestinikas in the latter part of 1981 when Kly consulted them about prearranging his funeral. In March, 1982, Kly, who had been living with a stepson, was hospitalized and diagnosed as suffering from Zenker's diverticulum, a weakness in the walls of the esophagus, [***4] which caused him to have trouble swallowing food. In the hospital, Kly was given food which he was able to swallow and, as a result, regained some of the [**1342] weight which he had lost. When he was about to be discharged, he expressed a desire not to return to his stepson's home and sent word to appellants that he wanted to speak with them. As a consequence, arrangements were made for appellants to care for Kly in their home on Main Street in Scranton, Lackawanna County.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & Birney, David A. Frenznick and Anthony J. DeCristoforo, for Defendant Robert Del Pero.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Photosynthesis first must be determined by plotting O2 evolution vs time at different light levels. The rates calculated from each O2 evolution curve are then plotted against light level. [ For example, the figure below shows O2 evolution curves when photosynthesis was allowed to occur in the presence of two different light…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case brief

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issues: 1) Whether the district court erred in concluding that hay is not a “product “for purposes of a strict liability in tort cause of action. 2) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings negligence claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses, thus no duty of care existed. 3) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings’ breach of contract claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses. 4) Whether the District Court erred in imposing discovery sanctions against the Rothings. 5) Whether the District Court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to Kallestad and denying the Rothings a hearing in respect to the calculation of attorney’s fees. (₱3-7)…

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Appellate Court’s decision was that the defendant(s) were not entitled to use the self-defense defense.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Brief

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the evening of January 5, 1993, Tracie Reeves and Molly Coffman, both twelve years of age and students at West Carroll Middle School, spoke on the telephone and decided to kill their homeroom teacher, Janice Geiger. They agreed that Coffman would bring rat poison to school the following days so that it could be placed in Geiger 's drink. After that , they would steal Geiger 's car and drive to the Smoky Mountains. On the morning of January 6, Coffman placed a packet of rat poison in her purse and board the school bus. Coffman told another student, Christy Hernandez, of the plan and show her the poison. Hernandez went and informed her homeroom teacher, Sherry Cockrill. Cockrill then informed the school principal, Claudia Argo. When Geiger entered her classroom that morning, she observed Reeves and Coffman leaning over her deck; and when the girls noticed her, they giggled and ran back to their seats. Geiger saw a purse lying next to her coffee cup on the top of the desk. Shortly after Argo called Coffman to the principal 's office, rat poison was found in Coffman 's purse. Both Reeves and Coffman gave written statement to the Sheriff investigator concerning their plan to poison Geiger and steal her car.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief Memorandum

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plaintiff, Elian Gonzalez, a six year old minor, through his “next of friend”, Lazaro Gonzalez, filed an asylum application with the INS (Immigration & Naturalization Service), which was denied. The plaintiff’s then filed a claim in the federal district court which stated the Plaintiff’s due process rights were violated and the INS had overstepped their power in interpreting the statute, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1158 . The Court determined the Plaintiff’s rights had not been violated nor had the INS misused their power and the ruling of the INS was valid. Plaintiff then filed appeal to the Federal Appellate Court.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Brief

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This civil court case takes place in a West Virginia school system located in Taylor County, when a general education high school history teacher failed to follow an IEP for Douglas Devart. During the case Devart and his parents Robert and Virginia ended up using aliases by the names of John Doe, Jane Doe and son D.D. Doe as a deterrent from the public so the family would not endure any additional embarrassment, slander, and/or liable regarding the son’s handicap. The defendants of this case were D.D.’s history teacher Michael Withers, Principal Greg Cartwright, Superintendent Wendell Teets and the Taylor County Board of Education. The following is a sequence of events that happened in chronological order that led up to the trial. Plaintiff D. D. was diagnosed as having a learning disability in the fourth grade while attending Anna Jarvis School in Taylor County. At that time he had been put on an Individual Educational Program (a.k.a. IEP) designed to accommodate his learning disability as required by Public Law 94-142 and implementing federal regulations, 34 C.F.R. 300.130 and implementing State Policy No. 2419, Section 1.3, 1.4 and 2.11, because of his learning disability D.D.’s educational program was adapted to provide oral testing by a learning disabilities teacher in a learning disabilities resource classroom. This accommodation was regularly provided at Anna Jarvis School and Grafton Middle School.…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Applications for asylum may not be made against the wishes of a parent of a child that lacks the mental capacity to request asylum and a third party cannot speak on behalf of a minor because it is the right of a…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case brief

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS: In August of 2003 Detective Shane Blankenship, a social worker, was assigned to investigate and interview Michael Shatzer about claims that Shatzer had sexually abused his three year old son. At the time of the investigation Shatzer was incarcerated at Maryland Correctional Institution-Hagerstown for an unrelated child-sexual abuse offense. Before asking Shatzer any questions, Detective Blankenship informed Shatzer of his rights, Shatzer then obtained a written waiver of those rights. Blankenship proceeded to end the interview, release Shatzer back into the general prison population, and end the investigation. After two years and six months, Dectective Hoover reopened the investigation, interviewed Shatzer's son who was now eight years old, who could now describe the incident in more detail. In March of 2006, Hoover went to Roxbury Correctional Institute to interview Shatzer about sexually abusing his son. After approximately 30 minutes of interviewing, Shatzer agreed to take a polygraph; in which he failed. At no point during this second interview did Shatzer request to speak to a lawyer or refuse to answer Hoover's questions without a lawyer present. After incriminating himself, Shatzer was charged with second-degree sexual offense, sexual child abuse, second-degree assault and contributing to conditions rending a child in need of assistance. In court, Shatzer moved to suppress his March 2006 statements in regards to Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981). The trail court denied his motion. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Maryland reversed the trail courts decision stating that release of Shatzer back into the general prison population did not constitute a break in custody.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Specifically, Maddox asserted that his right to due process was violated as outlined in violation of the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland by the state 's failure to disclose a photograph taken by the police shortly after the alleged rape showing Elder 's bed neatly made, the results of a police examination of the bedspread which revealed no blood, semen or other fluid, and lastly a written statement by another witness, Brenda Phelps, that Debbie Phillips had stated that she dropped her insurance with Maddox for financial reasons. Maddox appeals the denial of habeas relief.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    403 U.S. 217; 91 S. Ct. 1940; 29 L. Ed. 2d 438; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 27…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics