Preview

Are Vegans Better For The Environment Chapter Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
265 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Are Vegans Better For The Environment Chapter Summary
A chapter from the book The Way We Eat; Why Our Food Choices Matter by Jim Mason, “Are Vegans Better For the Environment”, brings up the point that some people think that factory farming is a necessity to feed the population that is growing so quickly. Mason mentions that it is actually reversed. This causes the idea that we need to have more land for animal agriculture, and this places a greater demand on the environment in land, energy, and water. He also talks about the different kind of farm animals and their needs in terms of feed. Mason talks about the water consumption usage, and degrading the land. The chapter “Are Vegans Better for the Environment” is relevant to my paper because Mason discusses all the issues that revolve around

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Lisa Hamilton’s “Unconventional Farmers; Let Them Eat Meat”, she justifies the issue of raising livestock for food causing greenhouse gas emissions. Should we be eating less meat or actually eating more? Hamilton’s research found many interesting points that would interest any human beings that consume meat or any other type of consumable goods.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    watchmen vs dark knight

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Environmental safety is the most important issue to be considered in this modern life. Joseph Pace in this article talks about how Animal-based agriculture is one of the most environmentally destructive industries on the face of the earth.Pace also talks about how the lands would be if people shifted away from meat.He…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case study from chapter 1 of Environmental Ethics for Canadians confirms Williston’s view on the ethical progress of consuming meat. His view is supported through his analysis between the relationship of eating meat and climate change, which references Regan and Singer’s perspective on animal welfarism.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Vegetarian Myth, written by author Lierre Keith, tackles the ever-heated question: To eat animal products or not to eat animal products? I add the word “products,” after animal because the book should more properly be called the vegan myth. As a former vegan of over twenty years Keith comes from a place of experience, or as she might have it, a bitter experience. Feeling betrayed, in denial, and physically ill from her vegan years, she has made it her goal to reveal the truth and put to rest the Vegetarian notion that abstaining from animal products is the righteous path that is morally correct, will feed the hungry, and lead to greater nutrition. Chapter one, titled “Why This Book” will be the focus of this analysis because it gives an appropriate introduction to Keith’s…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The author starts off strong with logos, which appeals to logic. In response to the comments about animals in our food production, she writes, “the studies show only that the prevailing methods of producing meat — that is, crowding animals together in factory farms, storing their waste in giant lagoons and cutting down forests to grow crops to feed them — cause substantial greenhouse gases” (Niman), meaning that small farms and farms can cut down on greenhouse gases if, “they keep their animals outdoors on pasture and make little use of machinery.” (Niman) She points out, “In contrast to traditional farms, industrial livestock and poultry facilities keep animals in buildings with mechanized systems for feeding, lighting, sewage flushing, ventilation, heating and cooling, all of which generate emissions,” which are what most statistics pointing the guilt finger at meat production are referring to. The author, being a “rancher…who raises cattle, goats and turkeys the traditional way (on grass)” (Niman), neatly brushes off relations of “meat (especially beef) is closely linked to global warming” (Niman), to her own farm. Meat and dairy would certainly win the greenhouse gas competition if not…

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another year passed and I went vegan, cutting off all forms of exploiting animals equally for ethical and environmental reasons. The difference between veganism and vegetarianism is vast. Vegetarianism only cuts out the consumption of meat, ignoring the damage of all animal agriculture in total. And avoiding animal products of every sort, as I have found, leads to a more peaceful and cleaner earth. Initially, vegans avoid a leading contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, wasting countless amounts of clean drinking water able to produce healthy foods, and aiding horrendous accounts of deforestation. A further gentle impact on earth calls for other things than just being vegan. Since being vegan, I've realized and acted on the importance of recycling and using reusable water bottles and containers. Also, recently I have stopped shopping at large brand name companies simply in that they aren't fair…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article, “Vegetarian is the New Prius”, written by Kathy Freston, discusses the amount of contribution that livestock actively plays in the most crucial and serious environmental problem, from a local scale to global scale. Freston writes that the amount of livestock raised in United States soil is the main cause of air pollution, land degradation, water shortage, water pollution, biodiversity, and especially aids to global warming. This article attempts to convince readers to cut meat out of their diet and to become vegetarians, so that less livestock would be raised to feed the people and environmental issues would be cut down. Although it is true that Freston provides the audience with solid, legitimate factual arguments concerning the brutal slaughtering and consumption of livestock by humans, she fails to address the opposing argument. Although I am a personal fan of vegetarian foods, I disagree with Freston, primarily because my family has raised me on chicken and other meats. I believe that there will be livestock whether a lot of people change their diets and become vegetarians or not. At the University of Chicago, researches concluded that feeding animals for the production of meat, eggs, and dairy products requires growing upwards of ten times as many crops needed than if we just went without livestock. According to a report done by the United Nations animal agriculture takes up 70% of all agricultural land, and 30% of the total land surface of the planet. Upon seeing these disturbing facts, I do not believe that society will never 100% convert to a vegetarian lifestyle. Even if they do, there will still be millions of wild animals producing all of the same gases that are so harmful to our environment.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Factory Farming Should Be Banned.” Debate Argument says “Non-factory farmed foods are usually placed in the "organic" sections of grocery or stores such as Fresh Market where "green" foods sold. People who shop at organic grocery stores pay 20% more than people who shop for conventional foods”. But I argue that these factory farms could be treating their animals better, by giving them more space,sunlight and happiness and It wouldn't lose them money. An example for how badly these animals are treated is pigs.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2013 8.6 billion chickens and 33.2 million cattle were processed by the meat and poultry industry (The United). Those animals were most likely raised in factory farms. Do you know what a factory farm is or what the conditions are like in them? Factory farms are often very overcrowded. Changes need to be made in the living arrangements and slaughter methods of livestock because we depend on then for survival, these animals deserve humane treatment and unsanitary conditions can lead to dangerous diseases.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meat vs. Vegan

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sunaura and Andrew Taylor’s “Is It Possible to Be a Conscientious Meat Eater?” is an informative essay about the dirty side of the meat industry. They speak out of the physical abuse and poor living conditions endured by animals raised solely for the purpose of consumption. Because of the inhumane treatment towards animals, Taylor talks about a vegan solution and the many benefits associated with it. Animal cruelty is a sensitive topic that readers can easily be persuaded to either side. But, for the purpose of this essay, the reader can be swayed towards being a conscientious consumer. As mentioned already, animal rights and veganism will be discussed.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals kept in tight spaces together causes the amount of waste to be large and the land surrounding it cannot handle it. With this, environmental hazards such as pollution in water, air, and land have become more common. Sickness in humans living close to factory farms have become more common such as respiratory problems, skin infections, and nausea. Factory farms, they are inhumane, they are in an ungodly manner, they are not right, they cause animals unnecessary harm, they cause animals to live an unnatural lifestyle. In…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Factory Farm

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Our society is showered with happy animals living on a farm where the cows graze in lush green fields and the chickens have the run of the barnyard. This free-roaming image of an animal living out their days in sunny fields is far from reality. A majority of the animals that are raised for food live miserable lives in confined, dark, overcrowded facilities, commonly called "factory farms."…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals Vs Vegetarianism

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Vegetarians do not eat any meat but still consume egg and dairy products. However, the egg and dairy industry may also raise their animals in poor conditions, even organic, free-range, or “certified humane” farms. The male infant laying hens “are invariably killed as soon as they have been sexed” because they have “no commercial value” (Mason and Singer 279). Price could still arise as an issue for many because similar to the free-range and certified humane meat, these types of eggs and dairy products are also generally more expensive. “Veganism is a sure way of completely avoiding participation in the abuse of farm animals” which is what Singer believes is the only sure way of avoiding the unethical implications of eating factory farmed food (Mason 279). Singer gives compelling evidence and asserts that going vegan, despite the other alternatives, is the only sure way to avoid taking part in the abuse of animals. Since vegans do not consume any animal based products at all, they completely ensure that they are not promoting the abuse of farm animals anywhere in the production process. He further maintains that no matter how drastic the change away from supporting the factory farming industry could be on the individual at first, not doing so simply because it is difficult is an unsound moral…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal agriculture has an impact impact on the environment. It is estimated it accounts for 75% of greenhouse gas emissions in the developing world(walsh). About two thirds of agricultural land is used to feed livestock(Brooks). This is pretty bad I mean we could be using this land to feed the world; but instead we are using it for what? Bacon.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays