Preview

Arendt-Theory of Totalitarianism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2292 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arendt-Theory of Totalitarianism
Hannah Arendt’s Theory of Totalitarianism:
Hannah Arendt is widely regarded as one of the most important, unique and influential thinkers of political philosophy in the Twentieth century. Arendt was greatly influenced by her mentor and one time lover, Martin Heidegger, whose phenomenological method would help to greatly shape and frame Arendt’s own thinking. Like Heidegger, Arendt was sceptical of the metaphysical tradition which tended towards abstract conceptual reasoning; ultimately at odds with the reality of human lived experience. Consequently, Arendt was highly dubious of being referred to as a philosopher, as she felt philosophy was, by its own essence, confined to the proverbial ivory tower. She believed political life was at the apex of human experience and so she identified as a political thinker/actor. Her emphasis on the phenomenological nature of the lived political experience permeates her life’s works and perhaps can be said to constitute her own distinct brand of political philosophy. Arendt’s early publication, Ideology & Terror: A Novel Form of Government, is a profound elucidation of the nature of the theretofore unprecedented (she argues) phenomenon of Totalitarianism and its “origins...elements...and functioning...”
A Novel Form of Government:
Arendt posited that the totalitarian forms of “government and domination” (Arendt. 303) which characterised the Nationalist Socialist party in Germany and Stalin’s oppressive regime in Soviet Russia, which saw systematic genocide and terror visited upon literally millions of innocent people, were unprecedented in the history of political systems, and were not mere modern manifestations of ancient forms of violent government such as despotism or tyranny. She went further even, to suggest that totalitarian systems had destroyed the very foundations upon which traditional ideas and presuppositions of government rested. Although totalitarianism seemed to contain elements of tyrannical or despotic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The terrors of a totalitarian government presented in George Orwell's 1984 apply not only to the Party, but also to the Stalinist Russia of the 1930's. Frightening similarities exist between these two bodies which both started out as forms of government, and then mutated into life-controlling political organizations which "subordinated all institutions and classes under one supreme power" (Buckler 924). Orwell shows how such a system can impose its will on the people through manipulation of media, constant supervision as aided by technology, and the threat of pain, both physical and mental. Orwell also shows how the state has more subtle methods for imposing its authority, such as the manipulation of language and propaganda as they are used to achieve the goal of absolute power for the system. A key parallel between the Party and Stalin's Communism is the use of technology and communication to control the economic, social, and personal aspects of life.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the course of my essay, I will attempt to clarify the meaning of totalitarianism, briefly analyze a dictatorial mind and its weapons; highlight a few historical as well as present-day examples of oligarchic governance and offer an in-depth analysis of the novel Animal Farm by George Orwell as well as the novel Nineteen Eighty Four by the same author while relating it to the topic of discussion. My personal opinion has also been included.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    She comments on the “principle of action,” as the twin criteria of organization. She also comments on the difference between “lawful” and “lawless.” “Arendt argues that Western political thought has customarily distinguished between ‘lawful’ and ‘lawless’, or ‘constitutional’ and ‘tyrannical’ forms of government” (Dietz) Arendt reveals that terror is at the core of a totalitarian government and that terror is based on ideology. Arendt uses two types of governments to prove a point; fascist Germany and communist Russia. These governments are very controlling and difficult to live in, like totalitarian governments. She clears up the fact that totalitarian governments are not run by tyranny. She explains that even though it seems as if tyranny could be the only way a government would be run like that, that it wasn’t. Having first hand experiences with a type of totalitarian government makes her arguments very…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Margaret Canovan argued that Hannah Arendt failed to realize that political opinions too have drawbacks. According to Arendt, different people have different opinions and claims that one political opinion can bring an enhancement on another. Based on this assumption, she adopted Kant’s notion of “judgement,” that is, “to think for the sake of general” into her political thinking. But Habermas rejected her ideas on the ground that it is “monologic.” She seems to have left no room for “rational truth” in political affairs. On the other hand, Canovan also disputed on Habermas’s insistence for fixing his attention on rational consensus. Habermas assumes that “just” society can be institutionalized if political discourse is based on ideal discourse. On this ground, Arendt also argued that Habermas’ idea of placing politics on rational consensus might lead him into a dangerous illusion. Canovan’s concern on the distinctive views of rational communication between Arendt and Habermas however leave a sarcastic remark on the latter because according to her Habermas might have to wait his whole life in…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1984

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Enteen, George M. "George Orwell and the Theory of Totalitarianism: A 1984 Retrospective." Journal of General Education 36.3 (n.d.): 206-15. Print.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hitler. Stalin. Mussolini. These three names define World War II. World policy revolved around them for at least a decade or in Stalin 's case for almost fifty years. Much is generally known about each man 's role in the war, but only as it pertains to the outcome. Not many people possess extensive knowledge of these dictators as individuals or as leaders of a particular party. This paper will attempt to shed light on the differences as well as the similarities of they style of totalitarianism that the three men who shaped the middle of the twentieth century implemented in their respective countries.…

    • 3072 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Banal Evil

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Whitfield, Stephen J. "Hannah Arendt and the Banality of Evil." The History Teacher. 4th ed. Vol. 14. Society for History Education. 469-77. August, 1981. JST. Web.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1984

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Totalitarianism is a political system with absolute and total rule over its people. The state has no limits to its authority and tries to regulate every aspect of public and private life. This is most evident when Orwell writes, “it was conceivable that they watched everybody all the time.” The danger of this form of government is that your life ceases to be your own.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the eyes of a power hungry ruler, a totalitarian government would be paradise. It would be thought that if a leader is so happy with the way he rules his country, the grass would be greener on the other side. In this case, it is far from it. Citizens are forced to act upon the government’s rules, and failure to do so would only earn them a horrid session of torment and consequence. People are constantly under the government’s thumb, and practically have no say in what goes on around them. An American President once said, “ The seeds of totalitarian regimes are nurtured by misery and want. They spread and grow in the evil soil of poverty and strife. They reach their full growth when the hope of a people for a better life has died” (Harry Truman). A totalitarian government’s goal is to see and ignore the peoples’ needs, then take that factor and use it against them by making threats of not making change if the people choose not to cooperate with them. They promise the society a better life, so long as the people do not cease to abide by the government’s orders. When everyone is a mere laborer for the government, looking forward to seeing no change and happiness in their surroundings, the government has then accomplished their goal, and continue to control its people like puppets in their hands. In the end, this comes to show that Truman was indeed theoretically correct, for every ruler who had claimed to be a totalitarian had oppressed their people of rights and freedom, and Truman took action to notice the effects. In 1984, the society of Oceania was overrun by a totalitarian government. During Josef Stalin’s reigning era, he also partook in a totalitarian government. The people were beaten to death, starved, and looked forward to nothing, but were forced to act as they were told.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler ruled in totalitarian governments. Totalitarian governments are defined by a government that stays in power through propaganda, media, restriction of speech, mass surveillance, and fear. In the early 1900s, totalitarian governments were on the rise. Examples of totalitarianism in Europe existed in fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, and Soviet Russia. George Orwell, a British author, recognized the horrors of totalitarian governments and wrote 1984 as a warning against totalitarian rule. Orwell utilizes symbols such as Big Brother and Goldstein, telescreens, and the Glass Paperweight to illustrate the dangers of a totalitarian government.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1984, George Orwell demonstrated what life was like to live under a totalitarian government, by showing the harsh realities that it can bring. In 1984 Orwell shows how controlling the government is and how the people lack freedom and how they are constantly told what to do. The people are televised and everything they do is recorded, from the time they wake up, to the time they go to sleep. They are never in private. They do whatever the government tells them without thinking. Controlled by the political leaders and their followers, ( The Thought Police ) they have no mind of their own.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1984 Totalitarianism

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Governments are the powerhouse of a country. However, when they contain too much power, they not only run the country, but the lives of every citizen. In other words, governments like those are considered totalitarian, They control all parts of society, including the daily life of their inhabitants. Total submissiveness is required, and opposition is punished severely. In 1984 by George Orwell, the reader can infer that the government is totalitarian based on their ideals and values. Especially in aspects surrounding society and everyday life, Big Brother’s party is evidently a totalitarian regime.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall, Stalin did not create a totalitarian state, the very definition of which suggests the state’s complete control and authority over every aspect of society; the economy, politics, religion and culture; as, despite all of the action Stalin took to gain this, he was constantly facing opposition.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the dissection of the novel, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, the belief of a pure totalitarian government system existing will be demolished by first discussing what the government can and does control in a totalitarian society, then by expressing what they cannot control including the psychological ideas of thought, feeling, and action. The USSR prison camp had control over what the prisoners wore on a day-to-day basis. They provided a pair of mittens, a shirt and vest, and trousers with one pocket on the left knee (5, 27). The camp also provided a black jacket (5), a white cap (17), felt boots (3, 9), and two pairs of foot cloths (9, 21).…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Enteen, George M. "George Orwell And The Theory Of Totalitarianism: A 1984 Retrospective." Journal Of General Education36.3 (1984): 206-15. ERIC. Web. 14 Oct. 2013…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays