Intermediate composition
Final Draft
12/12/05
The Four-River Restoration Project
At first, the government tried to make the Korean Grand Canal to transfer people and supplies using ships. However, many people had been opposed to the plan severely, and the government gave up and started the Four-River Restoration Project. This project is a government enterprise for the purpose of preventing floods, securing water resources and encouraging restoration of the land. The government insists that the project is efficient and good for people’s lives. It can help to prevent floods and droughts by securing water resources. The improvements of the water quality can make the rivers sound. Also, regional economy can be revitalized by the government investing a large sum of money. However, the movements against the Four-River Restoration Project usually began with the Buddhist community, Catholics, and the environmental groups opposing the government’s views extensively. Also, most people are anxious, and doubt the truth about the project because there are resultant problems in economics and natural environment from the Four-River Restoration Project. So, I am against the Four-River Restoration Project.
The Four-River Restoration Project is uneconomical. It is very costly to implement this project. The Four-River Restoration Project costs 22 trillion won to make the water routes. Also, the annual maintenance costs are enormous. It is about 3.5 trillion won. In addition, the costs for preventing destruction of the environment and disturbing the ecosystem are added to the expenses. I think that is a complete waste of time and money. Though, the government emphasized the benefits of this project continually. They put emphasis on preventing many disasters, environmental remediation, cultural development and economic development. However, the damages outweigh the advantages in the strict words.
Second, there are many environmental disadvantages in the Four-River Restoration Project. Korea has many mountains, and it is surrounded by range after range of mountains. Many mountains have to be dug to make the water routes. Also, the grades of the mountains are steep to navigate, so the government will have to equip the stair-type stanks in a mountainside to set many ships afloat. Also, most countries having the canals are the country with the vast flatland such as Germany. In addition, there is rainy season in Korea. The level of water between the highest and the lowest is as large as 260 times. So, the stanks must be huge as the dams.
Third, the Four-River Restoration Project can do more harm than good for the environment. This project destroys the ecosystem and causes the disasters of the environment. To set up many stanks, the size of the dams, they have to dig through the mountains and rivers, and construct some banks with concrete. These situations could destroy our nature, and made floods because the water routes become straight. So, the force of flowing water is getting stronger. In addition, this causes droughts and drying up of the underground water. If the surface of the underground water becomes lower, the woods will wither and die. There is no help to make the rivers sound, and prevent the floods and droughts. Also, the quality of the water will be getting worse because of the constructions.
Of course, each side brings its own advantages and disadvantages. However, it is sure that the demerits are more than the merits of the Four-River Restoration Project. Now, there are no reasons that have to restore the four Rivers right now. Our rivers are not polluted severely as the government said, and floods and the shortage of water are not as serious as all that. In addition, a large-scale construction like the Four-River Restoration Project does not need. Also, the Four-River Restoration Project requires the taxes from the public, but most of them do not want to do. Destruction of the environment is now the most worrisome, too. I am afraid I could not see the long, winding natural rivers when the construction will be over. So, I oppose the Four-River Restoration Project.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Daniel Weintraub in the article,”River Restoration Project Offer a Sprinkling of Hope”, claim that only 20 %of the water was recovered. Weintraub supports his statement by telling us that they had restoration plan to help them get most of their water back one way or another.The author’s purpose is to prove that at least they can get some of the water back in order so that the people can help them out and can use less water. The author writes in an academic tone for the…
- 87 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
rivers were dammed and diverted which in turn caused mass flood and led to the deterioration of…
- 1299 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
There can be so many different consequences from river diversion, downstream river discharge is reduced, the evaporation in the…
- 1219 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the article, “River Plan Too Fishy for My Taste Buds,” written by Bill McEwen, he express his expectations and concerns toward the river restoration plan on the San Joaquin River. You might wonder how long ago was this? McEwen wrote these concerns in 2009! It has been approximately six years since these articles were published. Now we are able to analyze the results of the river restoration program and how it affected the people and animals involved with it. We can evaluate if the river conditions were unsuitable for the salmon to thrive as previously believed. The river restoration program can also be studied to see if it is boondoggle. In addition, are the farmers greedy when it comes to the San Joaquin River?…
- 849 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Objective of river restoration: To restore the natural beauty of the river, and make it accessible to the public. To reinstate the natural floodplain as the flood prevention technique, as part of a large catchment area. To allow ecosystems to flourish and grow.…
- 406 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This assumption is that the budget for another part of cit maintenance or building will be tapped into to. In addition, to the budget being used to clean up Mason River, it will also be allocated in increasing riverside recreational facilites. The government is trying to appease its residents, and one can warrant that the role of the government is to please the people. There are many assumptions being made; however, the government can not make the assumption that people want the river to be cleaned so that they can use it for recreational water activities. The government has to realize the long term effects that their decision will have on the monetary value of their…
- 295 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The fish that live in the Elwha River are not able to swim upstream and get the food they need and they cannot reproduce so the salmon population just dominates. The Grand Coulee dam was another but its problem was not fish it was flooding and erosion. I would say this is a very controversial topic because the people might believe pro-environment or some might be pro-economy. My point of view on this topic is I do not understand why we say we want to save the environment but we pay millions of dollars to build dam but in which harm the environment by killing of fish. However, I do understand that dam do provide energy. I believe that if we want to have dam for energy we do not need multiple small dams throughout the country instead build a couple of huge one so you are not killing all the fish you are only killing some of them but you are also getting the energy you…
- 369 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The government plays a key role in trying to secure a sustainable water future. This is because it can invest in large scale projects such as the Chinese South-North project where the Chinese government plan to give the north a more sustained water supply. Governments can also subsides water projects, such as those done by IGOs in developing countries. However, it could be argued that government involvement in securing a sustainable water future may not be sustainable, as such big projects comes with its high costs which usually results in debts, which is not economically sustainable.…
- 522 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
New developments and restoration of river have become an extreme benefit, significantly impacting the population and societies of the San Joaquin Valley. “It’s more than just for fish. It’s going to be good for recreation, for all kinds of other endangered species. We’re doing more than just bringing back a few fish into the system. We’re creating a river and that’s going to be an amazing thing.”…
- 513 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The article “River Plan Too Fishy For My Tastebuds” by Bill McEwen shows how the River Restoration Project is flawed in so many ways. McEwen proves to be more credible because he has worked for the Fresno Bee for 35 years and that shows he is very professional. This article was published by the Fresno Bee. The Fresno Bee receives an average of 8.6 million pageviews a month. The article was propagated in the six-county region of Fresno, Fresno is one of the fastest growing regions in California. There typical readers are farmers and poor people. The Fresno Bee cares more about the environment and the people. I disagree with the River Restoration Project because it isn’t worth the costs. It isn’t worth the costs because it is a project that will take many years to get started and it will worsen California's drought problem. This article by McEwen captures his take on ethos, pathos and logo by stating that several experts and .…
- 781 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Using named examples, assess the contribution of large scale water management projects in increasing water security. 15 Water security means having access to sufficient, safe, clean and affordable water. Theoretically, the world’s poorer countries are the most water insecure, suffering from both physical and economic water scarcity. One solution to tackle water insecurity is through large scale water projects for example the Three Gorges project in China, the South-North transfer project also in China and the restoration of the Aral Sea. However there is much controversy over whether these schemes are actually sustainable and therefore beneficial in the long run. The Three Gorges da project in China blocks the Yangtze River; it cost $50 billion just for the construction, and was fully operational on the 4th of July 2012. This cost doesn’t account for the environmental and social costs that also came with the scheme. The dam drains 1.8million km2 and will supply Shanghai’s population of 13 million along with Chongqing’s population of 3 million with sufficient supplies of water. Not only has it provided people with water but it’s also the worlds’ largest hydroelectric scheme generating 18000MW of electricity, instead of using 50 million tonnes of coal each year. As well as this, it is seen as a flood protection and can save many lives and cut financial costs created by flood damage. When the operation is looked at from this perspective, it is seen to be a success and suggests that large scale projects increase water security, however when analysed from a different view, many problems being to arise. An example of these costs are factors such as the dammed waters drowned 100,000 hectares of arable land, along with 13 cities, many smaller settlement and 13 factories. 1.9 million people have been displaced from their homes and land because of reasons. As well as social impacts, many environmental issues were raised such as ecological impacts on fisheries, biodiversity…
- 794 Words
- 23 Pages
Good Essays -
Have you ever felt like you were a social outcast? Like you didn't fit in with your enviroment? Like you had to change your identity or adapt just to fit in? This is an example of how your enviroment shapes your identity. If your identity is not right for the enviroment you are forced to adapt, this is sometimes a consious effort, but sometimes not. Say for example you bullied over how you act. You would adapt, and try to consiously change your identity so you no longer got bullied over it. But to what extent does your enviroment shape your identity?…
- 541 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
into consideration when debating whether or not to rebuild the city. Some may argue that the river that…
- 827 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
By restoring the Chicago river, the quality of life would increase exponentially. The Chicago river is something we are touched by every day and we Chicagoans take that for granted. If we can restore the Chicago river to its full potential, quality of living will go up, the increase of revenue for the city will go up because of tourism, and the amount of fresh food will be increased greatly. The Chicago river is a life line worth preserving for all citizens. If there is one thing to preserve for the future Chicagoans, the river is it.…
- 97 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Restoration Principle number three states that to restore biodiversity and function it is crucial to restore aspects of the hydrological regime such as seasonal flooding, water table levels, and streamflow as historically accurate as possible. The restoration strategy should focus on allowing the river to flow naturally and use natural stabilizing techniques for the bank such as planting vegetation. Other goals include reducing riverbed degradation from dikes and allowing sediment to flow naturally down the Mississippi. The floodplains should be reintroduced and the dams should allow more water and sediment to flow through naturally. If the restoration strategy focuses on these goals, then the lower Mississippi Delta ecosystems should be restored, resulting in improved habitats, increased sediment flow, and riverbed…
- 512 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays