Preview

Argumentative Essay: Aviation Security And Civil Liberties

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
630 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay: Aviation Security And Civil Liberties
I do not agree with Benjamin Franklin, in many situations, it is favorable to give up public liberties so that we may ensure public safety. Such is often the case in airports, schools, federal buildings and various other locations. Additionally, while the constitution means to secure America’s liberties as well as insuring its domestic tranquility, it has been shown in several situations that this can not always be upheld. Favorable deals between liberty and safety are commonplace across civilian life. One such example is with airplane security. At airports across america, the Transportation Security Administration manages the tedious process of checking baggage and passengers. While they may not find anything wrong with a majority of passengers, Americans may ride safely and with a calm mind on their flights. Another example which has ensured the safety of the American populace is the ban on tobacco and firearms in schools. The ban on tobacco has dissuaded most in regards to dealing drugs to minors, The ban on firearms however has stirred debate due to recent school shootings. While these debates likely won’t resolve with policies changing, the american public doesn’t agree with Benjamin either, as they call for stricter gun control policies in response to these recent …show more content…
While the act itself had noble intentions of preserving the right of copyright holders the terminology used to describe and detail it led to fears of infringement of the first amendment, the right of free speech. The american public out-lashed at the potential loss of their first amendment rights, and so the bill was not passed. Still, the government’s intention was to preserve the safety of individual’s intellectual property, their means simply managed to go farther than the public was willing. Thus we can see a delicate and hard to maintain stability between protecting people’s rights, and ensuring their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages

    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."- Benjamin Franklin…

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The USA Patriot Act was rushed into law in the post-9/11 hysteria and with many congressional offices closed to the Anthrax scare. Many of the senators and representatives voting for it admitted they had not read the entire bill, but voted for it anyway…"…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Equally important, as we all understand that the government of the United States is mandated to strike a balance between the civil liberties and overall security, some of the Acts such as that called PATRIOT Act are supposed to ensure that the future challenges that will face the homeland security will have tomust provide a secure air transportation system (Nakaya, 2005). This is because PATRIOT Act will offer the best way to go alongside other existing laws in the United States. When such laws are in action, it is the function of the Civil Authorities to see into it that the same laws are not abused in any way.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We are told by our leaders that there are trade-offs when considering our security; that in order to create a secure America we must give up some freedoms and rules of our democracy for the protection of all. Homeland security involves many factors it does decrease civil liberties and individual freedoms and it totally increases governmental power; a thing ends its impossible to construct a counterterrorist system that ensures complete protection, allows for maximum civil liberty, and protects unrestricted freedoms of movement matter of fact the government is sacrificing some of its own branches to place more authority within one for each, the executive branch (White, Jonathan, 2006).…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    During America's most consequential wars, the United States government has restricted civil liberties of the American people despite the nation’s strong rooted foundation for preserving every citizen’s rights. When danger is an ever present factor for the nation due to war or conflict restrictions are often placed on some of the most basic freedoms and liberties. Perfect balancing of these restrictions is vital to the countries wellbeing. One of the most well-known examples of this type of restraint is Abraham Lincoln’s precedent of suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus and issuing martial law. Lincoln’s actions clearly violated the rights of the people that are guaranteed to them under the Constitution. While out of context it wouldn’t make much sense, the specific circumstance’s Abraham Lincoln was facing completely justified his unconstitutional orders. In retrospect we can now see how important Lincoln’s decisions were; If not for his actions the union may never have won the Civil War and history would have been irreparably altered. History repeated itself when following in Lincoln’s footstep’s, President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized the internment of over 100,000 people of Japanese descent in response to Japan’s attacks on the Pearl Harbor Naval Base. The country was in a state of panic and a response was needed to make Americans feel secure. Less than five decades later a similar attack devastated America. Similar to Roosevelt, George W. Bush was catapulted into taking responsive action after the September 11th terrorist attacks on U.S soil. His response was the Patriot Act. It was our founding fathers intentions for the people of these United States to be sheltered by liberty and freedom, however, it’s clear that later day presidents used a strong balance of discretion and justice for the sake of a greater good and national security. The government should be able to impede certain civil liberties should the situation arise where it is necessary as long as…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Airport Security Essay 9

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages

    America on September 11, 2001 required that we reform our nation 's aviation security system in fundamental ways. Three years after the Sept. 11 tragedies, how far has airport and airlines come? It depends on the source. While it is important for airports to heighten security after the attacks of 9/11, the policies of profiling passengers are inadequate and a necessitate revision.…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Stop And Frisk

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Founding Fathers believed that the sanctity of individual rights must be held above all else, due to their prior experiences with the tyrannical rule of King George III of Great Britain. After the drafting and ratification of the Constitution, the United States government has introduced several laws and allowed several actions that compromise the liberties guaranteed by the Constitution in the supposed name of security or the general welfare. These laws include the Espionage Act which was introduced during World War I, and the use and allowance of ‘Stop and Frisk’ procedures amongst America’s various police agencies. The introduction and use of these laws and procedures were meant to keep the American public safe following outbreaks of war and to try and prevent weapon related violence, but they also compromise the liberties that are ensured to the…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is more important to the citizens of America? The right to their privacy and doing what they want as they wish, in private? Or are they okay with the government surveilling every living thing that they do? Through loopholes in the Patriot Act, the government misuses their power by spying on millions of innocent Americans. The people do have rights within the fourth Amendment though. Simplified, it states that Americans have the right to privacy unless there is probable cause. (Kids n.d.) Where do we as Americans draw the line?…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We can understand how certain precautions must be made to insure safety in times of war but to go so far as to take away our freedoms are out of bounds. There are numerous other ways to make us safe without interfering with our liberties. For example: tighter security. After 9/11 security became very tight at airports and other areas where terrorists might be able to enter the country. Although this extra security was tedious and time consuming to get through, it was well within the lines of the 1st amendment because it did not take away any of our freedoms.…

    • 332 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (Ben Franklin) Do you want to live in a jail? It is really safe in a jail cell, but you have no right so is that what you are asking for? Or do you want things in US to be like how things are in Syria. Back in 1960 Syria was consider a free country, but when Hafez al-Assad ruled Syria he stared saying that we need more safety in this country, so he started passing new laws that weren’t that important. People didn’t pay any attention to what he was doing. They thought it was for the good of the county, but it wasn’t. Laws were passed just to protect the government. Anyone who dares to talk about the government was either thrown in jail or sentenced to death, and that is why Syria is now in a civil war. Did Syria get any safer by passing these law? Like ben franklin said they did not get neither liberty nor…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only. This side is in favor of having stricter gun control laws, as they feel that by having stricter laws the number of crimes that are being committed with guns will be reduced and thus save lives. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals' access to guns, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law; these citizens make up a great majority of the opposing side of this argument. These people argue that the law was made with the individual citizens in mind. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to…

    • 2205 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kill the Internet

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One reason to my decision on agreeing is the leading affect of progressive voices and outlets of skillful writers work is being taken into someone else’s work. According to the Politics website, the legislation would allow copyright holders and the justice Department to seek court orders against websites associated with copyright infringement. To the legislative, they believe that the copyright holders chances of winning is not very high. They see coping as a threat to publishers and should be banned even if internet websites lose business.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Catastrophic events have occurred over time over time,many could have been prevented. and many are results from our “freedoms” that has been taken advantage of. California social service center shooting, World War 1, and “Rights to the streets of Memphis,” by Richard Wright convey that protection is needed to live without fear.…

    • 52 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government Surveillance

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. “(Benjamin Franklin)…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    School bus accidents almost always bring some sense of anxiety. It does not matter if it includes injuries or if there are no injuries, the general population always fears the worse. The statement of “children are safer on the bus” goes right out the window when a parent is informed their child has been involved in an accident while riding the bus to or from school. However, that statement is a true statement children are safer on the bus than in a regular vehicle during school hours. The facts are parents put their trust in someone else to deliver their child or children to school and when there is an accident that trust becomes compromised and the parents easily blame the driver of the bus automatically. It is at this time the age old question comes into play. Would children be safer if they were made to wear seat belts on the bus? Ultimately, a child would not be safer if made to wear seat belts on the bus.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays