Preview

approaches to evaluating a document or source

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
532 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
approaches to evaluating a document or source
Approaches to Evaluating a Document or Source

Author John Tosh outlines in his book ‘The Pursuit of History’ two approaches to evaluating a document or source. These are namely an External Criticism and an Internal Criticism (Tosh, 1984. 58)

The Oxford School Dictionary defined a criticism as the expression of disapproval of something on the basis of perceived faults or mistakes. (Oxfords School Dictionary, 2003. 109) By applying this these criticisms to any historical source or potential source a historian can identify whether or not the source is worthy of use.

An external criticism is one that firstly tests a sources authenticity, it questions the origins, date, author and other key factors against what is already known and proven of the time in question. This process can identify any discrepancies or forgeries, yet the source should not be discarded. Some of the most famous sources in history have questionable authenticity such as the Bixby Letter whose author is widely debated (Abraham Lincolns Most Notorious Forgers, n.d*). By establishing a sources’ credibility the historian can determine the weight it holds or the reasoning behind such falsified documentation, then seek to question the motives of the forger. (Tosh, 1984. 62) This method in itself holds some problems, as a document could be externally sound but the content can be tainted.

Thus an Internal criticism must be applied. This is analysis of the content itself. A historian must account for a larger variety of factors that led to the creation of the document. Whether the author was a first hand witness, the mind-state of the author, take into account prejudices, bias, suppression, political influences, intentions and self-interests. This approach deals directly with the subject matter and delves into its complexity. (Kent, 1941. 67) An example is the Han Emperors of China from 206 BC who took interest in history and thus developed a branch of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The author’s analysis on the documents that are presented in the text about Captain John Smith changed my mind on how historical documents need to be analyzed. The author talks about how Captain John Smith wrote down all of his observations in 3rd person which makes it very confusing as a reader to analyze what he is trying to say especially with the archaic dialect of the time. I agree with the author’s analysis of the documents and I also agree with him because after reading the historical document myself I was rather confused about the events that occurred in the historical…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although events in history occurred over a long span of time and development, history first became an academic subject a little more than 100 years ago (McNeill 12). Since then, a plethora of controversies appeared regarding how historians, scholars, and intellectuals should examine and analyze history. Among the initial methods of studying history was the scientific research method, or scientific source criticism, which fundamentally extracts valid, legitimate facts from a diverse range of historical sources. Throughout time, however, the facts derived from this method of historical study gradually altered, leading to a new method of historical study: using facts and combining them with opinions and goals to constitute personal interpretations. As Oscar Handlin zealously asserts, historians and scholars should provide a strict examination of history based on a chronological study of known and verifiable facts as opposed to using verifiable facts as the basis for their own interpretation, influenced by their own group, experiences, beliefs, and personal motives. Through implementing a strict examination of history, historians can successfully detect and eradicate bias in their writings, allow the government as well as individuals to gain an insight into the past in order to secure and progress the future, and grasp the magnitude of truth.…

    • 645 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Neo-Aristotelian Criticism, created in 1925, by Hervert A. Wichlen is an analysis that condones the use of the five cannons; invention, organization, style, memory and delivery. To begin with invention, one must describe the external proofs, meaning the context of the speech and background of the speaker and occasion and internal proofs, the affected audience and specific appeals used. Ethos appeal to ethics and morals, pathos, targeting emotions and logos, to engaging facts and logistics. The second foundation is organization, or the structure and arrangement of said artifact. This is looking at why and what manner the rhetor organized context. The third cannon is style, meaning the stylistic device the speaker chose to weave into his speech, such as alliteration, metaphors or allegories or just the style of language the rhetor uses. Next is memory. Has the rhetor memorized some, part or all of his speech? The final cannon is delivery, the actual presentation of the artifact. Examples are…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. What is the significance of this document? What does this source tell us? What does the source reveal about the wider historical context? How does it compare with other sources?…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this review, I summarize the source and analyses what relation it has to the historical subject as well as what the article says about the aspect of history it addresses.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Carefully read the ‘Note for Students’ at the start of the book, paying particular attention to what Edward Countryman says about written history. He says “But good historians always approach the past on its own terms, taking careful stock of the period’s cultural norms and people’s assumptions or expectations, no matter how different from contemporary attitudes.” What point is he making here and do you agree with him?…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Primary sources are called “primary” because they are firsthand records of a past era or historical event. They are the raw materials, or the evidence, on which historians base their “secondary” accounts of the past. A rapidly growing number of history teachers today are using primary sources. Why? Perhaps it's because primary sources give students a better sense of what history is and what historians do. Such sources also help students see the past from a variety of viewpoints. Moreover, primary sources make history vivid and bring it to life. However, primary sources are not easy to use. They can be confusing. They can be biased. They rarely all agree. Primary sources must be interpreted and set in context. To do this, students need historical background knowledge. Debating the Documents helps students handle such challenges by giving them a useful framework for analyzing sources that conflict with one another.…

    • 5809 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howarth use of sources throughout his book is a strong point that he uses. Howarth shows the different perspectives that have been viewed through history. He gives his own insights and tries to show the reader the different view points. History can be taken in many different ways and Howarth gives reasons and evidence to support his claims.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have not an expert on formulating, evaluating, and integrating criticism of written work, but I have master the idea and the format. One of the factor I think is because that the thinking patterns are different from one culture to a different culture and the other factor is that I just do not have enough experience in formulating, evaluating, and integrating criticism of…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    abraham linclion memorial

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2) Analysis - The second step in criticism is to analyze the artwork. Focus on the way the…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Effects of Imperialism

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Directions: The following question is based on the accompanying Documents 1- 13 (The documents have been edited for the purpose of this exercise.) This question is designed to test your ability to work with and understand historical documents. Write an essay that:     Has a relevant thesis and supports that thesis with evidence from the documents. Uses all or all but one of the documents. Analyzes the documents by grouping them in as many appropriate ways as possible. Does not simply summarize the documents individually. Takes into account both the sources of the documents and the author’s points of view.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Four Eras of Writing

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Late- nineteenth-century historians, usually called “historicists” or “positivists” believed that history was like science and with practice it could be solved. According to Couvares, Croce believed that Positivists were faulty in their assumptions because history was perceived differently every time it was written down since no one thinks exactly alike. With so many different views, historians are usually adding more and more information to each other’s perceptions.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paul Laurence Dunbar

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages

    basic charge of this criticism can be stated in the words of a recent critic,…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Faith of A Historian

    • 6315 Words
    • 26 Pages

    This legitimate desire of the historian to interest, to instruct, and to please, is at once a leading motive for his labors, a challenge to present his work in artistic form, and a danger to his professional integrity. It tempts him to deviate from the truth in order to satisfy school committees on whom he depends for "adoptions"; or the prejudices of reviewers and the emotions of the public to whom he looks for circulation. Historians of repute have sold…

    • 6315 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Does the work taken as a whole lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value?…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays