What the whole thing comes down to in my opinion is fear from people
What the whole thing comes down to in my opinion is fear from people
In California, it is mandatory for drivers to have liability coverage when operating a vehicle. But insurance gaps can happen. Many don’t even realize their insurance is lapsed. Proposition 213 limits the damages an uninsured driver can recover. However, there are exceptions where you can still be compensated.…
“This case is about crushing dissent. In a free America, people with differing beliefs must have room to coexist,” ADF’s senior counsel Kristen Waggoner said in a statement. “It’s wrong for the state to force any citizen to support a particular view about marriage or anything else against their will. Freedom of speech and religion aren’t subject to the whim of a majority; they are constitutional guarantees.”…
Prop 51,gives more money to charter schools but Californians already pay $2 billion each year on state school bonds therefore, If this proposition is passed this could cost an additional $500 million each year, money the state can’t afford. What truly matters is the attendance rate, if more students are present then schools get more money without having to increase taxes. People should vote no on Proposition 51 for one reason and that is taxes because California is already in debt and paying back taxes is a major issue.The annual budget is more than the schools combined, these schools are required to pay back or they may lose the education for students such as books,desks, chairs, and most of all, facilities, and schools have to do funds and…
When I was first brainstorming about who will be affected positively or negatively by Proposition 47, the first thing that came to me was budgeting or financing of the proposition. When I searched for that the first link that I came across said that it roughly costs about $50,000 to incarcerate somebody “California’s annual costs to incarcerate an inmate in prison”. When I heard that I was trying to think of that math equation and it came to a massive expense and finding that out it is a reasonable argument that someone could use against proposition 47. When I made myself search for the pros of proposition 47 so that I could inform someone fully about this proposition. Soon after I was searching I found a strong article for proposition 47 which provided good arguments for it.…
Similar to this case, Mr. Smith can argue that he is not discriminating against gays but he refuses to be involved with something that in his religion is considered “immoral and ungodly purpose.” He can also challenge California’s Unruh Act and call out the Fourteen Amendment because this law is forcing to abandon his freedom of religion. In the Fourteen Amendment, Section 1, states that “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States…[and] deprive any person of life, liberty, or property”(US. Constitution, Amendment XIV, Sec 1). This means that California has no right to force him to follow a law that violates his liberty to enforce his practice of religion. Alike, Davis, for Mr. Smith, refusing to provide services to gay couples, is part of the practice of his religion. On the other hand, Adam and Steve would claim that Mr. Smith is using freedom of religion as an excused to discriminate against them because of their sexual orientation. As stated before, the Unruh Act states that all persons of the state of the California are free, equal, and cannot be denied access to business’ services because of sexual orientation, race,…
1In a 7-2 decision, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Lawrence v. Texas case (2003) ruled that state laws were unconstitutional and the Supreme Court overturned the Texas law as a violation of the right to privacy and the Equal Protection clause of the fourteenth Amendment. 2The majority opinion indicates that the Court of Appeals considered their decision in Bowers v. Hardwick to be controlling on the federal due process aspect of the case. Harris County Police officers were dispatched to Lawrence’s home in response to a weapon disturbance, where he was found engaged in sexual activity with another man, and they were arrested under a Texas ruling that prohibited such behavior between two men. 2The effect of Texas' sodomy law is not just limited to the threat of prosecution or consequence of conviction. Texas' sodomy law brands all homosexuals as criminals, thereby making it more difficult for homosexuals to be treated in the same manner as everyone else.…
The outcome was close, five to four, within the voting of the supreme court. “Five Justices who compose today's majority are entirely comfortable concluding that … Massachusetts permitting of same-sex marriages in 2003” (Scalia). The five judges that voted to pass understood that by not allowing same-sex marriage starts “were crossing the 14th Amendment rights. State laws banning same-sex couples from exercising the fundamental right to marry”(Solomon). To make it so someone can not marry who they want is horrible.luckily the law was…
The SHSAT is the only factor taken into consideration during the admissions process for the specialized high schools of New York City. The Hecht-Calandra Act was passed in 1971 for what was considered the four elite high schools of New York which included: Stuyvesant High School, Bronx High School of Science, Brooklyn Technical High School, and Fiorello H. LaGuardia of Music & Performing Arts. This bill made it so that the only admissions criteria the four schools had was an exam particularly focusing on math and English Language Arts. In 2002, Queens High School for the Sciences at York College; High School for Math, Science and Engineering at City College; and High School of American Studies at Lehman College were established as specialized…
Imagine that you were a Supreme Court justice when the same-sex marriage case (Obergefell v.Hodges) was decided. How would you have voted and why? Now imagine that a case about legalizing polygamy (overturning Reynolds v. United States) comes before the court. How would you vote and why?…
“California Secretary of State -CalAccess -Campaign Finances.” California Secretary of State -Campaign Finances. Web. 30 Oct. 2012…
Proposition 203, the medical marijuana initiative, has passed in Arizona as of the November 2010 elections. An amazing demonstration of how every vote counts, it passed by less than 5,000 votes. This means that in Arizona, doctors can prescribe marijuana to patients and they can receive legal marijuana for medicinal use.…
I believe that gay marriage should be decided by the states. However, I do not believe in the opinion that my state holds on this issue. I think that if two people of the same sex get married in a state that it is legal then marriage rights should apply to them even in the states where gay marriage is not legal, sadly this is not the case. I do believe that with this topic strict interpretation should…
The Crusades were a series of religiously sanctioned military campaigns waged by much of Western Christian Europe, particularly the Franks of France and the Holy Roman Empire. The specific crusades to restore Christian control of the Holy Land were fought over a period of nearly 200 years, between 1095 and 1291. There are several reasons for the Crusades, but the importance and relevance of some are debated by scholars even to this day.…
My ethical perspective lens rights and responsibilities; I tend to use reasoning skills to determine duties as well as universal rules that each person should follow. I prioritize the value of being in charge over equality. My primary concern would be protecting my individual rights, believing that it is the best way to assure that everyone in the community is treated fairly.…
This lead to the ballet initiative 2 in 1998 in Hawaii. “Amendment to ban same sex marriage.” The yes vote was “no to gay marriage” and the no vote was “yes to gay marriage.” (Which made it a little confusing). A bunch of interest group played a big role in this. The movement to legalize same sex marriage failed in Hawaii because of how much the impacts of special interest groups. First off, JACL interest group voted no based on discrimination. The Japanese in Hawaii voted no as a block. Native Americans voted Yes on this ballet because they believed it would affect tourism and threaten sovereignty. The Gay/Lesbian voted no obviously base on their self interest discrimination. The Religious group voted yes on…