In a letter from a logical thinker, “the greatest scientist” of the twentieth century, and a noble prize winner, Albert Einstein, to a young student, the most imperious characteristic is Einstein’s objectivity. Einstein takes a logical approach to the ideas of prayer, but clarifies the obscure reasoning by differentiating prayer, faith, and religion in a research scientist’s point of view to give an idea of a research scientist’s approach to the subject of prayer.…
Albert Einstein made the correct decision to warn President Roosevelt about the dangers of atomic weapons. In 1939, Albert Einstein was convinced by a group of refugee scientists to write a letter to President Roosevelt in order to explain the dangers of atomic bombs. During this time, World War II caused fear amongst the country. People were afraid that Adolf Hitler would compose an atomic bomb and it would cause destruction all over the country. This is the reason behind the scientists wanting Albert Einstein to write his letter to Franklin D. Roosevelt.…
Albert Einstein considered the greatest scientist of the 20th century hopes to accurately respond to Phyllis’s letter that asked him whether scientists prayed and if they did what did they pray about. Einstein’s response is rhetorically accurate in the fact that he lets Phyllis know the answer to her question in an understandable manner and is not abrupt. Einstein’s audience is a sixth-grade student so he answered his question by saying “no” in a kind way. The writer Einstein uses pathos and logos to allow his point to clearly shine; he also uses simplistic diction to recreate his audiences understanding.…
Eventhough, science provided to our society enormous knowledge about the universe and the possibilities how to use matter and energy, which lead to the mass production of superhuman technology, science has not been always appreciated by the humans. Religious communities abused the scientific individuals and theories throughout the European modern history. Ideas, that are known to be fact nowadays, like heliocentrism, dissemination of the diseases by germs, or the shape of the Earth were rejected by the society, because of the massive power of the Church. Hence, the religious impact on the educational system in the 20th century, after the breakthroughs of Newton or Einstein, portrays the humanity as a stubborn, ignorant, and intolerant civilization. The fact, that there is a countless number of churches in the United States, but the budget for NASA decreases almost every year, proves that our society is not ready to get on a higher and more intelligent level. Therefore, I suggest that our society finally acknowledges the most famous quote from Nietzsche: “God is…
Religious authority typically rejected scientific ideas. In Document 12, Gottfried Leibniz stated in his book that he believed God “governs minds as a Prince governs his subjects”. The ideas that God puts forth in the Bible are that of truth—despite the science that strenuously prove it incorrect. Scientists had to keep their scientific studies and experiments secretive because much of what they proved contradicted Church teachings. In Document 1, Nicolaus Copernicus speaks to Pope Paul III in his 1543 book, On the Revolution of the Heavenly Spheres, asking for his support of the sciences, and telling him that the…
As scientists, or natural philosophers, made new discoveries and theories they often dedicated them to the church, whether it was literal dedication or whether the finding supported the church. Even though they meant to support the church, many of those who did not understand the findings rejected them, but the fact that the common man could not always understand what an astronomer had investigated does not mean that it should be rejected. For the beauty and usefulness of the discoveries support what the common man knows and understands which is that God is God. (Doc. 2) The pressure that came from being rejected pushed scientists to search for acceptance in many cases for fear of being outcast, and there was no greater place to search for acceptance than from the church. Nicolaus Copernicus, Polish priest and astronomer, dedicated his works to Pope Paul III stating how he was not one to shrink from another’s criticism and that his findings contribute to the well being of the Church. (Doc. 1) Copernicus was a man of the church as well, making his words to the Pope weighted, however. Natural philosophers used the church as evidence in their findings as well. Once atoms and the structure of the world were discovered, it was too mind-blowing to not believe that all this perfect complexity was not brought together by an all-powerful being. But seeing that most men during this time were in some way affiliated with the church, it was very common for men to make these sorts of assumptions. (Doc. 8) Religion thus gave scientists a reason for discovery and evidence supporting discoveries.…
At the time before the letter was sent, America was so convinced a atom bomb was impossible, that they didn’t even have a committee dedicated to nuclear research. In Einstein's letter to president roosevelt, he specifically said “and put forward recommendations…
In his Letter to Grand Duchess Christiana, Galileo made an attempt to explain his discoveries and defended that they do not discredit the Church or religion. He insisted that science and religion could coexist. He explained how and why. He expressed his personal opinion on the reasons why certain people did not believe him and his discoveries. Galileo expressed confidence in his knowledge, sarcasm in some regards, and the letter’s overall tone seemed to upset many.…
The letter written to Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States, from Albert Einstein, a famous scientist in the early 1900s, explains how an element named Uranium can benefit America greatly. In this letter, Einstein informs the president on how and why it would be very beneficial towards manufacturing areas in the US. Einstein then lists ways Uranium can be used to help the US scientifically and politically. An example that Einstein includes in his letter to Roosevelt, is the fact that uranium can be used to make explosives for war, especially since World War II happens very soon later in the year this letter was written. Albert Einstein brought this topic to the President’s attention mainly because of the fact there is a…
At the outset of the nineteenth century in Britain, religious faith and the study of the sciences tended to exist in harmony with each other. The study of God’s Word, in the Bible, and His Works, in nature, were assumed to be two versions of the same ultimate truth.1 When William Paley published Natural Theology; or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity in 1802, he reinforced the concept of a designing God after positing that natural objects show evidence of design, emphasizing nature as God’s creation.2…
In a letter that Albert Einstein writes, he uses ethos and logos to effectively answer Phyllis Wright’s question on whether scientists pray. In order to achieve this, Einstein first utilizes ethos to give credibility to the answer. He explicitly states that the response is his own opinion by saying “my answer” in the first sentence. This man is considered to be the greatest scientist of the twentieth century and if it is his answer, Wright will be convinced with his response. Also, Wright specifically wrote to him and so when he responds personally, Wright will trust the response because she respects Einstein enough to write to him. Additionally, Einstein successfully employs logos to assist in his purpose to answer the question. For example,…
Albert Einstein states in the letter “everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe” By saying this he gives off the idea that he has became open to the opinion of others, without clearly stating that he believes either way. He isn’t trying to disprove a religious spirit exists, but solely trying to show a difference between religious spirit and science.…
January 24, 1936 Phyllis Wright, a sixth grade student, asked the question to Albert Einstein “whether scientists pray, and if so, what they pray for.” Einstein’s response to the students question was rhetorically effective. He managed to answer he question without giving her a direct answer. He went in-depth to explained the scientific response to pray. He started off by making it sound like he did not pray but by the second paragraph he stated reasons that would make readers assume he does pray and that there is a God; however, by the third paragraph readers could make an easier assumption if he prayed or not.…
Einstein did a good job establishing his subject, or the purpose, in this letter. He made it very clear that he was explaining whether or not scientists pray. Due to the fact that this letter was written to a sixth grade girl, Einstein chose an appropriate tone for his audience; Einstein made his answer obvious a concise so that Phyllis’s question was answered. “For this reason, a research scientist will hardly be inclined to believe that events could be influenced by prayer, i.e., by a wish addressed to a supernatural being” (Einstein 10).…
Brian Cox: That's a wonderfully provocative sentence, actually. A beautiful answer. It's interesting, because you have previously used the word God in a similar way, in my view, to Einstein. I am thinking of phrases like "knowing the mind of God", which you used in A Brief History Of Time. In my opinion, Einstein was using the word God as a shorthand to convey the majesty and beauty of the laws of physics, and did not intend this to be taken as a sign that he subscribed to a particular religious doctrine. Is this the sense in which you have used the term before, and are you trying to clear up any misunderstandings caused by your previous use of the word "God", or have I read too much into your answer?…