Apush Dbq 3
1. There were diplomatic agreements with Japan because they wanted to keep peace with Japan
2. In Korea, the Taft-Katusura Agreement in 1905—was recognized as Japan’s dominance over Korea
3. There was much need for the U.S. to control the Philippines
4. Although the act, technically violated the Open Door policy, but it was truly necessary
5. There was Japanese resentment through the Open Door policy in China
6. There were many limitations of the Japanese immigrants, and the main issue was the language in schools
7. Russo-Japanese War: Imperialist rivalry between Russia and Japan led to war, Roosevelt had arranged for a diplomatic conference b/w the nations – agree to Treaty of Portsmouth (even though Japan was blamed for the US for not giving the country all they wanted from Russia)
8. Gentlemen’s agreement: caused significant friction between Japan and US-- like developing new discriminatory laws in California-- like segregating schools or even that Japan agreed to limit emigration
1. …show more content…
There was an economic force versus a military force
2. Taft’s policy didn't include any big stick
It only included a mild expansionist policy that was dependent on investor’s dollars more than the navy’s battleships
Their American financial business interests abroad was promoted around the idea of it
3. There was a substitute for the economic ties for the military alliances
4. The American bankers started to replace the Europeans in the Caribbean
5. China, Japan, Russia alienated
6. Taft thought that it was important for him to be involved in investing in China
7. There was success but it was left out of the main agreement in the building
8. Taft causes a rivalry and possible end to open door policy in China
9. The Lodge Corollary to Monroe Doctrine was that the non-European powers, like Japan, would be excluded from owning territory in the Western Hemisphere in response to a group of Japanese investors wanting to buy Mexico’s Baja
2. In Korea, the Taft-Katusura Agreement in 1905—was recognized as Japan’s dominance over Korea
3. There was much need for the U.S. to control the Philippines
4. Although the act, technically violated the Open Door policy, but it was truly necessary
5. There was Japanese resentment through the Open Door policy in China
6. There were many limitations of the Japanese immigrants, and the main issue was the language in schools
7. Russo-Japanese War: Imperialist rivalry between Russia and Japan led to war, Roosevelt had arranged for a diplomatic conference b/w the nations – agree to Treaty of Portsmouth (even though Japan was blamed for the US for not giving the country all they wanted from Russia)
8. Gentlemen’s agreement: caused significant friction between Japan and US-- like developing new discriminatory laws in California-- like segregating schools or even that Japan agreed to limit emigration
1. …show more content…
There was an economic force versus a military force
2. Taft’s policy didn't include any big stick
It only included a mild expansionist policy that was dependent on investor’s dollars more than the navy’s battleships
Their American financial business interests abroad was promoted around the idea of it
3. There was a substitute for the economic ties for the military alliances
4. The American bankers started to replace the Europeans in the Caribbean
5. China, Japan, Russia alienated
6. Taft thought that it was important for him to be involved in investing in China
7. There was success but it was left out of the main agreement in the building
8. Taft causes a rivalry and possible end to open door policy in China
9. The Lodge Corollary to Monroe Doctrine was that the non-European powers, like Japan, would be excluded from owning territory in the Western Hemisphere in response to a group of Japanese investors wanting to buy Mexico’s Baja