Preview

Arbitration Is More Suited to Resolving Commercial Disputes Than the Courts?”

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1106 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arbitration Is More Suited to Resolving Commercial Disputes Than the Courts?”
“Arbitration is more suited to resolving commercial disputes than the courts?”
Arbitration is a method of settlement where a third party is brought in to analyse a dispute and impose a decision that is legally binding for both groups involved. Both sides put forth their problem and the arbitrator reviews all the circumstances and makes a decision based on all relevant information. It has been traced back and related to Brehon Law and stands as one of one of the oldest forms used to resolve a dispute outside of the courts. The court is, however, the only way that the decision can be over-ruled but this is extremely rare. Both parties must agree to resolve their dispute by arbitration. Without this consent, the arbitration will not be valid except in particular circumstances which arbitration is compulsory. 1
The arbitrator may be decided by the groups themselves but it is also possible to have one appointed by an institution. If a dispute arises it is possible to contact the local association where they may be able to suggest an arbitrator or how to find one. This arrangement is frequently outlined in contracts and clauses that are known to both parties. This agreement is kept completely confidential and it is very convenient in the respect that there is no time delay before the hearing.
Cases usually put to arbitration include payment disputes between different firms , between consumers and firms, agricultural disputes, family disputes like child custody and divorce situations, rape cases and industrial relations disputes. These situations and cases are resolved through arbitration to keep them private and confidential. This allows the companies names to be untarnished and protected unlike with a court hearing.



Bibliography: * International Commercial Arbitration – Alan Redfern and Martin Hunter * www.arbitration.ie * www.ciarb.org * www.irishstatutebook.ie * www.bnet.com – The CBS interactive Business Network * www.jurisonline.in * www.dublinarbitration.ie * www.newman.co.in – Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 +

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The arbitrator decides the rules, weighs the facts and arguments of both parties, and then decides the dispute. Arbitration may be voluntary or mandatory. ( naca.net)…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hsc300 Unit 4

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    7. Dispute Resolution: Where and how disputes between parties will be resolved; with courts and arbitration will be used…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arbitration is a relatively fast way to arrive upon a decision when two parties are in a dispute. Arbitration has definite benefits such as being flexible and not as formal as a traditional courthouse. Usually, arbitration can be scheduled quicker and with less working parts than a trial. In rare instances, if all parties involved come to an agreement, arbitrators can sometimes create rulings that judges are not allowed to decide. In arbitration, both sides present all evidence to an arbitrator in efforts to prove each side’s case. The arbitrator reaches a final verdict and decides whom the winners and losers are. An arbitrator does the job that a traditional judge or jury would normally do in court if the matter escalated to that point (Hill…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    CadMex and Gentura negotiated the choice of law clause that specifies which law will be applicable and what forum to use if a dispute arises between them. They determined that non-binding international arbitration would not only suit their needs, but it would be less costly than litigation and would also expedite dispute resolution. The international arbitrator’s power in conflict resolution will have a procedural outline in a written agreement that is agreed upon by both parties.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mediators do not give a final verdict on the case, but only serve as a resource of understanding between both parties. In the case that there is not an agreement, the parties can look to other avenues to resolve the legal issue, whether that be another ADR option, or court. In the same manner, Arbitration also uses a third party to handle disputes. When each party agrees to arbitration, usually an expert in the field is called to facilitate the process. Their responsibility is to listen to what each side has to present, and based on the evidence and information, provide a verdict for the case. Some of these cases can be binding meaning that a decision made by the arbitrator is final. In any other instances, if the case is not binding, then either party has the right to go to court if the verdict is not satisfactory (Arbitration and mediation, n.d.). Sometimes I hybrid version of these two processes, known as Med-Arb, may be the best approach. At the beginning of the process a mediator is established, but if an agreement cannot be reached through mediation, then the mediator takes position as an arbitrator and imposes a binding decision for…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Links for Business LAW

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page

    Erickson, D. & Bowen, P. G. (2005/2006). Two alternatives to litigation: An introduction to arbitration and mediation. Dispute Resolution Journal, 60(4), 42-28.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The court offers four different types of alternative dispute resolution which are arbitration, early neutral evaluation (ENE), Mediation, settlement conference with a magistrate judge. All of these types have pros and cons but ultimately the biggest con would be that regardless of these alternatives many cases continue to…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Litigation Law 531

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Disputes are settled by various means every day. This paper will consider the process of traditional litigation and alternative dispute resolution in settling those disputes. Knowing the advantages and disadvantages is important when deciding what process to employ in settling a dispute.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Team Paper

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The objectives for week one was to understand the major components of the legal system and differentiate between legal forms of business. The other objective was to obtain a thorough understanding of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) including advantages and disadvantages. Team B has collaborated on the discussion questions listed below and will reveal the team’s findings and opinions throughout this paper.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Townsend, J. (2003). Drafting Arbitration Clauses: Avoiding the 7 Deadly Sins. Dispute Resolution Journal. Vol 58 Issue 1, p34.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arbitration: An arbitration agreement is the hearing and the determining of a dispute and settling the differences between the parties by a person or a group of people chosen between the parties. It regularly defines certain processes that follow the case to move forward to and through arbitration…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Permanent Arbitrator or Umpire is an arbitrator who will resolve all disputes during the life of a labor agreement. This permanent status allows the arbitrator to become intimately knowledgeable about the industry, the company, and the union, and helps in providing a stable union-management relationship. The arbitrator’s jurisdiction evolves from the collective bargaining agreement, with most arbitrators being selected on an ad hoc basis. With the ad hoc basis, the arbitrator is selected on a case-by-case basis, which provides flexibility in the use of different arbitrators in addressing specific grievance issues.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a traditional litigation the process is very structured. Usually a lawyer is needed to represent then the process will proceed through the judicial system. A judge and jury will render an unpredictable ruling based on the law rather than justice. An alternative dispute resolution is much more flexible. In the alternative dispute resolution parties can select a neutral decision maker with specific expertise pertaining to the dispute. The procedure and format also can be agreed upon by both parties.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this scenario that the video presented, the defendant has the following ADR’s options: arbitration, mediation, conciliation, mini trial, and fact finder. The video makes a suggestion that the two viable ADR solutions would be arbitration or mediation. According to Cheeseman H (2010), “In arbitration, the parties choose an impartial third party to hear and decide the dispute. This neutral party is called the arbitrator. Arbitrators are usually members of the American…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays