Arendt Good Vs Evil Summary

The ideology of tow-in- one is the dialogue between you and your self. Human nature is innate and ignorant of what is good and evil in the life, but it acquires it from people those who are around you. The evil values around you increase the value of hatred. However, the final choice is due to the self and to the direction of good or evil if you use their acquired nature belongs to the acquisition attribute of those around you. To the values of good or evil to the extent of upgrading the mental system of being. If it' s knowledge and scientific dimensions are wide it can distinguish between the act of good and act of the evil it is harmful to the self and society. “Politically, the weakness of the argument has always been that those who choose the less evil forget very quickly that they chose evil” By Hanna Arendt.
Also, Arndt believes that the conceptual thinking of those who think at some time need to think about the times of political and moral collapse. “The presupposition for this kind of judging is not a highly developed intelligence or sophistication in moral matters, but merely the habit of living together explicitly with oneself, that is, of being engaged in that silent dialogue between me and myself which since Socrates and Plato we usually call thinking." In contrast, we can relate the vision of past and future at the same as repeated scenes. Which are the power and government today are now a totalitarian authority imposing their authority on society and leading to the collapse of the country. this image demonstrates that there will always be things that break the rules, things that can’t be controlled, can’t be understood. Governments will always be overthrown. Systems will always be replaced. The concept of individuality and personal philosophy is to replace oppression with