However, Aquinas does not make this move. Aquinas believes that God there is goodness. Aquinas states this in the Summa Theologiae when he says, We should especially associate goodness with God. For something is good in so far as it is desirable. But everything desires its perfection, and an effects’ perfection and form consists in resembling its efficient cause (since every efficient cause produces an effect like itself). So an efficient cause is desirable and may be called good because what is desired from it is that the effect share its goodness by resembling it. Clearly, then, since God is the first efficient cause of everything, goodness and …show more content…
Mainly, that I am ascribing many human qualities to God that God does not possess. I am stuck in the realm of human thought when conceiving of God. One should not compare and contrast God and humans. God is different than humans. God cannot be expected to have the same expectations of moral responsibility that humans have. For Aquinas there is goodness and power in God. It is inaccurate to say God is good or God is powerful. Aquinas does not want to ascribe personal moral goodness to God in the same way we say a person is morally good. Similarly, to how I ascribe different characteristics of what constitutes good in an infant and an adult, I must ascribe different characteristics between God and