In the mid-1700’s, due to the high debt created by the British after the French and Indian War, parliament created a series of new taxes used on only the American colonies to gain revenue. One of the most unpopular taxes, called the Stamp Act, required a stamp to be put on all legal documents for a certain fee. This upset many people in the colonies including the Virginia House of Burgesses, which was the legislature in Williamsburg, Virginia, at the time. The committee there created a resolution to ask the same rights as Britons, who had representatives in Parliament to defend themselves against taxation without representation (Document A).
Since the British Parliament did not listen to the colonial legislatures individually, some of the colonies joined forces to create Stamp Act Congress. This grouping was the first formal and organized unification of the American Colonies at the time and would snowball into the first and second Continental Congress which would take place ten years later. Stamp Act Congress (Document B) addressed issues and their possible solutions relating to the House of Commons in Great Britain, the Parliament. With the issue the Virginia House of Burgesses addressed, the Stamp Act Congress created the resolution of having a representative democracy styled legislature to discuss matters of taxation. These ideas were on par with that of the Considerations on the Propriety of Imposing Taxes in the British Colonies by Daniel Dulany which stated “A right to impose an internal tax on the colonies, without their consent for the single use of revenue, is denied.”(Document C)
“No taxation without representation!” was the slogan of many patriot groups like the Sons of Liberty in the mostly unified colonies of the 1770s. These patriots like Joseph Warren, who played a leading role in the patriot organizations in Boston and was a militia general at Bunker Hill, said that taxation without representation “could not be supported by reason and argument” and that “upon fair examination, appeared to be unjust and unconstitutional.” (D)
Beginning with the Stamp Act of 1764, the colonists found themselves with an unfair laws and government on their hands. With this issue at hand, new legislatures were formed in the American Colonies like The Stamp Act Congress (B), First, and Second Continental Congress. These legislatures strived for a representative democracy, one better than the one they were deprived of in House of Commons in Great Britain. By the 1770s, the ideals of rights of men, as those mentioned in the Virginia House of Burgesses (A) and Joseph Warren (D), spread throughout the colonies. It was the demand of no taxation without representation that unified the colonies and drove them toward a representative democracy which every man has his say.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Restated Thesis. Taxation without representation was common in the 13 colonies. Colonists often debated about why a small island, Great Britain, should rule a piece of a continent, the 13 colonies, from 3,000 miles away. The Stamp Act was issued by the British Parliament in 1765. The Stamp Act directly taxed printed materials. In Document 2, John Dickinson, a political leader from Pennsylvania, shows his disagreement with the Stamp Act. John Dickinson shares that Great Britain never thought the colonies would thrive as much as they did, so when the British Parliament issued the Stamp Act, and it was just for the purpose of raising Britain’s revenue, he disagreed with it. In addition, all the laws regarding the colonies only talked about regulating trade but it never intended the raising of taxes. John Dickinson, like many other patriots tolerated the old taxes, but at the Stamp Act, they drew the line, because Britain was taking money from the abundant colonies, with no benefits in return. The Townshend Acts followed the Stamp Act in 1767. Similarly, in Document 2, John Dickinson talks about the Townshend Acts having the same purpose as the Stamp Act, bringing more money to Britain. However, this time, when the Townshend Acts were issued, the tax was hid in the price. Charles Townshend hoped the colonists would be glad there were no more taxes even though the taxes would be right in the price. Unfortunately for Great Britain, the colonists realized that Britain was trying to be sneaky and hide the tax, so they got even madder. Moreover, the British never…
- 528 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
As seen in the British Order in Council, Parliament sees the acceptance of these new taxes and laws as a duty and responsibility of the colonies (Doc F). The colonies had had enough with the taxes and when the British decided to pass the Stamp Act of 1765, the colonists were outraged and in turn decided to protest. The colonies develop this idea of “no taxation without representation” in the British Parliament due to the ideas of James Otis, who argued it was against the British constitution. The colonies came together to hold the Stamp Act Congress in New York in 1766 to discuss how they were going to protest the new British tax; to which they decided a boycott of purchasing British goods would be put into place. As seen in Newspaper Masthead in October 1765, the colonist were already trying to find ways to encourage the repeal and resistance against the tax before the Stamp Act Congress (Doc H). The King and Parliament noticed the defiance of the tax, and were upset and confused until Benjamin Franklin goes…
- 574 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Stamp Act was a tax imposed on the colonies by the British. Every public and legal document had to have the British seal on it. The fee paid for the seal was used to fund the military defenses of the colonies. Patrick spoke emphatically before the members of the House of Burgesses and claimed that only the General Assembly of Virginia had the right or the power to tax the people of the colony. He then wrote and later published seven resolutions in opposition to the Stamp Act. The Townshend Acts were indirect taxes imposed on 72 different consumer goods that were not produced in America. All of these goods had to be imported from Britain as they had a monopoly in the market. The money raised from the tax was to provide independent salaries for govenors and magistrates. This left the colonies unable to withhold their salaries in the event they did their jobs poorly. At the Continental Congress Patrick Henry backed boycotting British goods and raising a continental…
- 686 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This Act allowed the colonists own representatives would be able to tax them. The colonies saw this Act as being unconstitutional. The colonists were very angry about the taxation laws that Great Britain set on them. The colonist created a mob of violence to scare the stamp collectors in order to make them leave their positions.…
- 295 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
While the colonies did not approve of the legislation, most of the outrage came from Virginia. The Virginia House of Burgess, a precursor to Congress, took upon itself the duty to respond to the King and express the colonies' displeasure with the tax. Protests were only ordered if the King refused to hear the colonists' complaints about the right to freedom from British taxation.…
- 368 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In America there were many reasons that colonists on both sides of the issue of taxation had for whether taxes on the American people were necessary and justified. In the reading about the colonist’s responses to the stamp act of 1765, both sides were represented. The people who were in favor of the stamp act felt that America had created a burden on the British government and that they needed to help lessen that burden on England. They also felt that since the government had protected the colonists from Native Americans that America owed them for maintain peace and their freedom. By continuing with the negative reactions the colonists were giving it would result in the loss of America and in by doing so would allow for other countries to use the opportunity to become stronger and challenge the authority of the English government. While some people were for taxation others were not as willing. They thought that since they were British citizens and they came to the colonies that they deserved the same rights as the people back Britain. Placing a tax on the colonist, they felt, was also in conflict with previous rulings of other decrees like the Manga Charta. They also placed an emphasis on how laws in England may…
- 346 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This Act, unlike its previous iteration, did not prohibit paper currency, however, it did render it useless for any debts, private or public, which helped steadily increase the amount of debt owed by the colonists. Responses to this legislation were almost entirely negative, with each state, without the addition of Delaware, agreeing upon it being a so-called “major grievance”. Furthermore, they decided to release a new direct tax, the Stamp Act of 1765 shortly thereafter. This entailed a tax on all stamped paper, which was soon required for many purposes such as, attorney licenses, court proceedings, as well as pamphlets. The taxes differed depending on the paper’s purpose, for example, ten pounds sterling being required for all attorney licenses, and playing cards being taxed a shilling per pack. These accumulated to an exponential increase in taxes, and were met with widespread disapproval; twenty-seven delegates from throughout the colonies held a Stamp Act Congress, that same year. The Stamp Act Congress was created out of the need for the colonies to combat Parliament’s incredulous taxation policies, and together, the delegates drafted a series of petitions that stated reasons taxation was unjust, and how they should go about ceasing said taxation. Following these meetings, Parliament had eventually decided to repeal the…
- 718 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
These distributors would collect a tax in exchange for the stamps (history.com staff) which went towards the coverage of £60,000 of the £200,000 that was required to station troops throughout the colonies (Tax History project). Unlike previous acts which were fixated on trade, the stamp act was first to directly apply a tax to goods within the colonies (Tax History project) which affected all members of the colony regardless of class or employment. With such a widely spread tax over all classes, unity and consensus of opinion towards the act was found amongst the colonists. Many forms of protest were shown against the Stamp Act, some political and other taking the form of a riot. In one particular instance, the House of Burgesses in Virginia challenged the power of Parliament by creating a series of resolutions that denied the right of taxing the colonists ( History.com staff). This led to the forming of the stamp act congress which comprised of delegates from nine colonies who wrote petitions to the king to address the fairness and rights of taxing (History.com Staff). In another instance, the more common of people participated in mobs. One of the more famous occurrences was a group called the Sons of Liberty who ransacked the house of stamp…
- 1508 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
This led to the second event of political significance that occurred in Federal Hall: the Stamp Act Congress. The Stamp Act Congress was held between October 7 and 25, 1765 to protest “taxation without representation”. The meeting was the first gathering of twenty-seven elected representatives from nine different American colonies that came together to protest British taxation. The colonists showed British Parliament that they were able to create a strong opposition. The meeting resulted in the Declaration of Rights and Grievances, which stated that there should be “no taxes imposed on Colonists without their consent or receive a tax from from a body which they have no representative in” (What was the Stamp Act Congress? Summary of 1765 Stamp Act Congress). The Stamp Act Congress created a newborn sense of unity among the colonists—and they realized much could be attained by working together. The Stamp Act Congress is now “generally viewed as one of the first organized and coordinated political actions of the American Revolution” (Stamp Act Congress 2015). It is significant to American politics as it played a “major role [in] enabling the organized colonial resistance that led to the American Revolution in 1775” (Stamp Act Congress 2015), and conclusively, American…
- 1143 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the reasons that fueled America's rage that ultimately led to the American Revolution and the breaking away from Great Britain was Great Britain's government and law-makings such as the Stamp Act of 1765. This act was passed mainly because Britain had amassed large war debts from wars like the French and Indian War. According to the Stamp Act, "American colonists were required to apply tax stamps to all official documents, including deeds, mortgages, newspapers, and pamphlets." This act was intended to generate money from the colonies that would help pay for the cost to keep up a stable force of British troops in the American colonies, but instead, led to oppositions by the American colonists. The colonists convened the Stamp Act Congress to protest the act, which they called, "taxation without representation." Colonists (who were already destitute) did not believe this act was righteous and fair, and it was because of this act that the colonists were forced to economic hardships and worst conditions of poverty. In addition, the Stamp Act not only led to economic depressions, but to the uprising of the colonists against the British and the…
- 976 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1763, the Proclamation of 1763 was established which prohibited colonists from settling was of the Appalachian Mountains. Colonists were already angry after losing to the British in the French and Indian War that they ignored this and settled into the Ohio River Valley. The British fired back with the Sugar Act in 1764 but the colonists started to protest against it. This is where the famous saying, “No Taxation without Representation!”, comes from. In 1765, the British established the Stamp Act which places taxes on all paper products. Such as, papers, legal documents, licenses, newspapers, and even playing cards. In response to this act, the colonists created committees to organize official boycotts. Also, Samuel Adams organized the Sons…
- 395 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
“No taxation without representation!” This was the cry that came forth from the American rebellion after George Greenville proposed the Stamp Act in England’s House of Commons. George Greenville had a plan to help pay off debt and help pay for soldiers to protect the American frontier. The Stamp Act, Greenville’s plan, was proposed on March 9th 1765 and took effect on March 22nd 1765. The act was to tax printed documents such as ship papers, legal papers, newspapers, licenses, and even playing cards. This act was passed by the British Parliament but wasn’t accepted for long from the Americans. To many it was taken offensively because taxes were originally used for commerce reasons; however, when the Stamp Act came about their money was being used for fundraiser purposes. Was Greenville’s Stamp Act plan a good idea? Although it helped pay off England’s debt and helped pay for England’s protection, it also upset those who were required to pay the extra tax with having no say as to how their money was being used (Colonial Williamsburg).…
- 1745 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
With the Sugar, Currency and Stamp Acts, colonists became angered with the amount of British Taxation. In Virginia, Patrick Henry made a speech to the House of Burgesses, in which he declared the Americans possessed he same rights as the English, and should be taxed only by their representatives and that no taxes unless were to be paid unless voted by the Virginia assembly. In Massachusetts in the summer of 1765, crowds began taking the law into their own hands, creating the breaking out of riots. A colonial organization was created called the Sons of Liberty who began to burn the stamps resulting in the ceasing of selling stamps. The colonies felt they should have representatives in Parliament…
- 809 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Even though the Stamp Act, the laws passed by the English Parliament to tax all paper used for legal or commercial purposes, has disturbed extremely within the colonies. However, John Dickenson still using a respectful tone in his words towards the British, “with the warmest sentiments of affection and duty to His Majesty’s Person and Government, inviolably attached to the present happy by a sense of the present happy establishment of the Protestant succession …”. Let us examine the reasons that made the colonists upset so much about the Stamp Act. First of all, all taxes need to be paid in English currency instead of colonial money. Making “the payment of them absolutely impracticable”. Anyone who violated the laws would be tried without a…
- 384 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The American Revolution embarked the beginning of the United States of America. A war that lasted eight years, 1775-1783, was able to grant the thirteen colonies the independence they deserved by breaking free of British rule. The war was an effect of the previous French and Indian War, which forced England to tax the American colonist, compelling them to rebel against parliament. From the 1760’s to 1775, many factors lead up to the American Revolution such as the various acts the British Parliament passed to pay the war debt, no representation in parliament, and the American people wanting to gain their independence. “No Taxation without Representation”, a slogan used by the American colonist, was the most important cause of the colonists declaring war for their independence on the British government.…
- 1116 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays