Preview

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Dispute

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
957 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Dispute
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, or ANWR, is a refuge geared toward preserving national wildlife in northeastern Alaska. ANWR is about 19 million acres, in space, and contains a potential drilling spot for oil and petroleum. The potential drilling spot is a small area known as the 10-02 Area. It is only 1.5 million acres, or 8%, of ANWR, would even be considered for development (What is ANWR). The controversy surrounding ANWR is whether to drill or not to drill into the 10-02 area. Some people want to preserve the wilderness and to find more fuel-efficient technologies. Others want to lower gas prices and to create more job opportunities. If the government decides to drill for oil, it could possibly lead to about 17 billion barrels of oil, to last the United States for the next 20 years. According to the official ANWR website, Prudhoe Bay is located 60 miles west of ANWR and has produced about 10 billion barrels of oil in the past 20 years. It is currently producing about 1.4 million barrels a day, but is slowly declining; this induces the need for a new source. The northeastern part of ANWR is America’s best opportunity in finding another oil and gas field the size of Prudhoe Bay. The coastal plain of ANWR could produce up to 1.5 million barrels of oil a day and would save the U.S. $14 billion a year in imports (Making the Case). 75% of Alaskans want to drill in the designated ANWR area, 10-02. They feel that it could possibly relieve Americans of their foreign dependency for imported oil and petroleum. The United States currently spends up to $330 billion on foreign oil imports, not including the money used to protect and acquire it. The total area of area10-02 only amounts to 8% of ANWR’s total area, which is 1.5 million acres. Out of the 1.5 million acres considered for development, only 2,000 acres of the Coastal Plain would actually be affected, which is less than half of one percent (Top Ten). Drilling in ANWR would also create anywhere from 250,000 to


Cited: “Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.” Defenders.org. 2008. Defenders of Wildlife. 19 Oct. 2008. . “Making the Case for ANWR”. ANWR.org 2008. Frontier Communications. 19 Oct. 2008. < http://www.anwr.org/Background/Making-the-Case-for-ANWR.php>. “Top Ten Reasons to Support ANWR Development.” ANWR.org 2008. Frontier Communications. 19 Oct. 2008. < http://www.anwr.org/ANWR-Basics/Top-ten-reasons-to-support-ANWR-development.php>. Tsang, Clara. “Arguments Against Drilling in ANWR.” 19 Oct. 2008. . “What Development of Alaska’s Arctic Coastal Plain Means to Louisiana.” ANWR.org 2008. Frontier Communications. 19 Oct. 2008. . “What is ANWR and Where is it?” ANWR.org 2008. Frontier Communications. 19 Oct. 2008. < http://www.anwr.org/ANWR-Basics/What-is-ANWR-and-where-is-it.php>. “Wildlife Impacts from Oil Drilling in the Refuge.” Defenders.org. 2008. Defenders of Wildlife. 19 Oct. 2008. .
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dwight R Lee Analysis
    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dwight R Lee Analysis

    In his piece, Dwight R. Lee explains that with oil drilling the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, there would be many benefits as compared to the cost. He doesn’t deny that there would be risks associated with the drilling. However, he feels that they do not begin to compare to the benefits. He explains that the main reason that this has become such a hot topic is because of the high prices of gasoline and oil. One company that he looks at is the National Audubon Society. They are against opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling because they feel that it will “destroy the integrity.” This is the same company that owns the 26,000 acre Rainey Wildlife Sanctuary and opens it to drilling. By allowing this drilling, the Audubon Society has received more than $25 million. This has allowed them to own other wildlife and wilderness land.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Foreword To Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of Foreword To Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

    This article is adapted from former US President Jimmy Carter, Foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Carter uses anecdotes, evidence from reliable sources, and a call to action with pathos to persuade his audience that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry. The use of an anecdote in Carter's argument gives the reader an up close and personal look into the Arctic Nation Wildlife Refuge. It strengthens Carter's argument by stressing how beautiful and untouched this part of the world is and how it not only carries a great deal of importance to the animals that inhabit it but also to the indigenous people that have lived there.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    ANWR
    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ANWR

    The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) is located in the northeastern corner of Alaska. It consists of about 19 million acres of rolling hills, arctic tundra, and braided rivers along with a variety of migratory birds, caribou and sheep, and bears and wolves. On the west border of ANWR, there is oil development and on the east side of ANWR, the Canadians are drilling too. So, geologists believe that there is a major deposit of oil right in the northern part of ANWR. The question is whether to drill or not to drill in there.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ANWR pro drilling essay
    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ANWR pro drilling essay

    1. 8% of ANWR considered for drilling, and even this 8% wouldn’t harm the environment and surrounding habitats…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Informative: The Alaska Department Of Fish And Game
    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Informative: The Alaska Department Of Fish And Game

    In the beginning, Game management in Alaska was almost non-existent. It started in 1949 just as a fishery service put into place by the Territorial Legislator. The idea of the this wasn’t to control all the fish, but to influence the federal government 's way of looking at fish management in Alaska. It wasn’t until 1957 when the Alaska Fishery Service was changed to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Drilling Shouldn’t be Allow in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Drilling Shouldn’t be Allow in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

    In my opinion drilling shouldn't be Allow in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge because it is more of an environmental issue. Due to the fact that oil and gas exploration and development in the (ANWR) would have a major effect on the water resource. It is most concerning because it’s a factor that contributes, negatively towards a wide variety of species that are inhabitant of that particular area that are being affected by limited resource of water that they need for their survival. The reason drilling is an issue because it can alter the character of an ecosystem. For example Arctic ecosystem is characterized by many complex interactions, and changes to one component may have secondary but significant effects on other ecosystem components. Which means oil exploration and development have substantially changed environments where they have occurred in Alaska’s central Arctic. Another reason drill is an issue because of factor that comes into play when drilling occurs such as oil spills, contaminated waste, and other sources of pollution have had measurable impacts on an environment. Like the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska and the more recent Deep-water Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico. These disasters have displayed that there is no safe way to drill for oil and gas in the Arctic refuge, no way to guarantee wildlife will not be harmed by resource extraction in the refuge and no way to ensure the Arctic refuge will be protected for future generations and if Congress allows oil and gas exploration on the coastal plain there are costly consequences that wildlife have to endure. Oil drilling presents a potential risk of oil spills; in the Arctic the impacts of such spills could be catastrophic. Spills are more dangerous here because the combination of a colder climate, slower plant growth rates and longer animal life spans hinder recovery efforts. Additionally, no technology currently…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Cons
    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Cons

    For years there has been an environmental debate on whether oil drilling should begin in the largest refuge in the United States, Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge [ANWR]. High potential for oil within the refuge is estimated but the environmental impacts of oil drilling is harmful and destructive. Oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife refuge has pros and cons, however, cons are more significant as it deals with the environment and animals rather than politics and the economy. Pollution is a major consequence of oil drilling, oil spills are also a critical concern that would be devastating to the environment and the animals. Another major concern is climate change as an effect of pollution. The refuge provides a habitat in which…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Energy Crisis in Alaska
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Energy Crisis in Alaska

    Drilling for oil in Alaska, specifically its North Slope region continues to be a controversial topic amongst environmentalists, politicians and the oil industry. The North Slope is home to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, as well as the Prudhoe Bay Oil Field and the Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 4, the first oil-drilling site in the state. The government established the 12-million acre Reserve No. 4 in 1923 as a way to supply oil for ensuring national security. There are many arguments for and against the expansion of oil-drilling in Alaska. These arguments are:…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examine the costs and benefits of countries and TNCs exploiting energy resources in technically difficult and environmentally sensitive areas
    • 601 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examine the costs and benefits of countries and TNCs exploiting energy resources in technically difficult and environmentally sensitive areas

    The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) is a remote area in Alaska owned by the USA. It was stated a national monument in 1996 by Bill Clinton after the Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989 caused environmental damage in the Arctic Circle. It was named ‘Area 1002’ being the USA’s last wilderness, but there are talks over whether it should be used to drill oil. This is an environmentally sensitive area as being an untouched wilderness there are many indigenous or reliant species in this habitat. The Caribou is one species who migrate here and would be affected if the area became a drilling site and there was environmental degradation from oil leaks, CO2 emissions from the rig etc. The USGS have estimated 4.3-11.8 billion barrels of oil are recoverable, and this would only contribute between 0.4% and 1.2% of the world’s oil market, so the large costs would potentially be for little benefit.…

    • 601 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Offshore Oil Drilling Research Paper
    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Offshore Oil Drilling Research Paper

    An article by Stephen L. Baird titled Offshore Oil Drilling: Buying Energy Independence or Buying Time? Looks at both sides of the issue. Baird cites several polls that show growing support for offshore drilling, and that energy exploration is more important than conservation. Baird states that America imports…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Ethics of Fracking
    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ethics of Fracking

    On April twentieth, 2010 one of the biggest tragedies in the Gulf of Mexico occurred. This disaster was not a hurricane or any other natural disaster, it was an oil drilling rig off the coast of Louisiana. The rig exploded, claiming eleven lives and acting as a catalyst for the largest oil spill in history. This catastrophes fault was laid upon BP, or British Petroleum, who owned the oil rig but the fault also lies upon government regulators, inspectors and engineers, all the oversights and errors, both small and large. In the aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, five million barrels of oil were released into the gulf, threatening the sea life of the area for years and dealing a hard blow to the economy in the Gulf of Mexico. (Wikipedia) With a calamity of this size now in the past it is now possible to question the risk involved with extracting oil. With the instability of the methods the country uses to gain energy, are there alternatives to create a better future for all without damaging the earth in the process?…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Oil Drilling in the Arctic
    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Oil Drilling in the Arctic

    For an example of what your heavy machinery would do to the refuge, just look sixty miles west to Prudhoe Bay, one of the largest oil fields in North America. This giant oil complex has turned one thousand square miles of tundra into an industrial zone containing miles of roads and pipelines, over one thousand wells,…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Offshore Oil Drilling
    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Offshore Oil Drilling

    Many people are debating how to best meet energy needs in the United States. Some argue that the country must decrease its dependence on oil and invest in alternative sources of energy, such as wind and solar power. Others argue that changing to new power sources is unnecessary and expensive. They state that the United States should search for oil in Alaska, the Gulf Coast, and other currently unexplored areas within the country. I will state my opposition on this issue.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arguments Against Drilling
    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page

    Arguments Against Drilling

    The reason that the drilling was needed was to reduce gas cost, due to the George Bush imposed ban on the drilling that done in 1990. (Mason, 2010) Drilling will also create more jobs. The reason against it will be because we do not know the full extinct of the impact of drilling off the coast and it can cause environmental problems. I am still up in the air as to my decision, because one it is good for the economy which is good. But on the other hand, it can destroy our ecosystem. Drilling can create an imbalance in the ocean water ecosystem breach our water supply, wo with this I may be against it, Because I like to know what I am…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Offshore Drilling in the United States
    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Offshore Drilling in the United States

    In U.S., offshore drilling is a controversial topic due to its two-side effect, it had been banned since 1980s, but in 2010, the president Obama decided to Lifted restrictions and opened vast expanses of American coastlines to oil and natural gas drilling to reduce gas prices in U.S., whether it is necessary to allow the offshore drilling has become a troublesome problem. This paper will discuss the advantage and disadvantage of the offshore drilling.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics