How can people argue that humans are born evil when their natural instinct is to help others? This instance is shown when natural disasters, such as Hurricane Katrina, strike and devastate the lives of many. Instead of angry hordes looting the abandoned areas, civilization banded together in these times to help each other. According to the MH School, “Natural disasters like Katrina unite us all in our desire to help those in need. Good citizens do what they can to offer assistance. Some go directly to the hardest hit areas and lend their skills and talents. Others help to gather food, clothing, and money to send to the region. Children with little money of their own organized bake sales and lemonade stands to help raise funds for relief efforts. In the worst of all circumstances, all of these people acted on their best instincts.” Many citizens do what they can to help others in moments of despair. People have a predisposition to not be discourteous when others are struggling. This shows that peoples’ natural instincts are to be selfless and helpful to others through difficult …show more content…
They state that there is such wickedness in humans, such as serial killers and murders. For example, Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Bundy, and Peter Sutcliffe are all people who killed others without mercy. Nevertheless, many people do not realize that they act this way due to their environment. People don’t kill just to kill, there is a reason behind it, and that reason is either due to previous wrongdoings or for revenge. Kara Gillich, a student at Bryn Mawr College, wrote, “We are shaped entirely by our circumstances and environment.” This statement contributes to the current nature vs. nurture argument. People dispute that our behavior is based on the way we are treated and the area we are raised in. This reinforces the thought that these criminals are not naturally rancorous and it’s our environments that depict our