While the act itself had noble intentions of preserving the right of copyright holders the terminology used to describe and detail it led to fears of infringement of the first amendment, the right of free speech. The american public out-lashed at the potential loss of their first amendment rights, and so the bill was not passed. Still, the government’s intention was to preserve the safety of individual’s intellectual property, their means simply managed to go farther than the public was willing. Thus we can see a delicate and hard to maintain stability between protecting people’s rights, and ensuring their
While the act itself had noble intentions of preserving the right of copyright holders the terminology used to describe and detail it led to fears of infringement of the first amendment, the right of free speech. The american public out-lashed at the potential loss of their first amendment rights, and so the bill was not passed. Still, the government’s intention was to preserve the safety of individual’s intellectual property, their means simply managed to go farther than the public was willing. Thus we can see a delicate and hard to maintain stability between protecting people’s rights, and ensuring their